Rotordynamic characteristics of a novel labyrinth seal with partition walls and helical groove teeth

IF 1.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Wensong Xue, Z. Fang, Tianhao Wang, Zhigang Li, Jun Li
{"title":"Rotordynamic characteristics of a novel labyrinth seal with partition walls and helical groove teeth","authors":"Wensong Xue, Z. Fang, Tianhao Wang, Zhigang Li, Jun Li","doi":"10.1177/09576509231218482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To improve the stability of the conventional labyrinth seal (LS), in this paper, four novel fully partitioned helically labyrinth seals (FPHGLS) were designed and they were in comparison with one FPPGLS. The influences of the preswirl ratio and the helical groove pitch on the leakage flow and rotordynamic characteristics were numerically investigated, using the transient computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method based on the multi-frequency elliptical whirling orbit model. The accuracy and availability of the present transient numerical method were demonstrated based on the experiment data. The results show that the partition walls design can significantly increase the direct damping and cross-coupling stiffness for labyrinth seals and the helical teeth design can significantly decrease the cross-coupling stiffness and tangential force. When the helical groove pitch is equal to the seal length, the leakage nearly remains unchanged. Compared to the baseline design (LS), the FPPGLS and the FPHGLS have similar and significantly larger direct stiffness and direct damping. The two designs possess positive direct stiffness throughout the frequency range. The FPPGLS and FPHGLS possess significantly higher direct damping (∼323.7% larger than LS). But the FPPGLS possesses the largest cross-coupling stiffness among three seals at two preswirl ratios. From preswirl ratio = 0.13–0.84, the cross-coupling stiffness of the FPHGLS decreases by 53.4-310.1% compared with the FPPGLS. Increasing the helical groove pitch increases both direct stiffness and direct damping and reduces cross-coupling stiffness, but it also leads to greater leakage losses. In general, the novel FPHGLS whose helical groove pitch is equal to seal length possesses superior rotordynamic characteristics and similar leakage characteristic. This work provides the reference of the seal design and safety operation for the turbomachinery.","PeriodicalId":20705,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09576509231218482","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To improve the stability of the conventional labyrinth seal (LS), in this paper, four novel fully partitioned helically labyrinth seals (FPHGLS) were designed and they were in comparison with one FPPGLS. The influences of the preswirl ratio and the helical groove pitch on the leakage flow and rotordynamic characteristics were numerically investigated, using the transient computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method based on the multi-frequency elliptical whirling orbit model. The accuracy and availability of the present transient numerical method were demonstrated based on the experiment data. The results show that the partition walls design can significantly increase the direct damping and cross-coupling stiffness for labyrinth seals and the helical teeth design can significantly decrease the cross-coupling stiffness and tangential force. When the helical groove pitch is equal to the seal length, the leakage nearly remains unchanged. Compared to the baseline design (LS), the FPPGLS and the FPHGLS have similar and significantly larger direct stiffness and direct damping. The two designs possess positive direct stiffness throughout the frequency range. The FPPGLS and FPHGLS possess significantly higher direct damping (∼323.7% larger than LS). But the FPPGLS possesses the largest cross-coupling stiffness among three seals at two preswirl ratios. From preswirl ratio = 0.13–0.84, the cross-coupling stiffness of the FPHGLS decreases by 53.4-310.1% compared with the FPPGLS. Increasing the helical groove pitch increases both direct stiffness and direct damping and reduces cross-coupling stiffness, but it also leads to greater leakage losses. In general, the novel FPHGLS whose helical groove pitch is equal to seal length possesses superior rotordynamic characteristics and similar leakage characteristic. This work provides the reference of the seal design and safety operation for the turbomachinery.
带有隔墙和螺旋槽齿的新型迷宫密封件的旋转动力特性
为了提高传统迷宫密封(LS)的稳定性,本文设计了四种新型全隔板螺旋迷宫密封(FPHGLS),并与一种全隔板螺旋迷宫密封(FPPGLS)进行了比较。采用基于多频椭圆漩涡轨道模型的瞬态计算流体动力学(CFD)方法,对预漩涡比和螺旋槽间距对泄漏流和旋转动力学特性的影响进行了数值研究。实验数据证明了本瞬态数值方法的准确性和可用性。结果表明,隔墙设计能显著提高迷宫密封的直接阻尼和交叉耦合刚度,而螺旋齿设计能显著降低交叉耦合刚度和切向力。当螺旋槽间距等于密封件长度时,泄漏几乎保持不变。与基线设计(LS)相比,FPPGLS 和 FPHGLS 的直接刚度和直接阻尼相近且明显增大。这两种设计在整个频率范围内都具有正的直接刚度。FPPGLS 和 FPHGLS 的直接阻尼明显更大(比 LS 大 323.7%)。但在两个前旋比下,FPPGLS 在三种密封件中具有最大的交叉耦合刚度。从预旋流比 = 0.13-0.84 开始,FPHGLS 的交叉耦合刚度比 FPPGLS 降低了 53.4-310.1%。增加螺旋槽间距可提高直接刚度和直接阻尼,降低交叉耦合刚度,但同时也会导致更大的泄漏损失。总的来说,螺旋槽间距等于密封长度的新型 FPHGLS 具有更优越的旋转动力学特性和相似的泄漏特性。这项工作为透平机械的密封设计和安全运行提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
114
审稿时长
5.4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Power and Energy, Part A of the Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, is dedicated to publishing peer-reviewed papers of high scientific quality on all aspects of the technology of energy conversion systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信