How safe is it to plan a vaginal breech birth with OptiBreech collaborative care?: analysis of cumulative data within the OptiBreech Multiple Trials Cohort

Shawn Walker, Sabrina Das, Kate Stringer, Emma Spillane, Amy Meadowcroft, Siân M Davies, Jacana Bresson, Alice Hodder, Jasmine Kang
{"title":"How safe is it to plan a vaginal breech birth with OptiBreech collaborative care?: analysis of cumulative data within the OptiBreech Multiple Trials Cohort","authors":"Shawn Walker, Sabrina Das, Kate Stringer, Emma Spillane, Amy Meadowcroft, Siân M Davies, Jacana Bresson, Alice Hodder, Jasmine Kang","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13500.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background OptiBreech collaborative care is a multi-disciplinary care pathway for breech presentation at term. The OptiBreech Multiple Trial Cohort is designed to host multiple trials related to care for breech presentation. This design enables prospective data collection for a large cohort of women planning a vaginal breech birth (VBB), to assess rare safety outcomes, while answering questions requiring a smaller, randomised sample nested within this cohort. Methods OptiBreech database currently contains participants recruited from 10 January 2022, including 67 women randomised to either OptiBreech care or standard care, and 116 women who received OptiBreech care and were not randomised. Primary outcomes included vaginal birth rate, composite neonatal morbidity and mortality and composite maternal neonatal morbidity and mortality. Descriptive statistics for the entire cohort were analysed in SPSS Version 29. Sub-group analyses were identified through participant involvement and engagement work as important to support informed decision-making. Results Of 97 women who planned a VBB at any point, 44 (45.4%) achieved a vaginal birth, compared to 29/77 (37.7%) of women who did not plan a VBB. Admission rates to a neonatal unit were similar, 4/97 (4.1%) versus 3/77 (3.9%). In this cohort, there was no severe neonatal morbidity following planned VBB, compared to 3/77 (3.9%) among the cohort who did not plan a vaginal breech birth and 2/52 (3.7%) among women who planned a cephalic birth. Severe maternal morbidity following planned VBB was 7/89 (7.9%), compared to 9/76 (11.8%) for women who did not plan a VBB and 8/54 (14.8%) for women who planned a cephalic birth. Conclusions Planning a VBB with OptiBreech collaborative care has thus far been as safe as not planning a VBB. Detecting differences in rare outcomes will require thousands of births. Outcomes will continue to be monitored and reported here as the cohort grows.","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13500.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background OptiBreech collaborative care is a multi-disciplinary care pathway for breech presentation at term. The OptiBreech Multiple Trial Cohort is designed to host multiple trials related to care for breech presentation. This design enables prospective data collection for a large cohort of women planning a vaginal breech birth (VBB), to assess rare safety outcomes, while answering questions requiring a smaller, randomised sample nested within this cohort. Methods OptiBreech database currently contains participants recruited from 10 January 2022, including 67 women randomised to either OptiBreech care or standard care, and 116 women who received OptiBreech care and were not randomised. Primary outcomes included vaginal birth rate, composite neonatal morbidity and mortality and composite maternal neonatal morbidity and mortality. Descriptive statistics for the entire cohort were analysed in SPSS Version 29. Sub-group analyses were identified through participant involvement and engagement work as important to support informed decision-making. Results Of 97 women who planned a VBB at any point, 44 (45.4%) achieved a vaginal birth, compared to 29/77 (37.7%) of women who did not plan a VBB. Admission rates to a neonatal unit were similar, 4/97 (4.1%) versus 3/77 (3.9%). In this cohort, there was no severe neonatal morbidity following planned VBB, compared to 3/77 (3.9%) among the cohort who did not plan a vaginal breech birth and 2/52 (3.7%) among women who planned a cephalic birth. Severe maternal morbidity following planned VBB was 7/89 (7.9%), compared to 9/76 (11.8%) for women who did not plan a VBB and 8/54 (14.8%) for women who planned a cephalic birth. Conclusions Planning a VBB with OptiBreech collaborative care has thus far been as safe as not planning a VBB. Detecting differences in rare outcomes will require thousands of births. Outcomes will continue to be monitored and reported here as the cohort grows.
采用 OptiBreech 协作护理计划阴道臀位分娩的安全性如何?
背景 OptiBreech 协作护理是针对临产臀先露的多学科护理路径。OptiBreech 多重试验队列的设计是为了主持与臀先露护理相关的多项试验。通过这种设计,可以对大量计划阴道臀位分娩(VBB)的妇女进行前瞻性数据收集,以评估罕见的安全性结果,同时回答需要嵌套在该队列中的较小随机样本的问题。方法 OptiBreech 数据库目前包含从 2022 年 1 月 10 日开始招募的参与者,其中包括 67 名随机接受 OptiBreech 护理或标准护理的妇女,以及 116 名接受 OptiBreech 护理但未被随机分配的妇女。主要结果包括阴道分娩率、新生儿综合发病率和死亡率以及产妇新生儿综合发病率和死亡率。用 SPSS 29 版对整个队列进行了描述性统计分析。通过参与者参与和参与工作,确定了对支持知情决策非常重要的分组分析。结果 在97名计划在任何时候进行VBB分娩的产妇中,有44人(45.4%)实现了阴道分娩,而在77名未计划进行VBB分娩的产妇中,有29人(37.7%)实现了阴道分娩。新生儿科住院率相似,分别为 4/97 (4.1%) 和 3/77 (3.9%)。在该队列中,计划阴道臀位分娩的产妇没有发生严重的新生儿疾病,而未计划阴道臀位分娩的产妇为 3/77 (3.9%),计划头位分娩的产妇为 2/52 (3.7%)。计划阴道臀位分娩后产妇严重发病率为 7/89(7.9%),而未计划阴道臀位分娩的产妇为 9/76(11.8%),计划头位分娩的产妇为 8/54(14.8%)。结论 到目前为止,使用 OptiBreech 协作护理计划 VBB 与未计划 VBB 一样安全。要检测罕见结果的差异,需要进行数千例分娩。随着队列的扩大,我们将继续对结果进行监测和报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信