Disease Response Assessment Modalities in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Past, Present, and Future

IF 0.3 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Deepak Kumar Mishra, Indranil Dey, Rakesh Demde, S. Vinarkar, M. Parihar
{"title":"Disease Response Assessment Modalities in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Past, Present, and Future","authors":"Deepak Kumar Mishra, Indranil Dey, Rakesh Demde, S. Vinarkar, M. Parihar","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm caused by the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene, which results from a reciprocal translocation between chromosome 9 and 22 t(9;22)(q34;q11). The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) against the chimeric BCR::ABL1 fusion protein has led to a paradigm shift in CML patient outcomes. Despite generational advancements in TKI, a fraction of patients harbor residual disease or exhibit resistance to TKI. The importance of disease monitoring and detection of resistance mechanisms has gained prominence with increasing knowledge about disease evolution. In the past, cytogenetic techniques such as karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization were widely utilized for monitoring disease and prognostication. These techniques had various challenges related to limited sensitivity in minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring; however, their importance still holds in the detection of additional chromosomal aberrations and in cases with cryptic insertions, variants, and masked Philadelphia chromosome. Molecular genetics has evolved significantly from the past to the present times for MRD monitoring in CML patients. Qualitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) can be performed at diagnosis to detect the BCR::ABL1 transcript, while quantitative RQ-PCR is the most widely used and well-standardized MRD monitoring method. The DNA-based assays demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, with many efforts directed toward making the laborious step of BCR::ABL1 breakpoint characterization less tedious to increase the utility of DNA-based MRD approach in the future. Flow cytometric–based approaches for the detection of the BCR::ABL1 fusion protein have been under trial with a scope of becoming a more robust and convenient methodology for monitoring in the future. Upcoming techniques such as digital PCR and ultra-deep sequencing next-generation sequencing (UDS-NGS) have shown promising results in residual disease monitoring and detection of resistance mutations. Novel MRD monitoring systems that are independent of BCR::ABL1 fusion such as the detection of CD26+ leukemic stem cells and microRNA mutations are the future of residual disease monitoring, which can go up to the level of a single cell. In this review, we tried to discuss the evolution of most of the above-mentioned techniques encompassing the pros, cons, utility, and challenges for MRD monitoring and detection of TKI resistance mutations.","PeriodicalId":13513,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology","volume":"7 1","pages":"592 - 601"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm caused by the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene, which results from a reciprocal translocation between chromosome 9 and 22 t(9;22)(q34;q11). The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) against the chimeric BCR::ABL1 fusion protein has led to a paradigm shift in CML patient outcomes. Despite generational advancements in TKI, a fraction of patients harbor residual disease or exhibit resistance to TKI. The importance of disease monitoring and detection of resistance mechanisms has gained prominence with increasing knowledge about disease evolution. In the past, cytogenetic techniques such as karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization were widely utilized for monitoring disease and prognostication. These techniques had various challenges related to limited sensitivity in minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring; however, their importance still holds in the detection of additional chromosomal aberrations and in cases with cryptic insertions, variants, and masked Philadelphia chromosome. Molecular genetics has evolved significantly from the past to the present times for MRD monitoring in CML patients. Qualitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) can be performed at diagnosis to detect the BCR::ABL1 transcript, while quantitative RQ-PCR is the most widely used and well-standardized MRD monitoring method. The DNA-based assays demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, with many efforts directed toward making the laborious step of BCR::ABL1 breakpoint characterization less tedious to increase the utility of DNA-based MRD approach in the future. Flow cytometric–based approaches for the detection of the BCR::ABL1 fusion protein have been under trial with a scope of becoming a more robust and convenient methodology for monitoring in the future. Upcoming techniques such as digital PCR and ultra-deep sequencing next-generation sequencing (UDS-NGS) have shown promising results in residual disease monitoring and detection of resistance mutations. Novel MRD monitoring systems that are independent of BCR::ABL1 fusion such as the detection of CD26+ leukemic stem cells and microRNA mutations are the future of residual disease monitoring, which can go up to the level of a single cell. In this review, we tried to discuss the evolution of most of the above-mentioned techniques encompassing the pros, cons, utility, and challenges for MRD monitoring and detection of TKI resistance mutations.
慢性髓性白血病的疾病反应评估模式:过去、现在和未来
摘要 慢性髓性白血病(CML)是一种骨髓增生性肿瘤,由BCR::ABL1融合基因引起,而BCR::ABL1融合基因是由9号染色体和22号染色体之间的t(9;22)(q34;q11)互变引起的。针对嵌合型 BCR::ABL1 融合蛋白的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)的使用导致了 CML 患者治疗模式的转变。尽管酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)取得了一代又一代的进步,但仍有一部分患者存在残留疾病或对TKI表现出耐药性。随着对疾病演变的认识不断加深,疾病监测和耐药机制检测的重要性日益突出。过去,核型分析和荧光原位杂交等细胞遗传学技术被广泛用于监测疾病和预后。然而,这些技术在检测额外的染色体畸变、隐性插入、变异和被掩盖的费城染色体病例中仍具有重要意义。从过去到现在,分子遗传学在监测 CML 患者的 MRD 方面有了长足的发展。定性反转录聚合酶链反应(RQ-PCR)可在诊断时检测 BCR::ABL1 转录本,而定量 RQ-PCR 则是应用最广泛、最标准的 MRD 监测方法。基于DNA的检测方法具有高灵敏度和特异性,许多人都在努力减少BCR::ABL1断点表征这一繁琐步骤,以提高基于DNA的MRD方法在未来的实用性。基于流式细胞仪的 BCR::ABL1 融合蛋白检测方法正在试验中,有望在未来成为一种更强大、更方便的监测方法。数字 PCR 和超深度测序新一代测序(UDS-NGS)等新技术在残留疾病监测和耐药突变检测方面显示出良好的效果。独立于BCR::ABL1融合的新型MRD监测系统,如CD26+白血病干细胞和microRNA突变的检测,是残留疾病监测的未来趋势,可达到单细胞水平。在这篇综述中,我们试图讨论上述大多数技术的演变,包括 MRD 监测和 TKI 耐药突变检测的利弊、实用性和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to medical and pediatric oncology in human well being including ethical and social issues. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信