Factors affecting prosocial sharing health-related information on social media during a health crisis: A dual exchanging-protecting model

Long Hoang Le, Ai-Phuong Hoang, Cong Hiep Pham
{"title":"Factors affecting prosocial sharing health-related information on social media during a health crisis: A dual exchanging-protecting model","authors":"Long Hoang Le, Ai-Phuong Hoang, Cong Hiep Pham","doi":"10.3127/ajis.v27i0.4349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During a health crisis, prosocial sharing of health-related information (HRI) on social media can help deliver early warnings about new diseases, raise social awareness, exchange support, and spread health policies. Current literature has mainly focused on the factors of general sharing of HRI under normal conditions but neglected those motivations under the health crisis context. This study aims to investigate factors that influence prosocial sharing of HRI on social media during a health crisis. To obtain the objective, this study proposes a dual exchanging-protecting model derived from the fear appeal model and social exchange theory. A partial least squares analysis, carried out on surveyed data of 326 participants, suggested that online users performed two steps of threat appraisal and coping appraisal when they share HRI on social media. Specifically, both health and information risks were found to have impacts on prosocial sharing via motivational factors. Additionally, the motivations of prosocial sharing include both protecting factors (i.e., sharing efficacy, response efficacy) and an exchanging factor (i.e., reciprocity expectation). Our findings offer several theoretical implications and practical contributions for health communicators.","PeriodicalId":106236,"journal":{"name":"Australas. J. Inf. Syst.","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australas. J. Inf. Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v27i0.4349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During a health crisis, prosocial sharing of health-related information (HRI) on social media can help deliver early warnings about new diseases, raise social awareness, exchange support, and spread health policies. Current literature has mainly focused on the factors of general sharing of HRI under normal conditions but neglected those motivations under the health crisis context. This study aims to investigate factors that influence prosocial sharing of HRI on social media during a health crisis. To obtain the objective, this study proposes a dual exchanging-protecting model derived from the fear appeal model and social exchange theory. A partial least squares analysis, carried out on surveyed data of 326 participants, suggested that online users performed two steps of threat appraisal and coping appraisal when they share HRI on social media. Specifically, both health and information risks were found to have impacts on prosocial sharing via motivational factors. Additionally, the motivations of prosocial sharing include both protecting factors (i.e., sharing efficacy, response efficacy) and an exchanging factor (i.e., reciprocity expectation). Our findings offer several theoretical implications and practical contributions for health communicators.
影响健康危机期间在社交媒体上分享健康相关信息的亲社会因素:交流-保护双重模型
在健康危机期间,在社交媒体上进行健康相关信息(HRI)的亲社会分享有助于发布新疾病预警、提高社会意识、交换支持和传播健康政策。目前的文献主要关注正常情况下一般共享健康相关信息的因素,但忽视了健康危机背景下的这些动机。本研究旨在探讨影响健康危机期间在社交媒体上亲社会分享人力资源信息的因素。为实现这一目标,本研究提出了一个源自恐惧吸引力模型和社会交换理论的交换-保护双重模型。通过对 326 名参与者的调查数据进行偏最小二乘法分析,发现网络用户在社交媒体上分享人力资源信息时,会进行威胁评估和应对评估两个步骤。具体而言,研究发现健康风险和信息风险都会通过动机因素对亲社会分享产生影响。此外,亲社会分享的动机还包括保护因素(即分享效能、回应效能)和交换因素(即互惠期望)。我们的研究结果为健康传播者提供了一些理论意义和实践贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信