Traffic and environmental impacts of constructing and operating a BRT service: Case study in Amman, Jordan

IF 2.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
L. Shbeeb
{"title":"Traffic and environmental impacts of constructing and operating a BRT service: Case study in Amman, Jordan","authors":"L. Shbeeb","doi":"10.1080/23311916.2023.2283316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Road authorities are committed to improving community infrastructure through Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) projects. Yet, these initiatives often disrupt traffic, as seen in the Amman BRT project. A study assessed traffic conditions during various stages to address these disruptions, including simulated BRT operations. The research collected data on traffic volume, travel time, delays, and transit ridership before, during, and after construction and after BRT operations began. As a case study, the study focused on the impact of Amman’s first mass transit system at the Yajouz intersection. Traffic volumes decreased by 28% during construction, reducing delays significantly from 118.03 to 91.04 seconds. Although average speeds increased slightly (one km/h, on average), travel time doubled, negatively impacting 84% of businesses due to considering alternative routes for traveller destinations. However, delays significantly reduced after construction to 58 seconds per vehicle despite the higher traffic volume. Traffic simulations during construction underestimated observed delays (53.5 seconds per vehicle vs. 73.7 seconds per vehicle), still indicating a Level of Service (LOS) E. In BRT operation, modelled delays (55.8 seconds per vehicle) were lower than observed (63.8 seconds per vehicle), maintaining same LOS level. BRT minimally impacted ridership, an expected outcome given its trial phase. Environmental assessments revealed emissions peaking during construction, with a 25% modal shift to BRT yielding the lowest emissions. The study stresses sustainable urban mobility, advocating for meticulous planning, adaptable policies, and public awareness, emphasizing the need for detailed pedestrian research in this context.","PeriodicalId":10464,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Engineering","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2283316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Road authorities are committed to improving community infrastructure through Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) projects. Yet, these initiatives often disrupt traffic, as seen in the Amman BRT project. A study assessed traffic conditions during various stages to address these disruptions, including simulated BRT operations. The research collected data on traffic volume, travel time, delays, and transit ridership before, during, and after construction and after BRT operations began. As a case study, the study focused on the impact of Amman’s first mass transit system at the Yajouz intersection. Traffic volumes decreased by 28% during construction, reducing delays significantly from 118.03 to 91.04 seconds. Although average speeds increased slightly (one km/h, on average), travel time doubled, negatively impacting 84% of businesses due to considering alternative routes for traveller destinations. However, delays significantly reduced after construction to 58 seconds per vehicle despite the higher traffic volume. Traffic simulations during construction underestimated observed delays (53.5 seconds per vehicle vs. 73.7 seconds per vehicle), still indicating a Level of Service (LOS) E. In BRT operation, modelled delays (55.8 seconds per vehicle) were lower than observed (63.8 seconds per vehicle), maintaining same LOS level. BRT minimally impacted ridership, an expected outcome given its trial phase. Environmental assessments revealed emissions peaking during construction, with a 25% modal shift to BRT yielding the lowest emissions. The study stresses sustainable urban mobility, advocating for meticulous planning, adaptable policies, and public awareness, emphasizing the need for detailed pedestrian research in this context.
快速公交系统的建设和运营对交通和环境的影响:约旦安曼案例研究
摘要 道路管理部门致力于通过快速公交(BRT)项目改善社区基础设施。然而,这些措施往往会扰乱交通,安曼快速公交项目就是一例。一项研究评估了不同阶段的交通状况,以解决这些干扰问题,包括模拟快速公交运营。研究收集了施工前、施工期间、施工后以及快速公交开始运营后的交通流量、行车时间、延误情况和公交乘客数量等数据。作为一项案例研究,该研究重点关注安曼首个公共交通系统在 Yajouz 十字路口的影响。施工期间,交通流量减少了 28%,延误时间从 118.03 秒大幅减少到 91.04 秒。虽然平均车速略有提高(平均每小时 1 公里),但旅行时间却增加了一倍,这对 84% 的企业造成了负面影响,因为旅客需要考虑选择其他路线前往目的地。不过,尽管车流量增加,但施工后延误时间明显减少,每辆车的延误时间为 58 秒。施工期间的交通模拟低估了观察到的延误时间(每辆车 53.5 秒对 73.7 秒),但仍显示出 E 级服务水平(LOS)。在快速公交运行期间,模拟延误时间(每辆车 55.8 秒)低于观察到的延误时间(每辆车 63.8 秒),维持了相同的 LOS 水平。快速公交对乘客数量的影响最小,这也是其试验阶段的预期结果。环境评估显示,施工期间的排放量达到峰值,25% 的交通模式转变为快速公交的排放量最低。该研究强调了可持续的城市交通,提倡细致的规划、适应性强的政策和公众意识,并强调在此背景下需要进行详细的行人研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cogent Engineering
Cogent Engineering ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
213
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: One of the largest, multidisciplinary open access engineering journals of peer-reviewed research, Cogent Engineering, part of the Taylor & Francis Group, covers all areas of engineering and technology, from chemical engineering to computer science, and mechanical to materials engineering. Cogent Engineering encourages interdisciplinary research and also accepts negative results, software article, replication studies and reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信