Neural mechanosensitivity findings in patients with adhesive capsulitis

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION
Kazuhisa Matsui, Risako Suzuki, Keiko Nakai, Runa Kuwashima, Takashi Tachibana
{"title":"Neural mechanosensitivity findings in patients with adhesive capsulitis","authors":"Kazuhisa Matsui, Risako Suzuki, Keiko Nakai, Runa Kuwashima, Takashi Tachibana","doi":"10.3233/ppr-230762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGOURND: The pathophysiology of adhesive capsulitis may be associated with increased neural mechanosensitivity in upper limb neurodynamic test. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the findings of neurodynamic assessment in patients with more than four month history of adhesive capsulitis. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with more than four month history of adhesive capsulitis were participated in this study. A physiotherapist performed the Upper Limb Neurodynamic test 1 procedure on the participant’s upper limb. Elbow extension range of motion at the end of the Upper Limb Neurodynamic test 1 was compared with the participant’s elbow extension at the end of Upper Limb Neurodynamic test 1 performed on the opposite upper limb and to elbow extension on the symptomatic side performed with the arm by the side. RESULTS: The intensity of pain in Upper Limb Neurodynamic test 1 increased with lateral flexion of the neck to the unaffected side and eased with lateral flexion to the affected side in all participants. A marked restriction of the elbow passive extension range of motion in Upper Limb Neurodynamic test 1 on the affected side (–54.6±17.8°) compared to the unaffected side was found (–7.3±10.7°) (p <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Restriction of elbow passive extension range of motion at the end of the Upper Limb Neurodynamic 1 test reproduced patients’ familiar adhesive capsulitis associated pain and the pain changed with structural differentiation using cervical lateral flexion. Neurodynamic assessment may need to be considered to assess neural mechanosensitivity in patients with adhesive capsulitis.","PeriodicalId":38170,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","volume":"158 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-230762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGOURND: The pathophysiology of adhesive capsulitis may be associated with increased neural mechanosensitivity in upper limb neurodynamic test. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the findings of neurodynamic assessment in patients with more than four month history of adhesive capsulitis. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with more than four month history of adhesive capsulitis were participated in this study. A physiotherapist performed the Upper Limb Neurodynamic test 1 procedure on the participant’s upper limb. Elbow extension range of motion at the end of the Upper Limb Neurodynamic test 1 was compared with the participant’s elbow extension at the end of Upper Limb Neurodynamic test 1 performed on the opposite upper limb and to elbow extension on the symptomatic side performed with the arm by the side. RESULTS: The intensity of pain in Upper Limb Neurodynamic test 1 increased with lateral flexion of the neck to the unaffected side and eased with lateral flexion to the affected side in all participants. A marked restriction of the elbow passive extension range of motion in Upper Limb Neurodynamic test 1 on the affected side (–54.6±17.8°) compared to the unaffected side was found (–7.3±10.7°) (p <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Restriction of elbow passive extension range of motion at the end of the Upper Limb Neurodynamic 1 test reproduced patients’ familiar adhesive capsulitis associated pain and the pain changed with structural differentiation using cervical lateral flexion. Neurodynamic assessment may need to be considered to assess neural mechanosensitivity in patients with adhesive capsulitis.
粘连性关节囊炎患者的神经机械敏感性发现
背景:粘连性关节囊炎的病理生理学可能与上肢神经动力测试中神经机械敏感性增加有关。目的:研究粘连性囊炎病史超过四个月的患者的神经动力评估结果。方法:35 名粘连性关节囊炎病史超过四个月的患者参与了此次研究。理疗师对患者的上肢进行了上肢神经动力测试 1。将上肢神经动力测试 1 结束时的肘关节伸展活动范围与参与者在对侧上肢进行上肢神经动力测试 1 结束时的肘关节伸展活动范围进行比较,并与有症状一侧的肘关节伸展活动范围进行比较。结果:在上肢神经动力测试 1 中,所有参与者的疼痛强度都随着颈部向未受影响一侧侧屈而增加,随着向受影响一侧侧屈而减轻。在上肢神经动力测试 1 中,患侧的肘关节被动伸展活动范围(-54.6±17.8°)与未受影响侧(-7.3±10.7°)相比明显受限(p < 0.001)。结论:上肢神经动力1测试结束时肘关节被动伸展活动范围的限制再现了患者熟悉的粘连性关节囊炎相关疼痛,并且疼痛随着颈椎侧屈的结构分化而改变。在评估粘连性关节囊炎患者的神经机械敏感性时,可能需要考虑神经动力评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Physiotherapy Practice and Research Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信