The Reconsideration of IFRS Adoption and Audit Fees: Evidence from UK Private Firms

Yu-Lin Hsu, Ni-Yun Chen
{"title":"The Reconsideration of IFRS Adoption and Audit Fees: Evidence from UK Private Firms","authors":"Yu-Lin Hsu, Ni-Yun Chen","doi":"10.1142/s1094406024500033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synopsis The research problem This paper examined whether firms’ decision to switch from the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) to the new Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in the United Kingdom (New UK GAAP) affects their audit fees. Motivation The New UK GAAP was introduced by the UK regulators to enhance the comparability of financial reports and to reduce the high financial reporting costs associated with IFRS. We aimed to provide evidence on whether the reduced frameworks of IFRS, like the New UK GAAP, are a more cost-effective option. Furthermore, only very few studies analyzed the impact of abandoning IFRS on audit fees, and these found inconsistent results using the public firm data. We aimed to extend the current literature by using the private firm data. The test hypotheses Our first set of hypotheses considered whether the switch from IFRS to the New UK GAAP is associated with audit fees. Our second hypothesis tested whether there is a difference in any such association between larger and smaller firms. Target population We focused on the UK private (i.e., nonlisted) firms that have previously voluntarily adopted the IFRS. Adopted methodology We used regression analyses, difference-in-differences (DID) analyses, various matching methods for robustness, and analyses of firms’ financial reports. Analyses Using the UK private (i.e., nonlisted) firm data for the period 2014–2019, we examined the impact of switching from IFRS to the New UK GAAP on audit fees. The data for regression and DID analyses were obtained from the FAME database. We also downloaded the financial reports of two firms from Companies House to analyze the differences in their reports before and after the switch to the New UK GAAP. Findings We found that firms’ decision to switch from IFRS to the New UK GAAP significantly reduced their audit fees, with larger firms experiencing an additional reduction in their audit fees following the switch. Through examining the real examples of firms’ financial reports, we found consistent evidence that firms turning away from IFRS did take advantage of the disclosure exemptions contained within the New UK GAAP, resulting in reduced disclosure, which may explain the reduced audit fees. Overall, our findings suggest that using full IFRS may still be burdensome for the sampled firms that previously voluntarily adopted the IFRS. The findings also imply that an accounting standard consistent with IFRS but requiring less disclosure, such as the New UK GAAP or the IFRS for Small and Medium-sized Entities, may be welcomed by practitioners and represents a useful alternative for standard setters.","PeriodicalId":506896,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Accounting","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1094406024500033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Synopsis The research problem This paper examined whether firms’ decision to switch from the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) to the new Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in the United Kingdom (New UK GAAP) affects their audit fees. Motivation The New UK GAAP was introduced by the UK regulators to enhance the comparability of financial reports and to reduce the high financial reporting costs associated with IFRS. We aimed to provide evidence on whether the reduced frameworks of IFRS, like the New UK GAAP, are a more cost-effective option. Furthermore, only very few studies analyzed the impact of abandoning IFRS on audit fees, and these found inconsistent results using the public firm data. We aimed to extend the current literature by using the private firm data. The test hypotheses Our first set of hypotheses considered whether the switch from IFRS to the New UK GAAP is associated with audit fees. Our second hypothesis tested whether there is a difference in any such association between larger and smaller firms. Target population We focused on the UK private (i.e., nonlisted) firms that have previously voluntarily adopted the IFRS. Adopted methodology We used regression analyses, difference-in-differences (DID) analyses, various matching methods for robustness, and analyses of firms’ financial reports. Analyses Using the UK private (i.e., nonlisted) firm data for the period 2014–2019, we examined the impact of switching from IFRS to the New UK GAAP on audit fees. The data for regression and DID analyses were obtained from the FAME database. We also downloaded the financial reports of two firms from Companies House to analyze the differences in their reports before and after the switch to the New UK GAAP. Findings We found that firms’ decision to switch from IFRS to the New UK GAAP significantly reduced their audit fees, with larger firms experiencing an additional reduction in their audit fees following the switch. Through examining the real examples of firms’ financial reports, we found consistent evidence that firms turning away from IFRS did take advantage of the disclosure exemptions contained within the New UK GAAP, resulting in reduced disclosure, which may explain the reduced audit fees. Overall, our findings suggest that using full IFRS may still be burdensome for the sampled firms that previously voluntarily adopted the IFRS. The findings also imply that an accounting standard consistent with IFRS but requiring less disclosure, such as the New UK GAAP or the IFRS for Small and Medium-sized Entities, may be welcomed by practitioners and represents a useful alternative for standard setters.
重新考虑《国际财务报告准则》的采用和审计费用:来自英国私营企业的证据
研究问题简介 本文研究了公司从《国际财务报告准则》(IFRS)转向新的《英国公认会计实务》(New UK GAAP)的决定是否会影响其审计费用。新英国公认会计原则由英国监管机构推出,旨在提高财务报告的可比性,降低与《国际财务报告准则》相关的高昂财务报告成本。我们的目的是提供证据,说明《国际财务报告准则》的缩减框架(如《新英国公认会计原则》)是否是一种更具成本效益的选择。此外,只有极少数研究分析了放弃《国际财务报告准则》对审计费用的影响,而且这些研究使用上市公司数据得出的结果并不一致。我们的目标是通过使用私营企业的数据来扩展目前的文献。检验假设 我们的第一组假设考虑了从《国际财务报告准则》转向新的英国公认会计原则是否与审计费用相关。我们的第二个假设检验了规模较大的公司和规模较小的公司之间是否存在这种关联的差异。目标人群 我们的研究重点是之前自愿采用《国际财务报告准则》的英国私营(即非上市)公司。采用的方法 我们使用了回归分析、差异分析(DID)、各种稳健性匹配方法以及公司财务报告分析。分析 利用 2014-2019 年期间的英国私营(即非上市)公司数据,我们考察了从《国际财务报告准则》转向新《英国会计准则》对审计费用的影响。回归分析和DID分析的数据来自FAME数据库。我们还从英国公司注册处下载了两家公司的财务报告,以分析其报告在转换为新英国会计准则前后的差异。研究结果 我们发现,公司决定从《国际财务报告准则》转向新英国公认会计原则后,其审计费用大幅减少,其中规模较大的公司在转向后审计费用的减少幅度更大。通过研究企业财务报告的真实案例,我们发现一致的证据表明,放弃《国际财务报告准则》的企业确实利用了《新英国公认会计原则》中的信息披露豁免,导致信息披露减少,这可能是审计费用减少的原因。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,对于之前自愿采用《国际财务报告准则》的抽样企业来说,使用完整的《国际财务报告准则》可能仍然是一种负担。研究结果还表明,与《国际财务报告准则》一致但对披露要求较低的会计准则,如《新英国公认会计原则》或《中小型企业国际财务报告准则》,可能会受到从业人员的欢迎,对准则制定者来说也是一种有益的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信