Perbandingan Kinerja K-Nearest Neighbors dan Naive Bayes Untuk Klasifikasi Perilaku Nasabah Pada Pembayaran Kredit Bank

Anang Susilo
{"title":"Perbandingan Kinerja K-Nearest Neighbors dan Naive Bayes Untuk Klasifikasi Perilaku Nasabah Pada Pembayaran Kredit Bank","authors":"Anang Susilo","doi":"10.47233/jsit.v3i3.1264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":":Credit customers are people who use banking services or other financial services. to use bank money in its business activities, so it expects that the bank's credit can meet business capital needs. To reach information to increase profits and reduce company losses, we need a method that can provide knowledge to support the company's data. Research data can be obtained from processing classification data from credit customer data that are categorized as potential or not potential in the next credit grant. Data processing can be done using machine learning, namely classification techniques. This technique will produce a predictive churn model to determine which customer categories belong to a group. potential smooth or jammed. The Naive Bayes method was chosen because it can produce maximum accuracy with little training data. Meanwhile, the K-Nearest Neighbor method was chosen because it is robust against noise data. The performance of the two methods will be compared, so that it can be seen which method is better in classifying documents. The results obtained show that the Naive Bayes method has better performance with an accuracy rate of 70%, while the K-Nearest Neighbor method has a fairly low accuracy rate of 40%. Thus, it can be seen the accuracy value displayed by applying the classification algorithm. K-Nears Neighbors and Naïve Bayes. Parameter category. which in this study are account numbers, names of debtors, collectibility in the categories: current, DPK (on special mention), substandard, doubtful, loss. Then clarified with a description of the type of loan, collectability of ADK (computer data archive), type of business.","PeriodicalId":302680,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi (JSIT)","volume":"147 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi (JSIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47233/jsit.v3i3.1264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

:Credit customers are people who use banking services or other financial services. to use bank money in its business activities, so it expects that the bank's credit can meet business capital needs. To reach information to increase profits and reduce company losses, we need a method that can provide knowledge to support the company's data. Research data can be obtained from processing classification data from credit customer data that are categorized as potential or not potential in the next credit grant. Data processing can be done using machine learning, namely classification techniques. This technique will produce a predictive churn model to determine which customer categories belong to a group. potential smooth or jammed. The Naive Bayes method was chosen because it can produce maximum accuracy with little training data. Meanwhile, the K-Nearest Neighbor method was chosen because it is robust against noise data. The performance of the two methods will be compared, so that it can be seen which method is better in classifying documents. The results obtained show that the Naive Bayes method has better performance with an accuracy rate of 70%, while the K-Nearest Neighbor method has a fairly low accuracy rate of 40%. Thus, it can be seen the accuracy value displayed by applying the classification algorithm. K-Nears Neighbors and Naïve Bayes. Parameter category. which in this study are account numbers, names of debtors, collectibility in the categories: current, DPK (on special mention), substandard, doubtful, loss. Then clarified with a description of the type of loan, collectability of ADK (computer data archive), type of business.
K-Nearest Neighbors 和 Naive Bayes 在银行贷款支付客户行为分类中的性能比较
信贷客户是指使用银行服务或其他金融服务的人,他们在商业活动中使用银行的资金,因此希望银行的信贷能够满足企业的资金需求。为了获得增加利润和减少公司损失的信息,我们需要一种能够为公司数据提供知识支持的方法。研究数据可以通过处理信贷客户数据中的分类数据获得,这些数据被归类为下一次信贷授信中的潜在或非潜在客户。数据处理可以使用机器学习,即分类技术。该技术将产生一个预测流失模型,以确定哪些客户类别属于一个群体。潜在的顺利或卡壳。之所以选择 Naive Bayes 方法,是因为该方法只需少量训练数据就能获得最高准确率。同时,选择 K-近邻法是因为它对噪声数据具有鲁棒性。通过比较两种方法的性能,可以看出哪种方法能更好地对文档进行分类。结果显示,Naive Bayes 方法的准确率为 70%,性能更好,而 K-Nearest Neighbor 方法的准确率相当低,只有 40%。由此可见,应用分类算法所显示的准确率值。K-Nears Neighbors 和 Naïve Bayes。在本研究中,参数类别包括帐号、债务人姓名、可收回性类别:流动、DPK(特别提及)、不达标、可疑、损失。然后再说明贷款类型、ADK(计算机数据档案)的可收回性、业务类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信