Quantitative assessment of urinary equol levels, equol-producing bacteria, and the faecal microbiota in healthy Japanese individuals

M. Kodera, K. Nakamura, T. Ezaki, T. Suzuki, S. Yokoyama
{"title":"Quantitative assessment of urinary equol levels, equol-producing bacteria, and the faecal microbiota in healthy Japanese individuals","authors":"M. Kodera, K. Nakamura, T. Ezaki, T. Suzuki, S. Yokoyama","doi":"10.1163/18762891-20230038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Equol (4′,7-isoflavandiol) has attracted considerable attention for its potential efficacy in treating hormonal diseases. In this study we collected samples from healthy Japanese individuals (n = 91) to observe the relationship between the abundance of equol-producing bacteria in their faeces and the concentration of equol in their urine. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) targeting the dihydrodaidzein reductase gene (dhdr) was used to detect equol-producing bacteria. Equol producers, who were defined as individuals with >1000 nmol/l equol in their urine, exhibited 4-8 log10 copies of dhdr/g faeces of equol-producing bacteria. We assessed the accuracy of these findings by determining the rate of correspondence between possessing equol-producing bacteria and producing urinary equol. Of the 91 participants, 33 were found to be positive for both equol-producing bacteria and urinary equol, 52 were negative for both, one was positive for equol-producing bacteria and negative for urinary equol, and five were negative for equol-producing bacteria and positive for urinary equol. The sensitivity and specificity of the qPCR for detecting equol-producing bacteria were 86.8% and 98.1%, respectively. On the whole, the presence of equol-producing bacteria and urinary equol displayed 93.4% concordance, with a kappa coefficient of 0.862. No apparent correlation was observed between dhdr copy number in the faeces and urinary equol concentrations. Analysis of the faecal microbiota showed that alpha diversity indices (OTU, ACE, Chao1, Shannon) were significantly higher in equol producers. Specifically, the relative abundance of phylum Pseudomonadota was increased in non-equol producers, while abundance of genus Alistipes, Barnesiella, Butyricimonas, Odoribacter, and Ruminococcus, which produce short chain fatty acids and/or hydrogen, were only observed in equol producers. These results suggest that a certain amount of equol-producing bacteria must be present in the intestine to produce detectable levels of equol, and that equol productivity might be affected by other components of the microbiota.","PeriodicalId":505564,"journal":{"name":"Beneficial Microbes","volume":"27 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beneficial Microbes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18762891-20230038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Equol (4′,7-isoflavandiol) has attracted considerable attention for its potential efficacy in treating hormonal diseases. In this study we collected samples from healthy Japanese individuals (n = 91) to observe the relationship between the abundance of equol-producing bacteria in their faeces and the concentration of equol in their urine. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) targeting the dihydrodaidzein reductase gene (dhdr) was used to detect equol-producing bacteria. Equol producers, who were defined as individuals with >1000 nmol/l equol in their urine, exhibited 4-8 log10 copies of dhdr/g faeces of equol-producing bacteria. We assessed the accuracy of these findings by determining the rate of correspondence between possessing equol-producing bacteria and producing urinary equol. Of the 91 participants, 33 were found to be positive for both equol-producing bacteria and urinary equol, 52 were negative for both, one was positive for equol-producing bacteria and negative for urinary equol, and five were negative for equol-producing bacteria and positive for urinary equol. The sensitivity and specificity of the qPCR for detecting equol-producing bacteria were 86.8% and 98.1%, respectively. On the whole, the presence of equol-producing bacteria and urinary equol displayed 93.4% concordance, with a kappa coefficient of 0.862. No apparent correlation was observed between dhdr copy number in the faeces and urinary equol concentrations. Analysis of the faecal microbiota showed that alpha diversity indices (OTU, ACE, Chao1, Shannon) were significantly higher in equol producers. Specifically, the relative abundance of phylum Pseudomonadota was increased in non-equol producers, while abundance of genus Alistipes, Barnesiella, Butyricimonas, Odoribacter, and Ruminococcus, which produce short chain fatty acids and/or hydrogen, were only observed in equol producers. These results suggest that a certain amount of equol-producing bacteria must be present in the intestine to produce detectable levels of equol, and that equol productivity might be affected by other components of the microbiota.
定量评估日本健康人的尿液马勃醇水平、马勃醇产生菌和粪便微生物群
马兜铃醇(4′,7-异黄烷二醇)因其在治疗荷尔蒙疾病方面的潜在疗效而备受关注。在本研究中,我们采集了健康日本人(n = 91)的样本,以观察其粪便中产马兜铃醇细菌的丰度与尿液中马兜铃醇浓度之间的关系。定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)以二氢麦芽酚还原酶基因(dhdr)为目标,用于检测产马醇细菌。尿液中等酚含量大于 1000 nmol/l 的人即为等酚产生者,其粪便中的等酚产生细菌的 dhdr 拷贝数为 4-8 log10/克。我们通过确定拥有马勃醇产生菌与尿液中马勃醇产生之间的对应率来评估这些发现的准确性。在 91 名参与者中,有 33 人的等醇产生菌和尿液中的等醇均为阳性,52 人的等醇产生菌和尿液中的等醇均为阴性,1 人的等醇产生菌为阳性而尿液中的等醇为阴性,5 人的等醇产生菌为阴性而尿液中的等醇为阳性。qPCR 检测产马醇细菌的灵敏度和特异度分别为 86.8% 和 98.1%。总体而言,产马醇细菌与尿中马醇的一致性为 93.4%,卡帕系数为 0.862。粪便中的 dhdr 拷贝数与尿液中的等醇浓度之间没有明显的相关性。粪便微生物群分析表明,等醇生产者的阿尔法多样性指数(OTU、ACE、Chao1、Shannon)明显较高。具体来说,假单胞菌门的相对丰度在非等醇生产者中有所增加,而产生短链脂肪酸和/或氢的Alistipes属、Barnesiella属、Butyricimonas属、Odoribacter属和Ruminococcus属的丰度仅在等醇生产者中观察到。这些结果表明,肠道中必须存在一定数量的生产马勃醇的细菌,才能产生可检测到的马勃醇水平,而且马勃醇的生产率可能会受到微生物群中其他成分的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信