Latin American ecolinguistics: deconstructing discourse studies, coloniality and industrial environmentalism

Diego L. Forte
{"title":"Latin American ecolinguistics: deconstructing discourse studies, coloniality and industrial environmentalism","authors":"Diego L. Forte","doi":"10.1515/jwl-2023-0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Latin American universities have a strong tradition in discourse studies. Beginning in the sixties, local discourse analysis approaches introduced a critical turn that started in linguistics and semiotics and crossed social sciences establishing a new critical perspective. Ecolinguistics and environmental studies, on the other hand, present a different case. As a theoretical approach, ecolinguistics has found a hard time establishing itself as an autonomous discipline in the universities of the region, struggling with the tradition built by discourse studies. This article aims to analyse the development of Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) and ecolinguistics in Latin America to present a possible explanation of the difficulties ecolinguists have found in the region to introduce their scope in formal academic institutions and why critical discourse analysis (CDA) have remained far from the eco-perspectives in South America. We argue that Latin American CDA still maintains a Eurocentric vision while environmental perspectives remain loyal to the anthropocentrism and industrial fatalism posed by the dominant discourses. We believe that if issues approached keep an anthropocentric perspective while theoretical frames present a Eurocentric thinking, ecolinguistics, along with critical animal studies (CAS) and gender studies, may present an alternative to human-nonhuman-nature relations.","PeriodicalId":508180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Languages","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2023-0052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Latin American universities have a strong tradition in discourse studies. Beginning in the sixties, local discourse analysis approaches introduced a critical turn that started in linguistics and semiotics and crossed social sciences establishing a new critical perspective. Ecolinguistics and environmental studies, on the other hand, present a different case. As a theoretical approach, ecolinguistics has found a hard time establishing itself as an autonomous discipline in the universities of the region, struggling with the tradition built by discourse studies. This article aims to analyse the development of Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) and ecolinguistics in Latin America to present a possible explanation of the difficulties ecolinguists have found in the region to introduce their scope in formal academic institutions and why critical discourse analysis (CDA) have remained far from the eco-perspectives in South America. We argue that Latin American CDA still maintains a Eurocentric vision while environmental perspectives remain loyal to the anthropocentrism and industrial fatalism posed by the dominant discourses. We believe that if issues approached keep an anthropocentric perspective while theoretical frames present a Eurocentric thinking, ecolinguistics, along with critical animal studies (CAS) and gender studies, may present an alternative to human-nonhuman-nature relations.
拉丁美洲生态语言学:解构话语研究、殖民主义和工业环保主义
摘要 拉丁美洲的大学在话语研究方面有着深厚的传统。从六十年代开始,当地的话语分析方法引入了一种批判性转向,这种转向始于语言学和符号学,并跨越了社会科学,建立了一种新的批判性视角。生态语言学和环境研究则是另一种情况。作为一种理论方法,生态语言学在该地区的大学中很难成为一门独立的学科,与话语研究建立起来的传统相抗争。本文旨在分析批判性话语研究(CDS)和生态语言学在拉丁美洲的发展情况,从而为生态语言学家在该地区的正规学术机构中引入其研究范围所遇到的困难,以及为什么批判性话语分析(CDA)在南美洲仍然远离生态观点提供一个可能的解释。我们认为,拉丁美洲的批判性话语分析(CDA)仍然保持着欧洲中心主义的视野,而环境视角仍然忠实于主流话语中的人类中心主义和工业宿命论。我们认为,如果在处理问题时保持人类中心主义的视角,而理论框架却呈现出欧洲中心主义的思维,那么生态语言学与批判性动物研究(CAS)和性别研究可能会为人类-非人类-自然关系提供另一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信