A salutary welcome: the role of Sense of Coherence and Generalized Resistance Resources in refugee settlement

Christopher J. Fries, John Serieux, Nelson Oranye
{"title":"A salutary welcome: the role of Sense of Coherence and Generalized Resistance Resources in refugee settlement","authors":"Christopher J. Fries, John Serieux, Nelson Oranye","doi":"10.1108/ijmhsc-07-2022-0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Guided by the salutogenic model of health and well-being, this study aims to use empirical measures of sense of coherence (SOC) and generalized resistance resources (GRRs) to gain a better understanding of the facilitators of successful transition and integration of refugees to Canada and relate these findings to current program development and delivery for the settlement of refugees. Design/methodology/approach Survey research and structural equation modeling. Findings The authors found that newcomers with a stronger SOC were more likely to report successful integration outcomes. GRRs were found to have both direct and indirect effects on the positive settlement of refugees, with the SOC acting as a strong mediator of indirect effects. Research limitations/implications Owing in part, to the disruption caused by the global pandemic, the authors’ data collection period was protracted and the final sample size of 263 is smaller than the authors would have preferred. Another limitation of this study has to do with its cross-sectional design, which limits the articulation of cause-and-effect relationships among the variables. Practical implications In terms of program development and delivery for the settlement of refugees, the authors’ results provide further evidence that refugee participation in socially valued decision-making represents a key determinant of healthy resettlement. Originality/value Much research on refugee settlement originates within “a pathogenic paradigm” that focuses on the stressors and obstacles encountered by people who have been displaced. Taking its cue from Israeli health sociologist, Aaron Antonovsky’s salutogenic model of health and well-being, this study uses empirical measures of Antonovsky’s interrelated concepts of SOC and GRRs to gain a better understanding of the facilitators of successful transition and integration of refugees to a prairie province in Canada and relate these findings to current program development and delivery for the settlement of refugees.","PeriodicalId":503778,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care","volume":"282 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmhsc-07-2022-0070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Guided by the salutogenic model of health and well-being, this study aims to use empirical measures of sense of coherence (SOC) and generalized resistance resources (GRRs) to gain a better understanding of the facilitators of successful transition and integration of refugees to Canada and relate these findings to current program development and delivery for the settlement of refugees. Design/methodology/approach Survey research and structural equation modeling. Findings The authors found that newcomers with a stronger SOC were more likely to report successful integration outcomes. GRRs were found to have both direct and indirect effects on the positive settlement of refugees, with the SOC acting as a strong mediator of indirect effects. Research limitations/implications Owing in part, to the disruption caused by the global pandemic, the authors’ data collection period was protracted and the final sample size of 263 is smaller than the authors would have preferred. Another limitation of this study has to do with its cross-sectional design, which limits the articulation of cause-and-effect relationships among the variables. Practical implications In terms of program development and delivery for the settlement of refugees, the authors’ results provide further evidence that refugee participation in socially valued decision-making represents a key determinant of healthy resettlement. Originality/value Much research on refugee settlement originates within “a pathogenic paradigm” that focuses on the stressors and obstacles encountered by people who have been displaced. Taking its cue from Israeli health sociologist, Aaron Antonovsky’s salutogenic model of health and well-being, this study uses empirical measures of Antonovsky’s interrelated concepts of SOC and GRRs to gain a better understanding of the facilitators of successful transition and integration of refugees to a prairie province in Canada and relate these findings to current program development and delivery for the settlement of refugees.
有益的欢迎:凝聚感和普遍抵抗资源在难民安置中的作用
目的 本研究以健康和幸福的致敬模式为指导,旨在使用一致性感(SOC)和广义抵抗资源(GRRs)的实证测量方法,更好地了解难民成功过渡和融入加拿大的促进因素,并将这些发现与当前难民安置计划的制定和实施联系起来。 设计/方法/途径 调查研究和结构方程模型。 研究结果 作者发现,SOC较强的新移民更有可能报告成功的融合结果。研究发现,GRRs 对难民的积极定居既有直接影响,也有间接影响,而 SOC 是间接影响的有力中介。 研究局限性/启示 由于全球大流行病造成的部分混乱,作者的数据收集期延长,最终 263 个样本的规模比作者希望的要小。本研究的另一个局限性在于其横截面设计,这限制了变量之间因果关系的阐述。 实际意义 在难民安置计划的制定和实施方面,作者的研究结果进一步证明,难民参与社会有价值的决策是健康安置的关键因素。 原创性/价值 有关难民安置的许多研究都源于 "致病范式",即关注流离失所者所遇到的压力和障碍。本研究从以色列健康社会学家亚伦-安东诺夫斯基(Aaron Antonovsky)的健康和幸福致敬模型中汲取灵感,利用安东诺夫斯基的 "社会责任"(SOC)和 "社会价值链"(GRRs)这两个相互关联的概念的实证测量方法,更好地了解难民成功过渡和融入加拿大草原省份的促进因素,并将这些发现与当前的难民安置项目开发和实施相联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信