Neurostimulation as a potential modality for transitioning patients with chronic refractory pain syndromes off opioid analgesics: A systematic review

Kyle Blalock, Ngozi C Mezu-Patel, Nina Mezu-Nwaba
{"title":"Neurostimulation as a potential modality for transitioning patients with chronic refractory pain syndromes off opioid analgesics: A systematic review","authors":"Kyle Blalock, Ngozi C Mezu-Patel, Nina Mezu-Nwaba","doi":"10.25259/ajpps_2023_020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opioid analgesics are mu-opioid agonists used in practice for pain management which pose significant health risks including, but not limited to, abuse, dependence, respiratory depression, overdose, and death. Medical devices such as spinal cord stimulators (SCS) – which fall under the category of neurostimulators – may offer an alternative method for pain management. Four searches were conducted on PubMed and the Cochrane Trials database to assess the effects neurostimulation has on opioid consumption. Sixty-two (62) unique results originally populated, and six studies out of the 62 results met inclusion criteria. One result was a neurophysiological study which found transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) decreased mu-opioid receptor availability (P < 0.001), thereby suggesting TMS may activate the release of endogenous opioids. Five results were clinical studies utilizing SCS for chronic pain. These five studies cumulatively enrolled 330 participants, 57 of which were withdrawn and 139 of which were using opioids at the time of enrollment. Following neurostimulation, 41% of participants discontinued opioid use altogether, 26.6% of participants decreased opioid use, 26.6% of participants remained on the same opioid dose, and 5.8% of participants increased opioid use. Overall opioid use decreased by an estimated 45.6% ± 13 following SCS. The median trial duration was 1 year, and the median sample size was 23 participants. Although the results unanimously showed effectiveness for pain control and opioid dose reductions, the studies in this review were small, and none were placebo-controlled. The statistical fallbacks of the five SCS studies make it difficult to draw concrete conclusions. More research is needed to ascertain the risk-benefit profiles of neurostimulators in chronic pain patients.","PeriodicalId":376259,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ajpps_2023_020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Opioid analgesics are mu-opioid agonists used in practice for pain management which pose significant health risks including, but not limited to, abuse, dependence, respiratory depression, overdose, and death. Medical devices such as spinal cord stimulators (SCS) – which fall under the category of neurostimulators – may offer an alternative method for pain management. Four searches were conducted on PubMed and the Cochrane Trials database to assess the effects neurostimulation has on opioid consumption. Sixty-two (62) unique results originally populated, and six studies out of the 62 results met inclusion criteria. One result was a neurophysiological study which found transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) decreased mu-opioid receptor availability (P < 0.001), thereby suggesting TMS may activate the release of endogenous opioids. Five results were clinical studies utilizing SCS for chronic pain. These five studies cumulatively enrolled 330 participants, 57 of which were withdrawn and 139 of which were using opioids at the time of enrollment. Following neurostimulation, 41% of participants discontinued opioid use altogether, 26.6% of participants decreased opioid use, 26.6% of participants remained on the same opioid dose, and 5.8% of participants increased opioid use. Overall opioid use decreased by an estimated 45.6% ± 13 following SCS. The median trial duration was 1 year, and the median sample size was 23 participants. Although the results unanimously showed effectiveness for pain control and opioid dose reductions, the studies in this review were small, and none were placebo-controlled. The statistical fallbacks of the five SCS studies make it difficult to draw concrete conclusions. More research is needed to ascertain the risk-benefit profiles of neurostimulators in chronic pain patients.
神经刺激是慢性难治性疼痛综合征患者脱离阿片类镇痛药的一种潜在方式:系统综述
阿片类镇痛药是用于疼痛治疗的μ-阿片类激动剂,具有很大的健康风险,包括但不限于滥用、依赖、呼吸抑制、用药过量和死亡。脊髓刺激器(SCS)等医疗设备属于神经刺激器的范畴,可作为疼痛治疗的替代方法。我们在 PubMed 和 Cochrane 试验数据库中进行了四次检索,以评估神经刺激对阿片类药物消耗的影响。最初共搜索到 62 项独特的结果,其中有 6 项研究符合纳入标准。其中一项是神经生理学研究,该研究发现经颅磁刺激(TMS)会降低μ阿片受体的可用性(P < 0.001),从而表明TMS可能会激活内源性阿片类药物的释放。五项成果是利用 SCS 治疗慢性疼痛的临床研究。这五项研究共招募了 330 名参与者,其中 57 人退出研究,139 人在招募时正在使用阿片类药物。神经刺激后,41% 的参与者完全停止使用阿片类药物,26.6% 的参与者减少了阿片类药物的使用,26.6% 的参与者保持相同的阿片类药物剂量,5.8% 的参与者增加了阿片类药物的使用。SCS 后,阿片类药物的总体使用量估计减少了 45.6% ± 13。试验持续时间中位数为 1 年,样本量中位数为 23 人。尽管研究结果一致显示了控制疼痛和减少阿片类药物剂量的有效性,但本综述中的研究规模较小,且均未进行安慰剂对照。五项 SCS 研究在统计学上存在缺陷,因此很难得出具体结论。需要进行更多的研究,以确定神经刺激器对慢性疼痛患者的风险效益情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信