Digital Culture of the Individual as a Factor in the Socio-Psychological Safety of the Digital Space

M. Kudryavtseva, A. Pryakhina
{"title":"Digital Culture of the Individual as a Factor in the Socio-Psychological Safety of the Digital Space","authors":"M. Kudryavtseva, A. Pryakhina","doi":"10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-5-98-116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The purpose of the article is to actualize the problem of the development of ideological transformations of modern society, determined by the new digital reality, as well as to determine the phenomenon of digital personal culture, its socio-psychological functions in a digital society, fixing the structure and content of each component.Methodology and sources. In their reflections, the authors relied on the works of the following researchers O.A. Grimov, V.I. Przhilensky, E.O. Trufanova, L.V. Baeva, I.I. Gorlova, A.L. Zorin, G.V. Soldatova, A.Yu. Kvitko, R.V. Belyaev and E.I. Grigorieva, M.I. Tsareva, etc. The empirical research carried out in the article was of a probing nature and was considered as preliminary, only outlining the paths of a possible deeper and more complete study. Thus, the article uses value and socio-psychological approaches. Analysis of a person’s digital culture from the standpoint of a value approach makes it possible to determine criteria for assessing the results of human social practices implemented in the digital space. The use of a socio-psychological approach makes it possible to determine the digital culture of an individual in the context of such phenomena as socialization and personal self-identification.Results and discussion. The most obvious discrepancies in the results of the questionnaire survey of different age groups were in those answers that were intended to determine the presence of an ontological component of a person’s digital culture. The legitimacy of the digital world as a different “mode of being” and a space for self-expression is recognized primarily by representatives of the younger age group, which is an alarming symptom. However, the greater level of responsibility in real life compared to digital life, which is recognized by representatives of all age groups, still allows us to speak about a certain expression of the ontological component. Also, the authors reveal a certain severity of the informational and communicative-ethical components of the digital culture of the individual.Conclusion. A more in-depth study, reliably obtained by the authors of the most general results, could be devoted to a deeper immersion in the development of individual aspects of individual authors of the components of the personality of digital culture, the study of the digital culture of individual age groups, the determination of connections between the personality of digital culture and its professional behavior and a number of other issues.","PeriodicalId":505315,"journal":{"name":"Discourse","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-5-98-116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The purpose of the article is to actualize the problem of the development of ideological transformations of modern society, determined by the new digital reality, as well as to determine the phenomenon of digital personal culture, its socio-psychological functions in a digital society, fixing the structure and content of each component.Methodology and sources. In their reflections, the authors relied on the works of the following researchers O.A. Grimov, V.I. Przhilensky, E.O. Trufanova, L.V. Baeva, I.I. Gorlova, A.L. Zorin, G.V. Soldatova, A.Yu. Kvitko, R.V. Belyaev and E.I. Grigorieva, M.I. Tsareva, etc. The empirical research carried out in the article was of a probing nature and was considered as preliminary, only outlining the paths of a possible deeper and more complete study. Thus, the article uses value and socio-psychological approaches. Analysis of a person’s digital culture from the standpoint of a value approach makes it possible to determine criteria for assessing the results of human social practices implemented in the digital space. The use of a socio-psychological approach makes it possible to determine the digital culture of an individual in the context of such phenomena as socialization and personal self-identification.Results and discussion. The most obvious discrepancies in the results of the questionnaire survey of different age groups were in those answers that were intended to determine the presence of an ontological component of a person’s digital culture. The legitimacy of the digital world as a different “mode of being” and a space for self-expression is recognized primarily by representatives of the younger age group, which is an alarming symptom. However, the greater level of responsibility in real life compared to digital life, which is recognized by representatives of all age groups, still allows us to speak about a certain expression of the ontological component. Also, the authors reveal a certain severity of the informational and communicative-ethical components of the digital culture of the individual.Conclusion. A more in-depth study, reliably obtained by the authors of the most general results, could be devoted to a deeper immersion in the development of individual aspects of individual authors of the components of the personality of digital culture, the study of the digital culture of individual age groups, the determination of connections between the personality of digital culture and its professional behavior and a number of other issues.
作为数字空间社会心理安全因素的个人数字文化
引言本文的目的是研究新的数字现实所决定的现代社会意识形态变革的发展问题,以及确定数字个人文化现象、其在数字社会中的社会心理功能,确定每个组成部分的结构和内容。在思考过程中,作者参考了以下研究人员的著作:O.A. Grimov、V.I. Przhilensky、E.O. Trufanova、L.V. Baeva、I.I. Gorlova、A.L. Zorin、G.V. Soldatova、A.Yu.Kvitko、R.V. Belyaev 和 E.I. Grigorieva、M.I. Tsareva 等。文章中进行的实证研究具有探索性质,被认为是初步性的,只是为可能进行的更深入、更全面的研究勾勒出路径。因此,文章采用了价值和社会心理学方法。从价值方法的角度分析一个人的数字文化,可以确定评估在数字空间实施的人类社会实践结果的标准。采用社会心理学方法则可以在社会化和个人自我认同等现象的背景下确定个人的数字文化。不同年龄组的问卷调查结果最明显的差异在于那些旨在确定个人数字文化中是否存在本体成分的答案。数字世界作为一种不同的 "存在方式 "和自我表达空间的合法性主要得到了年轻群体代表的认可,这是一个令人担忧的征兆。然而,与数字生活相比,现实生活中的责任感更强,这一点得到了所有年龄段代表的认可,因此我们仍然可以谈论本体论部分的某种表现形式。此外,作者还揭示了个人数字文化中的信息和交流伦理部分的某种严重性。作者们可靠地获得了最普遍的结果,可以对这些结果进行更深入的研究,以便更深 入地了解作者个人在数字文化个性组成部分方面的发展,研究各个年龄组的数字文化,确 定数字文化个性与其职业行为之间的联系,以及其他一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信