An automated approach for the kidney segmentation and detection of kidney stones on computed tomography using YOLO algorithms

Salman Rabby, Farhad Hossain, Shuvro Das, Imdadur Rahman, Srejon Das, J. Soeb, Md. Fahad Jubaye
{"title":"An automated approach for the kidney segmentation and detection of kidney stones on computed tomography using YOLO algorithms","authors":"Salman Rabby, Farhad Hossain, Shuvro Das, Imdadur Rahman, Srejon Das, J. Soeb, Md. Fahad Jubaye","doi":"10.47108/jidhealth.vol6.iss4.313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: For effective diagnosis and treatment planning, accurate segmentation of the kidneys and detection of kidney stones are crucial. Traditional procedures are time-consuming and subject to observer variation. This study proposes an automated method employing YOLO algorithms for renal segmentation and kidney stone detection on CT scans to address these issues. Methods: The dataset used in this study was sourced from the GitHub. The dataset contains a total of 1799 images, with 790 images labeled as 'containing kidney stones' and 1009 images labeled as 'not containing kidney stones'. U-Net architecture was utilized to precisely identify the region of interest, while YOLOv5 and YOLOv7 architecture was utilized to detect the stones. In addition, a performance comparison between the two YOLO models and other contemporary relevant models has been conducted. Results: We obtained a kidney segmentation IOU of 91.4% and kidney stone detection accuracies of 99.5% for YOLOv7 and 98.7% for YOLOv5. YOLOv5 and YOLOv7 outperform the best existing models, including CNN, KNN, SVM, Kronecker CNN, Xresnet50, VGG16, etc. YOLOv7 possesses superior accuracy than YOLOv5. The only issue we encountered with the YOLOv7 model was that it demanded more training time than the YOLOv5 model. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that the proposed AI-based method has the potential to improve clinical procedures, allowing radiologists and urologists to make well-informed decisions for patients with renal pathologies. As medical imaging technology progresses, the incorporation of deep learning techniques such as YOLO holds promise for additional advances in automated diagnosis and treatment planning.","PeriodicalId":365684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ideas in Health","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ideas in Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47108/jidhealth.vol6.iss4.313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For effective diagnosis and treatment planning, accurate segmentation of the kidneys and detection of kidney stones are crucial. Traditional procedures are time-consuming and subject to observer variation. This study proposes an automated method employing YOLO algorithms for renal segmentation and kidney stone detection on CT scans to address these issues. Methods: The dataset used in this study was sourced from the GitHub. The dataset contains a total of 1799 images, with 790 images labeled as 'containing kidney stones' and 1009 images labeled as 'not containing kidney stones'. U-Net architecture was utilized to precisely identify the region of interest, while YOLOv5 and YOLOv7 architecture was utilized to detect the stones. In addition, a performance comparison between the two YOLO models and other contemporary relevant models has been conducted. Results: We obtained a kidney segmentation IOU of 91.4% and kidney stone detection accuracies of 99.5% for YOLOv7 and 98.7% for YOLOv5. YOLOv5 and YOLOv7 outperform the best existing models, including CNN, KNN, SVM, Kronecker CNN, Xresnet50, VGG16, etc. YOLOv7 possesses superior accuracy than YOLOv5. The only issue we encountered with the YOLOv7 model was that it demanded more training time than the YOLOv5 model. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that the proposed AI-based method has the potential to improve clinical procedures, allowing radiologists and urologists to make well-informed decisions for patients with renal pathologies. As medical imaging technology progresses, the incorporation of deep learning techniques such as YOLO holds promise for additional advances in automated diagnosis and treatment planning.
利用 YOLO 算法在计算机断层扫描中自动分割肾脏并检测肾结石的方法
背景:为了有效诊断和制定治疗计划,准确分割肾脏和检测肾结石至关重要。传统程序耗时长,且受观察者差异的影响。为解决这些问题,本研究提出了一种采用 YOLO 算法对 CT 扫描进行肾脏分割和肾结石检测的自动化方法。 方法:本研究使用的数据集来自 GitHub。该数据集共包含 1799 张图像,其中 790 张标记为 "含有肾结石",1009 张标记为 "不含肾结石"。U-Net 架构用于精确识别感兴趣区域,而 YOLOv5 和 YOLOv7 架构则用于检测结石。此外,还对两个 YOLO 模型和其他当代相关模型进行了性能比较。 结果:我们获得了 91.4% 的肾脏分割 IOU,YOLOv7 和 YOLOv5 的肾结石检测准确率分别为 99.5% 和 98.7%。YOLOv5 和 YOLOv7 优于现有的最佳模型,包括 CNN、KNN、SVM、Kronecker CNN、Xresnet50、VGG16 等。YOLOv7 比 YOLOv5 具有更高的准确性。我们在 YOLOv7 模型中遇到的唯一问题是,它比 YOLOv5 模型需要更多的训练时间。 结论研究结果表明,所提出的基于人工智能的方法具有改善临床程序的潜力,可让放射科医生和泌尿科医生为肾病患者做出明智的决定。随着医学影像技术的发展,YOLO 等深度学习技术的应用有望在自动诊断和治疗规划方面取得更多进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信