Strengthening Customary Forest Rights for Indigenous People in Indonesia Green Constitution Framework

Xavier Nugraha, Angelica Milano Aryani Wibisono, Alissa Angelia, Bryan Owen S., Putri Riska Answendy
{"title":"Strengthening Customary Forest Rights for Indigenous People in Indonesia Green Constitution Framework","authors":"Xavier Nugraha, Angelica Milano Aryani Wibisono, Alissa Angelia, Bryan Owen S., Putri Riska Answendy","doi":"10.19184/jkph.v3i2.43367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ongoing struggle of indigenous people fighting for their rights to preserve the customary forests underscores the critical need to protect both cultural heritage and environment. This research focuses on implementing the Green Constitution in Indonesia, aiming to strengthen the existence of indigenous peoples and their customary rights to customary forests. However, there are significant problems with Article 33(3) of the 1945 Constitution which emphasizes the welfare of the people through the exploitation of natural resources, often neglecting aspects of environmental conservation and contradicting Indonesia's commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As a result, the Indonesian Constitution has an anthropocentric orientation that prioritizes environmental preservation for human interests rather than fully reflecting the Green Constitution principles that emphasize environmental sustainability in line with human needs. The research used in this study is juridical-normative approach to analyze the law and relevant regulation regarding the issue at hand to identify possible solution towards the existing legal issues. This research identifies two main problems: first, to what extent the 1945 Constitution reflects the principles of the Green Constitution, and second, how efforts to strengthen the rights of indigenous peoples to customary forests reflect the Green Constitution. The results show that the 1945 Constitution has not fully adopted the principles of the Green Constitution, therefore measures are needed to strengthen the rights of indigenous peoples related to customary forests, including the elimination of conditional recognition through judicial interpretation of Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution, to secure environmental conservation democratically and sustainably.","PeriodicalId":313528,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v3i2.43367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ongoing struggle of indigenous people fighting for their rights to preserve the customary forests underscores the critical need to protect both cultural heritage and environment. This research focuses on implementing the Green Constitution in Indonesia, aiming to strengthen the existence of indigenous peoples and their customary rights to customary forests. However, there are significant problems with Article 33(3) of the 1945 Constitution which emphasizes the welfare of the people through the exploitation of natural resources, often neglecting aspects of environmental conservation and contradicting Indonesia's commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As a result, the Indonesian Constitution has an anthropocentric orientation that prioritizes environmental preservation for human interests rather than fully reflecting the Green Constitution principles that emphasize environmental sustainability in line with human needs. The research used in this study is juridical-normative approach to analyze the law and relevant regulation regarding the issue at hand to identify possible solution towards the existing legal issues. This research identifies two main problems: first, to what extent the 1945 Constitution reflects the principles of the Green Constitution, and second, how efforts to strengthen the rights of indigenous peoples to customary forests reflect the Green Constitution. The results show that the 1945 Constitution has not fully adopted the principles of the Green Constitution, therefore measures are needed to strengthen the rights of indigenous peoples related to customary forests, including the elimination of conditional recognition through judicial interpretation of Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution, to secure environmental conservation democratically and sustainably.
加强印度尼西亚土著人民的传统森林权利 绿色宪法框架
原住民为保护传统森林的权利而不断斗争,这凸显了保护文化遗产和环境的迫切需要。本研究的重点是在印度尼西亚实施绿色宪法,旨在加强原住民的存在及其对传统森林的传统权利。然而,1945 年《宪法》第 33(3)条存在重大问题,该条强调通过开发自然资源为人民谋福利,往往忽视了环境保护的各个方面,与印尼对可持续发展目标(SDGs)的承诺相矛盾。因此,印尼宪法以人类为中心,优先考虑为人类利益保护环境,而不是充分体现绿色宪法的原则,即强调环境可持续性符合人类需求。本研究采用司法-规范方法来分析与当前问题相关的法律和相关法规,以确定解决现有法律问题的可行方案。本研究确定了两个主要问题:第一,1945 年《宪法》在多大程度上体现了《绿色宪法》的原则;第二,为加强土著人民对传统森林的权利所做的努力如何体现了《绿色宪法》。研究结果表明,1945 年《宪法》并未完全采纳《绿色宪法》的原则,因此需要采取措施加强土著人民与习惯森林有关的权利,包括通过对 1945 年《宪法》第 18B 条第 2 款的司法解释消除有条件的承认,以民主和可持续的方式确保环境保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信