Empirical Analysis of Decision Recommendation Models for Various Processes from A Pragmatic Perspective

Priyanka Gonnade, Sonali Ridhorkar
{"title":"Empirical Analysis of Decision Recommendation Models for Various Processes from A Pragmatic Perspective","authors":"Priyanka Gonnade, Sonali Ridhorkar","doi":"10.37745/bjmas.2022.0358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision recommendation models allow researchers and process designers to identify & implement high-efficiency processes under ambiguous situations. These models perform multiparametric analysis on the given process sets in order to recommend high quality decisions that assist in improving process-based efficiency levels. A wide variety of models are proposed by researchers for implementation of such recommenders, and each of them varies in terms of their functional nuances, applicative advantages, internal operating characteristics, contextual limitations, and deployment-specific future scopes. Thus, it is difficult for researchers and process designers to identify optimal models for their functionality-specific use cases. Due to which, they tend to validate multiple process models, which increases deployment time, cost & complexity levels.To overcome this ambiguity, a detailed survey of different decision process recommendation models is discussed in this text. It was observed that Fuzzy Logic, Analytical Hierarchical Processing (AHP), Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and their variants are highly useful for recommendation of efficient decisions. Based on this survey, readers will be able to identify recently proposed decision recommendation models, and identify functionality-specific models for their deployments. To further assist the model selection process, this text compares the reviewed models in terms of their computational complexity, efficiency of recommendation, delay needed for recommendation, scalability and contextual accuracy levels. Based on this comparison, readers will be able to identify performance-specific models for their deployments. This text also proposes evaluation of a novel Decision Recommendation Rank Metric (DRRM), which combines these parameters, in order to identify models that can optimally perform w.r.t. multiple process metrics. Referring to this parameter comparison, readers will be able to identify optimal recommendation models for enhancing performance of their decision recommendations under real-time scenarios.","PeriodicalId":421703,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decision recommendation models allow researchers and process designers to identify & implement high-efficiency processes under ambiguous situations. These models perform multiparametric analysis on the given process sets in order to recommend high quality decisions that assist in improving process-based efficiency levels. A wide variety of models are proposed by researchers for implementation of such recommenders, and each of them varies in terms of their functional nuances, applicative advantages, internal operating characteristics, contextual limitations, and deployment-specific future scopes. Thus, it is difficult for researchers and process designers to identify optimal models for their functionality-specific use cases. Due to which, they tend to validate multiple process models, which increases deployment time, cost & complexity levels.To overcome this ambiguity, a detailed survey of different decision process recommendation models is discussed in this text. It was observed that Fuzzy Logic, Analytical Hierarchical Processing (AHP), Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and their variants are highly useful for recommendation of efficient decisions. Based on this survey, readers will be able to identify recently proposed decision recommendation models, and identify functionality-specific models for their deployments. To further assist the model selection process, this text compares the reviewed models in terms of their computational complexity, efficiency of recommendation, delay needed for recommendation, scalability and contextual accuracy levels. Based on this comparison, readers will be able to identify performance-specific models for their deployments. This text also proposes evaluation of a novel Decision Recommendation Rank Metric (DRRM), which combines these parameters, in order to identify models that can optimally perform w.r.t. multiple process metrics. Referring to this parameter comparison, readers will be able to identify optimal recommendation models for enhancing performance of their decision recommendations under real-time scenarios.
从实用角度对各种流程的决策建议模型进行实证分析
决策建议模型使研究人员和流程设计人员能够在模棱两可的情况下识别和实施高效流程。这些模型对给定的流程集进行多参数分析,以推荐有助于提高流程效率水平的高质量决策。研究人员为实施此类推荐器提出了各种各样的模型,每种模型在功能细微差别、应用优势、内部运行特征、背景限制和特定部署的未来范围方面都各不相同。因此,研究人员和流程设计人员很难为其特定功能用例确定最佳模型。为了克服这种模糊性,本文讨论了不同决策流程推荐模型的详细调查。据观察,模糊逻辑(Fuzzy Logic)、层次分析法(Analytical Hierarchical Processing,AHP)、理想解相似性排序技术(Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution,TOPSIS)及其变体对于推荐高效决策非常有用。基于这项调查,读者将能够识别最近提出的决策推荐模型,并确定其部署的特定功能模型。为进一步帮助读者选择模型,本文将从计算复杂性、推荐效率、推荐所需的延迟、可扩展性和上下文准确性水平等方面对已审查的模型进行比较。在比较的基础上,读者将能够为自己的部署确定特定性能的模型。本文还提出了一种新颖的决策推荐等级度量(DRRM)评估方法,该方法将这些参数结合在一起,以确定在多个流程指标方面具有最佳性能的模型。通过参数比较,读者将能够确定最佳推荐模型,从而提高实时场景下决策推荐的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信