Comparison between two different doses of Norepinephrine infusion for preventing post spinal Anesthesia Hypotension during Cesarean section

R. Bhattarai, Amarendra Kumar Yadav, Parasmani Shah, Prabin Sharma
{"title":"Comparison between two different doses of Norepinephrine infusion for preventing post spinal Anesthesia Hypotension during Cesarean section","authors":"R. Bhattarai, Amarendra Kumar Yadav, Parasmani Shah, Prabin Sharma","doi":"10.3126/bjhs.v8i2.59851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:  Post spinal maternal hypotension is common complication during cesarean section. Norepinephrine is a vasopressor recently used in obstetrics anesthesia. However, there are less data available regarding its optimal dose. Objective: The main objective of this study is to compare two doses of infusion of norepinephrine for post spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. Methodology: A prospective, randomized, double blinded study on full term pregnant patient scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. The infusion of Norepinephrine started after spinal anesthesia after patient randomly divided into two groups. Group A received norepinephrine infusion rate of 0.025ug/kg/min and Group B received at rate of 0.050ug/kg/min. The norepinephrine was continued till 5 minutes after the delivery of fetus and subsequently stopped. These two groups were compared with systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, intraoperative hypotensive episodes, Nausea and Vomiting, tachycardia and neonatal outcomes. Results:  Systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure was higher in group B when compared with group A at all time intervals intraoperatively. The minimum systolic blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure in group A were 91.61±8.76 and 59.8±5.29 and group B were 90.67±1.21 and 65±3.46 respectively. No significant difference in heart rate between the two groups. In 0.025ug/kg/min group had 23 (46%) hypotensive episode whereas in 0.050ug/kg/min group had 6 (12%) hypotensive episodes (p<0.001). In group A 9 patient had nausea and vomiting. Bradycardia was seen in 2 % of patient in group A. Tachycardia was seen in 4% of patients in group B. Apgar score was comparable and significant (P<0.05) in 10 minutes. Conclusion: In the present study, the infusion of  0.050ug/kg/min norepinephrine reduced the hypotensive episodes when compared with the infusion of 0.025ug/kg/min norepinephrine following spinal Anesthesia during cesarean delivery.","PeriodicalId":31640,"journal":{"name":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"231 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birat Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/bjhs.v8i2.59851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:  Post spinal maternal hypotension is common complication during cesarean section. Norepinephrine is a vasopressor recently used in obstetrics anesthesia. However, there are less data available regarding its optimal dose. Objective: The main objective of this study is to compare two doses of infusion of norepinephrine for post spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. Methodology: A prospective, randomized, double blinded study on full term pregnant patient scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. The infusion of Norepinephrine started after spinal anesthesia after patient randomly divided into two groups. Group A received norepinephrine infusion rate of 0.025ug/kg/min and Group B received at rate of 0.050ug/kg/min. The norepinephrine was continued till 5 minutes after the delivery of fetus and subsequently stopped. These two groups were compared with systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, intraoperative hypotensive episodes, Nausea and Vomiting, tachycardia and neonatal outcomes. Results:  Systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure was higher in group B when compared with group A at all time intervals intraoperatively. The minimum systolic blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure in group A were 91.61±8.76 and 59.8±5.29 and group B were 90.67±1.21 and 65±3.46 respectively. No significant difference in heart rate between the two groups. In 0.025ug/kg/min group had 23 (46%) hypotensive episode whereas in 0.050ug/kg/min group had 6 (12%) hypotensive episodes (p<0.001). In group A 9 patient had nausea and vomiting. Bradycardia was seen in 2 % of patient in group A. Tachycardia was seen in 4% of patients in group B. Apgar score was comparable and significant (P<0.05) in 10 minutes. Conclusion: In the present study, the infusion of  0.050ug/kg/min norepinephrine reduced the hypotensive episodes when compared with the infusion of 0.025ug/kg/min norepinephrine following spinal Anesthesia during cesarean delivery.
比较两种不同剂量的去甲肾上腺素输注对预防剖宫产术中脊髓麻醉后低血压的作用
导言 脊柱术后产妇低血压是剖宫产术中常见的并发症。去甲肾上腺素是最近用于产科麻醉的一种血管抑制剂。然而,有关其最佳剂量的数据较少。 研究目的本研究的主要目的是比较两种剂量的去甲肾上腺素输注对剖宫产术后脊柱低血压的治疗效果。 研究方法:前瞻性、随机、双盲研究,对象为计划择期剖宫产的足月孕妇。患者随机分为两组,在脊髓麻醉后开始输注去甲肾上腺素。A 组的去甲肾上腺素输注率为 0.025ug/kg/min,B 组的去甲肾上腺素输注率为 0.050ug/kg/min。去甲肾上腺素持续到胎儿娩出后 5 分钟,随后停止输注。对两组的收缩压、平均动脉压、心率、术中低血压发作、恶心呕吐、心动过速和新生儿预后进行了比较。 结果 在术中的所有时间间隔内,B 组的收缩压和平均动脉压均高于 A 组。A 组的最低收缩压和平均动脉压分别为(91.61±8.76)和(59.8±5.29),B 组分别为(90.67±1.21)和(65±3.46)。两组心率无明显差异。0.025ug/kg/min 组有 23 次(46%)低血压发作,而 0.050ug/kg/min 组有 6 次(12%)低血压发作(P<0.001)。A 组有 9 名患者出现恶心和呕吐。A 组中有 2% 的患者出现心动过缓,B 组中有 4% 的患者出现心动过速。10 分钟后,Apgar 评分具有可比性和显著性(P<0.05)。 结论在本研究中,剖宫产脊髓麻醉后输注 0.050ug/kg/min去甲肾上腺素与输注 0.025ug/kg/min 去甲肾上腺素相比,可减少低血压发作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信