M. Mureșan, J. Vanda, Saulius Pakalnis, Martin Mydlář, J. Brajer
{"title":"Influence of laser beam size on the determination of LIDT","authors":"M. Mureșan, J. Vanda, Saulius Pakalnis, Martin Mydlář, J. Brajer","doi":"10.1117/12.2686177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With numerous manufacturers providing different laser-induced damage threshold (LIDT) values in the nanosecond regime, a simple ranking based on numbers alone may not provide a clear picture of the best choice. Variations in testing procedures, albeit following the ISO 21254 standard, further complicate the selection process. By employing a comprehensive 1-on-1 test procedure, it becomes possible to observe various parameters that influence LIDT values. When sharing test results within the community, adhering to good practices and meticulous attention to the error budget and its contributors are crucial. Above all, laser optics users must comprehend the intricacies of laser-induced damage testing and seek detailed information instead of relying solely on numerical comparisons. This study explores the challenges and considerations in selecting and testing laser optics, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive approach.","PeriodicalId":202227,"journal":{"name":"Laser Damage","volume":"227 7","pages":"127260H - 127260H-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laser Damage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2686177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With numerous manufacturers providing different laser-induced damage threshold (LIDT) values in the nanosecond regime, a simple ranking based on numbers alone may not provide a clear picture of the best choice. Variations in testing procedures, albeit following the ISO 21254 standard, further complicate the selection process. By employing a comprehensive 1-on-1 test procedure, it becomes possible to observe various parameters that influence LIDT values. When sharing test results within the community, adhering to good practices and meticulous attention to the error budget and its contributors are crucial. Above all, laser optics users must comprehend the intricacies of laser-induced damage testing and seek detailed information instead of relying solely on numerical comparisons. This study explores the challenges and considerations in selecting and testing laser optics, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive approach.
由于众多制造商提供的纳秒级激光诱导损伤阈值(LIDT)各不相同,仅根据数字进行简单的排序可能无法清楚地说明最佳选择。尽管测试程序遵循 ISO 21254 标准,但其中的差异使选择过程更加复杂。通过采用全面的 1 对 1 测试程序,可以观察到影响 LIDT 值的各种参数。在社区内共享测试结果时,遵守良好的操作规范、仔细关注误差预算及其影响因素至关重要。最重要的是,激光光学用户必须了解激光诱导损伤测试的复杂性,并寻求详细信息,而不是仅仅依赖数字比较。本研究探讨了选择和测试激光光学器件的挑战和注意事项,强调了综合方法的重要性。