Evaluation of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes in concentrating hawthorn fruit and anise seed extract

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Areej Alsobh, G. Vatai, Szilvia Bánvölgyi
{"title":"Evaluation of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes in concentrating hawthorn fruit and anise seed extract","authors":"Areej Alsobh, G. Vatai, Szilvia Bánvölgyi","doi":"10.1556/446.2023.00074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of two reverse osmosis membranes (RO99 and X20) plus one nanofiltration membrane (NF270) at concentrating hawthorn fruit and anise seed extracts. Extracting the anise was done using water at a temperature of 37 °C over a period of 100 min. For hawthorn, ethanol-water (56%) was used as the solvent and extraction occurred at 55 °C for 80 min. The transmembrane pressure (TMP), temperature, and recirculation flow rate of the membrane separation process were monitored and set at 35 bar, 30 °C, and 400 l/h respectively. Using a spectrophotometer, the quantification of valuable compounds was examined. After studying the flow levels, it was discovered that the X20 membrane had the tiniest alterations in permeability, followed by RO99 and NF270. Moreover, in terms of efficiency, the X-20 outperformed RO-99 and NF-270 membranes, where TPC was increased (20 and 18-fold) for anise seed and hawthorn fruit extracts respectively, and TFC was increased 8-fold for both of the extracts. While using NF-270, TPC was increased only (11 and 6-fold), and TFC (4 and 2-fold) for anise seed and hawthorn fruit extracts respectively. For the antioxidant activity, the process using X-20 showed an improvement of around 12-fold for anise extracts and 15-fold for hawthorn extracts for antioxidant activity. In terms of brix, the anise extracts saw a 3-fold increase and the hawthorn extracts saw a 4-fold boost after going through the X-20 membrane concentration process. Additionally, the X-20 membrane exhibits the highest retention rates for both anise and hawthorn extracts and is least affected by fouling during the concentration process.","PeriodicalId":20837,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/446.2023.00074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of two reverse osmosis membranes (RO99 and X20) plus one nanofiltration membrane (NF270) at concentrating hawthorn fruit and anise seed extracts. Extracting the anise was done using water at a temperature of 37 °C over a period of 100 min. For hawthorn, ethanol-water (56%) was used as the solvent and extraction occurred at 55 °C for 80 min. The transmembrane pressure (TMP), temperature, and recirculation flow rate of the membrane separation process were monitored and set at 35 bar, 30 °C, and 400 l/h respectively. Using a spectrophotometer, the quantification of valuable compounds was examined. After studying the flow levels, it was discovered that the X20 membrane had the tiniest alterations in permeability, followed by RO99 and NF270. Moreover, in terms of efficiency, the X-20 outperformed RO-99 and NF-270 membranes, where TPC was increased (20 and 18-fold) for anise seed and hawthorn fruit extracts respectively, and TFC was increased 8-fold for both of the extracts. While using NF-270, TPC was increased only (11 and 6-fold), and TFC (4 and 2-fold) for anise seed and hawthorn fruit extracts respectively. For the antioxidant activity, the process using X-20 showed an improvement of around 12-fold for anise extracts and 15-fold for hawthorn extracts for antioxidant activity. In terms of brix, the anise extracts saw a 3-fold increase and the hawthorn extracts saw a 4-fold boost after going through the X-20 membrane concentration process. Additionally, the X-20 membrane exhibits the highest retention rates for both anise and hawthorn extracts and is least affected by fouling during the concentration process.
评估反渗透膜和纳滤膜在浓缩山楂果和八角籽提取物中的应用
本研究旨在评估两种反渗透膜(RO99 和 X20)和一种纳滤膜(NF270)浓缩山楂果和八角种子提取物的效果。八角的萃取是用水在 37 °C 的温度下进行的,时间为 100 分钟。山楂则使用乙醇-水(56%)作为溶剂,在 55 °C 下萃取 80 分钟。膜分离过程的跨膜压力(TMP)、温度和再循环流速受到监控,并分别设定为 35 巴、30 ℃ 和 400 升/小时。使用分光光度计检测了有价值化合物的定量。研究流量水平后发现,X20 膜的渗透性变化最小,其次是 RO99 和 NF270。此外,就效率而言,X-20 膜优于 RO-99 和 NF-270 膜,八角籽和山楂果提取物的 TPC 分别提高了 20 倍和 18 倍,两种提取物的 TFC 提高了 8 倍。而使用 NF-270 时,八角茴香籽和山楂果提取物的 TPC 只分别提高了 11 倍和 6 倍,TFC 提高了 4 倍和 2 倍。在抗氧化活性方面,使用 X-20 的工艺使八角提取物的抗氧化活性提高了约 12 倍,使山楂提取物的抗氧化活性提高了 15 倍。在白利糖度方面,八角提取物经过 X-20 膜浓缩工艺后提高了 3 倍,山楂提取物提高了 4 倍。此外,X-20 膜对八角和山楂提取物的保留率最高,在浓缩过程中受污垢的影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences
Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original papers, review papers and preliminary communications in the field of agricultural, environmental and process engineering. The main purpose is to show new scientific results, new developments and procedures with special respect to the engineering of crop production and animal husbandry, soil and water management, precision agriculture, information technology in agriculture, advancements in instrumentation and automation, technical and safety aspects of environmental and food engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信