The turning point of civilization: Sociological perspective toward artificial intelligence on modern humanity

Simulacra Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI:10.21107/sml.v6i2.22808
Mansurni Abadi, Rajih Arraki, Anna Podara, Tatevik Ghazaryan, Ahmad Mufid
{"title":"The turning point of civilization: Sociological perspective toward artificial intelligence on modern humanity","authors":"Mansurni Abadi, Rajih Arraki, Anna Podara, Tatevik Ghazaryan, Ahmad Mufid","doi":"10.21107/sml.v6i2.22808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ongoing debate about whether artificial intelligence (AI) is a gift or a curse to humanity is explored in this study from a sociological perspective. The study examines how AI simplifies human work but devalues creativity, intuition, emotion, and consciousness, ultimately transforming society. The research suggests that while the challenges of AI can be overcome, three aspects of human cognition are difficult to replace: curiosity, humility, and emotional intelligence. On a social level, AI cannot replace initiatives for cooperation, cultural awareness, and encouragement to be part of society (sense of socialization). The study emphasizes the need for values, rules, and discourse. AI must be based on human rights, democracy, inclusion and diversity. It strengthens and enhances the discourse and practice of digital humanism and post-humanism. It also highlights the importance of incorporating religious values, local wisdom, and rules or policies to mitigate and resolve AI risks. The conclusion is that AI is not inherently a threat to humanity, but rather the greatest threat is humanity itself. The research emphasizes the need for collective feedback and understanding to improve AI systems through collaboration, as the road is long and full of surprises and challenges.","PeriodicalId":33192,"journal":{"name":"Simulacra","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulacra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v6i2.22808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ongoing debate about whether artificial intelligence (AI) is a gift or a curse to humanity is explored in this study from a sociological perspective. The study examines how AI simplifies human work but devalues creativity, intuition, emotion, and consciousness, ultimately transforming society. The research suggests that while the challenges of AI can be overcome, three aspects of human cognition are difficult to replace: curiosity, humility, and emotional intelligence. On a social level, AI cannot replace initiatives for cooperation, cultural awareness, and encouragement to be part of society (sense of socialization). The study emphasizes the need for values, rules, and discourse. AI must be based on human rights, democracy, inclusion and diversity. It strengthens and enhances the discourse and practice of digital humanism and post-humanism. It also highlights the importance of incorporating religious values, local wisdom, and rules or policies to mitigate and resolve AI risks. The conclusion is that AI is not inherently a threat to humanity, but rather the greatest threat is humanity itself. The research emphasizes the need for collective feedback and understanding to improve AI systems through collaboration, as the road is long and full of surprises and challenges.
文明的转折点:从社会学角度看人工智能对现代人类的影响
本研究从社会学角度探讨了关于人工智能(AI)对人类是恩赐还是诅咒的持续辩论。研究探讨了人工智能如何简化人类工作,但却贬低创造力、直觉、情感和意识,最终改变社会。研究表明,虽然人工智能的挑战是可以克服的,但人类认知的三个方面是难以取代的:好奇心、谦逊和情商。在社会层面,人工智能无法取代合作、文化意识和鼓励成为社会一部分(社会化意识)的举措。研究强调了价值观、规则和话语的必要性。人工智能必须以人权、民主、包容和多样性为基础。它加强和提高了数字人文主义和后人文主义的论述和实践。它还强调了纳入宗教价值观、地方智慧和规则或政策以减轻和解决人工智能风险的重要性。结论是,人工智能本质上并不是对人类的威胁,最大的威胁是人类自身。研究强调,需要集体反馈和理解,通过合作改进人工智能系统,因为道路漫长,充满惊喜和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信