Comparative Analysis of Algorithms to Cleanse Soil Micro-Relief Point Clouds

Geomatics Pub Date : 2023-11-26 DOI:10.3390/geomatics3040027
Simone Ott, Benjamin Burkhard, C. Harmening, J. Paffenholz, Bastian Steinhoff-Knopp
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Algorithms to Cleanse Soil Micro-Relief Point Clouds","authors":"Simone Ott, Benjamin Burkhard, C. Harmening, J. Paffenholz, Bastian Steinhoff-Knopp","doi":"10.3390/geomatics3040027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detecting changes in soil micro-relief in farmland helps to understand degradation processes like sheet erosion. Using the high-resolution technique of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), we generated point clouds of three 2 × 3 m plots on a weekly basis from May to mid-June in 2022 on cultivated farmland in Germany. Three well-known applications for eliminating vegetation points in the generated point cloud were tested: Cloth Simulation Filter (CSF) as a filtering method, three variants of CANUPO as a machine learning method, and ArcGIS PointCNN as a deep learning method, a sub-category of machine learning using deep neural networks. We assessed the methods with hard criteria such as F1 score, balanced accuracy, height differences, and their standard deviations to the reference surface, resulting in data gaps and robustness, and with soft criteria such as time-saving capacity, accessibility, and user knowledge. All algorithms showed a low performance at the initial measurement epoch, increasing with later epochs. While most of the results demonstrate a better performance of ArcGIS PointCNN, this algorithm revealed an exceptionally low performance in plot 1, which is describable by the generalization gap. Although CANUPO variants created the highest amount of data gaps, we recommend that CANUPO include colour values in combination with CSF.","PeriodicalId":507594,"journal":{"name":"Geomatics","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geomatics3040027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Detecting changes in soil micro-relief in farmland helps to understand degradation processes like sheet erosion. Using the high-resolution technique of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), we generated point clouds of three 2 × 3 m plots on a weekly basis from May to mid-June in 2022 on cultivated farmland in Germany. Three well-known applications for eliminating vegetation points in the generated point cloud were tested: Cloth Simulation Filter (CSF) as a filtering method, three variants of CANUPO as a machine learning method, and ArcGIS PointCNN as a deep learning method, a sub-category of machine learning using deep neural networks. We assessed the methods with hard criteria such as F1 score, balanced accuracy, height differences, and their standard deviations to the reference surface, resulting in data gaps and robustness, and with soft criteria such as time-saving capacity, accessibility, and user knowledge. All algorithms showed a low performance at the initial measurement epoch, increasing with later epochs. While most of the results demonstrate a better performance of ArcGIS PointCNN, this algorithm revealed an exceptionally low performance in plot 1, which is describable by the generalization gap. Although CANUPO variants created the highest amount of data gaps, we recommend that CANUPO include colour values in combination with CSF.
净化土壤微救济点云算法的比较分析
检测农田土壤微凹凸的变化有助于了解片蚀等退化过程。利用高分辨率地面激光扫描(TLS)技术,我们于 2022 年 5 月至 6 月中旬在德国的耕地上每周生成三个 2 × 3 米地块的点云。我们测试了用于消除生成点云中植被点的三种著名应用:布模拟过滤器(CSF)是一种过滤方法,CANUPO 的三种变体是一种机器学习方法,ArcGIS PointCNN 是一种深度学习方法(使用深度神经网络的机器学习的一个子类别)。我们以 F1 分数、平衡精度、高度差及其与参考面的标准偏差等硬性标准,以及省时能力、可访问性和用户知识等软性标准,对这些方法进行了评估。所有算法在最初的测量时间段都表现出较低的性能,但随着时间的推移,性能逐渐提高。虽然大多数结果表明 ArcGIS PointCNN 的性能更好,但该算法在图 1 中的性能特别低,这可以用泛化差距来描述。虽然 CANUPO 变体产生的数据差距最大,但我们建议 CANUPO 结合 CSF 使用颜色值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信