Organizational learning: Understanding cognitive barriers and what organizations can do about them

Jose Balarezo, Nicolai J Foss, Bo Bernhard Nielsen
{"title":"Organizational learning: Understanding cognitive barriers and what organizations can do about them","authors":"Jose Balarezo, Nicolai J Foss, Bo Bernhard Nielsen","doi":"10.1177/13505076231210635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much progress has been made with respect to improving our understanding of organizational learning. However, important gaps remain with respect to understanding barriers to learning flows that are rooted in bounded rationality and how such barriers can be reduced. We show how manifestations of bounded rationality in the form of framing effects and cognitive biases can act as barriers to learning at the individual, group, and organizational levels. We theorize that organizations can cope with these barriers to learning by deploying managerial practices that function as organizational repairs. More specifically, we add 3Is to the 4I framework by showing how intervening, inducing, and inquiring practices can attenuate these cognitive barriers to organizational learning. The three kinds of organizational repairs differ in terms of how directly they engage with the learning behaviors of organizational members. They range from direct managerial interventions (intervening) to incentivizing or nudging organizational members to engage in learning behaviors (inducing) to building a culture of reflexivity (inquiring). Throughout the paper we critically reflect on the explicit and implicit assumptions in the 4I framework as well as our extension of it.","PeriodicalId":508032,"journal":{"name":"Management Learning","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076231210635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much progress has been made with respect to improving our understanding of organizational learning. However, important gaps remain with respect to understanding barriers to learning flows that are rooted in bounded rationality and how such barriers can be reduced. We show how manifestations of bounded rationality in the form of framing effects and cognitive biases can act as barriers to learning at the individual, group, and organizational levels. We theorize that organizations can cope with these barriers to learning by deploying managerial practices that function as organizational repairs. More specifically, we add 3Is to the 4I framework by showing how intervening, inducing, and inquiring practices can attenuate these cognitive barriers to organizational learning. The three kinds of organizational repairs differ in terms of how directly they engage with the learning behaviors of organizational members. They range from direct managerial interventions (intervening) to incentivizing or nudging organizational members to engage in learning behaviors (inducing) to building a culture of reflexivity (inquiring). Throughout the paper we critically reflect on the explicit and implicit assumptions in the 4I framework as well as our extension of it.
组织学习:了解认知障碍和组织可采取的应对措施
在增进我们对组织学习的了解方面,已经取得了很大进展。然而,在理解根植于有限理性的学习流动障碍以及如何减少这些障碍方面,我们仍然存在重大差距。我们展示了以框架效应和认知偏差为表现形式的约束理性是如何在个人、群体和组织层面阻碍学习的。我们提出的理论是,组织可以通过部署具有组织修复功能的管理实践来应对这些学习障碍。更具体地说,我们在 4I 框架的基础上增加了 3I,说明了干预、诱导和探究实践如何能够减少这些阻碍组织学习的认知障碍。这三种组织修复措施在直接参与组织成员学习行为的方式上有所不同。它们包括直接的管理干预(干预)、激励或鼓励组织成员参与学习行为(诱导)以及建立反思文化(探究)。在整篇文章中,我们对 4I 框架中明确和隐含的假设进行了批判性反思,并对其进行了扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信