Crop response to fertiliser nitrogen on a sodic soil in the Central Region

Sugar Industry Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI:10.36961/si30707
Barry Salter, Eric Kok, Zofia Ostatek-Boczynski
{"title":"Crop response to fertiliser nitrogen on a sodic soil in the Central Region","authors":"Barry Salter, Eric Kok, Zofia Ostatek-Boczynski","doi":"10.36961/si30707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The SIX EASY STEPS™ nutrient-management program encourages a process of ongoing refinement, and any change to a nutrient-management program should be based on evidence. This may include leaf testing, farm records, on-farm evaluation or a combination of these and other factors. Crop response to applied fertiliser should be one of the main factors assessed when refining a nutrient-management program. Crop response to applied nitrogen (N) may be reduced on sodic soils, associated with a reduced crop-N requirement where growth is constrained. However, the sodic conditions may also limit the crop’s ability to acquire N. A trial was established in the Central Region to investigate crop response to fertiliser N on sodic soil. N rate treatments (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg N/ha as urea) were established in the first-ratoon crop and repeated for the remainder of the crop cycle. The trial contained two zones, one with low yield potential and high electrical conductivity (LYHEC) and a second zone with higher yield potential and low electrical conductivity (HYLEC). Both zones were highly sodic (ESP > 15%) at depth. An N deficiency developed over the crop cycle, with the 0N and 50N treatments showing lower leaf %N and reduced cane and sugar yield. Optimum N fertiliser rates increased from the first ratoon (18 kg N/ha) to the third ratoon (109 kg N/ha) but declined in the fourth ratoon (85 kg N/ha). Nitrogen-use efficiency declined with the N application rate, and the highest N uptake efficiency of fertiliser N was 27% at the 50N rate. Overall, the trial showed that a small reduction (~20 kg N/ha or 14%) from the recommended rate of 140 kg N/ha would have been appropriate at this site. The results support the recently developed SIX EASY STEPS Toolbox guidance for refining nutrient inputs for specific on-farm circumstances, including sodic soils. This guidance encourages amelioration of the sodic soil condition as the grower’s priority before the amendment of nutrient inputs is considered.","PeriodicalId":508525,"journal":{"name":"Sugar Industry","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sugar Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36961/si30707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The SIX EASY STEPS™ nutrient-management program encourages a process of ongoing refinement, and any change to a nutrient-management program should be based on evidence. This may include leaf testing, farm records, on-farm evaluation or a combination of these and other factors. Crop response to applied fertiliser should be one of the main factors assessed when refining a nutrient-management program. Crop response to applied nitrogen (N) may be reduced on sodic soils, associated with a reduced crop-N requirement where growth is constrained. However, the sodic conditions may also limit the crop’s ability to acquire N. A trial was established in the Central Region to investigate crop response to fertiliser N on sodic soil. N rate treatments (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg N/ha as urea) were established in the first-ratoon crop and repeated for the remainder of the crop cycle. The trial contained two zones, one with low yield potential and high electrical conductivity (LYHEC) and a second zone with higher yield potential and low electrical conductivity (HYLEC). Both zones were highly sodic (ESP > 15%) at depth. An N deficiency developed over the crop cycle, with the 0N and 50N treatments showing lower leaf %N and reduced cane and sugar yield. Optimum N fertiliser rates increased from the first ratoon (18 kg N/ha) to the third ratoon (109 kg N/ha) but declined in the fourth ratoon (85 kg N/ha). Nitrogen-use efficiency declined with the N application rate, and the highest N uptake efficiency of fertiliser N was 27% at the 50N rate. Overall, the trial showed that a small reduction (~20 kg N/ha or 14%) from the recommended rate of 140 kg N/ha would have been appropriate at this site. The results support the recently developed SIX EASY STEPS Toolbox guidance for refining nutrient inputs for specific on-farm circumstances, including sodic soils. This guidance encourages amelioration of the sodic soil condition as the grower’s priority before the amendment of nutrient inputs is considered.
中部地区钠质土壤上作物对氮肥的反应
SIX EASY STEPS™ 养分管理计划鼓励不断完善,对养分管理计划的任何改变都应基于证据。这可能包括叶片测试、农场记录、农场评估或这些因素与其他因素的结合。在完善养分管理计划时,作物对施肥的反应应作为主要评估因素之一。在含钠土壤上,作物对施用氮肥的反应可能会降低,这与生长受限时作物对氮肥的需求量减少有关。不过,钠盐条件也可能限制作物获取氮的能力。在中部地区进行了一项试验,以调查含钠土壤上作物对氮肥的反应。氮肥施用量处理(0、50、100、150 和 200 千克/公顷尿素)在第一季作物上进行,并在作物周期的剩余时间内重复进行。试验包含两个区,一个是低产潜力和高导电率区(LYHEC),另一个是高产潜力和低导电率区(HYLEC)。这两个区域的深度均为高钠盐化(ESP > 15%)。在作物生长周期中出现缺氮现象,0N 和 50N 处理的叶片氮含量较低,甘蔗和糖的产量减少。最佳氮肥施用量从第一季(18 千克氮/公顷)增加到第三季(109 千克氮/公顷),但在第四季(85 千克氮/公顷)有所下降。氮的利用率随着施氮量的增加而下降,施氮量为 50N 时,肥料氮的吸收率最高,为 27%。总之,试验结果表明,在该地,比推荐的 140 千克氮/公顷的施肥量减少一点(约 20 千克氮/公顷或 14%)是合适的。试验结果支持最近开发的 "六个简单步骤工具箱 "指南,该指南用于针对农场的具体情况(包括钠盐土壤)改进养分投入。该指南鼓励种植者在考虑增加养分投入之前,优先改善土壤盐碱化状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信