Cement and concrete decarbonisation roadmaps – a meta-analysis within the context of the United Kingdom

Q2 Engineering
Alastair Marsh, Thomas Dillon, Susan A. Bernal
{"title":"Cement and concrete decarbonisation roadmaps – a meta-analysis within the context of the United Kingdom","authors":"Alastair Marsh, Thomas Dillon, Susan A. Bernal","doi":"10.21809/rilemtechlett.2023.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decarbonisation is the most urgent issue facing the cement and concrete industries, with an aim to reach net-zero carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. In response to this, several decarbonisation roadmaps have been published in recent years, to explore routes for how different decarbonisation strategies can be used to achieve this aim. However, there is a lack of understanding around the similarities and differences between these roadmaps. In this study a meta-analysis of nine cement and concrete sector roadmaps was conducted, with a detailed focus on five roadmaps covering Europe emphasising their applicability within the context of the United Kingdom. Whilst there are some similarities amongst roadmaps in terms of the decarbonisation strategies which are consistently recommended, there are also key differences. Industry roadmaps oriented towards cement-based strategies, whilst non-industry roadmaps were more inclusive of concrete-based strategies. The significance of this study is to highlight the difficulties faced by policymakers and investors in choosing which strategies to prioritise, when there is still considerable uncertainty in the roadmap literature. Recommendations are made for a greater focus on consideration of the construction sector practices which provide more autonomy to practitioners to adopt and implement concrete-based strategies and dematerialisation in future iterations of industry roadmaps, and more research into the capital and operating costs of technological innovations","PeriodicalId":36420,"journal":{"name":"RILEM Technical Letters","volume":"3 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RILEM Technical Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2023.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decarbonisation is the most urgent issue facing the cement and concrete industries, with an aim to reach net-zero carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. In response to this, several decarbonisation roadmaps have been published in recent years, to explore routes for how different decarbonisation strategies can be used to achieve this aim. However, there is a lack of understanding around the similarities and differences between these roadmaps. In this study a meta-analysis of nine cement and concrete sector roadmaps was conducted, with a detailed focus on five roadmaps covering Europe emphasising their applicability within the context of the United Kingdom. Whilst there are some similarities amongst roadmaps in terms of the decarbonisation strategies which are consistently recommended, there are also key differences. Industry roadmaps oriented towards cement-based strategies, whilst non-industry roadmaps were more inclusive of concrete-based strategies. The significance of this study is to highlight the difficulties faced by policymakers and investors in choosing which strategies to prioritise, when there is still considerable uncertainty in the roadmap literature. Recommendations are made for a greater focus on consideration of the construction sector practices which provide more autonomy to practitioners to adopt and implement concrete-based strategies and dematerialisation in future iterations of industry roadmaps, and more research into the capital and operating costs of technological innovations
水泥和混凝土脱碳路线图--在英国范围内进行的元分析
脱碳是水泥和混凝土行业面临的最紧迫问题,其目标是到2050年实现二氧化碳净零排放。为此,近年来发布了多个脱碳路线图,探索如何利用不同的脱碳战略来实现这一目标。然而,人们对这些路线图之间的异同缺乏了解。本研究对九个水泥和混凝土行业路线图进行了荟萃分析,重点分析了欧洲的五个路线图,强调了它们在英国的适用性。虽然各路线图在一致推荐的脱碳战略方面有一些相似之处,但也存在关键差异。行业路线图倾向于以水泥为基础的战略,而非行业路线图则更多地包含以混凝土为基础的战略。本研究的意义在于强调决策者和投资者在选择优先考虑哪些战略时所面临的困难,因为路线图文献中仍存在相当大的不确定性。建议在未来的行业路线图迭代中,更加注重考虑建筑行业的实践,为从业人员采用和实施基于混凝土的战略和非物质化提供更多自主权,并对技术创新的资本和运营成本进行更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RILEM Technical Letters
RILEM Technical Letters Materials Science-Materials Science (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信