Robust compromise multicriteria decision model to evaluate the level of achievement of graduation profile

Fernando Rojas Zúñiga, Pamela Estay Castillo, Kathleen Priken Figueroa, Ximena Ceballos Sánchez, Héctor Vargas Oyarzún, Joaquín Rojas Rodríguez, Juan Carlos Molina Carvajal
{"title":"Robust compromise multicriteria decision model to evaluate the level of achievement of graduation profile","authors":"Fernando Rojas Zúñiga, Pamela Estay Castillo, Kathleen Priken Figueroa, Ximena Ceballos Sánchez, Héctor Vargas Oyarzún, Joaquín Rojas Rodríguez, Juan Carlos Molina Carvajal","doi":"10.54022/shsv4n4-026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose an approach of a robust compromise multi-criteria decision-making model that evaluates the level of competency achievement in graduation profiles. Quantitative information on qualifications of specific and generic competencies of a graduation profile was collected from professors, graduates, employers, community partners, and students' self-perception of achievement. This information was categorized using ordinal Likert scales generated through Monte Carlo simulation methods and copula modeling. The proposed model is validated using optimization methods. It provides a single score for the level of competency achievement, and the analysis is conducted using descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of clusters. Simulated scenarios revealed that higher weights given by stakeholders in the construction of the robust compromise score were associated with higher evaluation scores of competencies from the same stakeholders. Scenarios with negative correlations between stakeholder qualifications about level of achievement of graduation profile yielded lower scores in the robust compromise multi-criteria decision-making model. Our proposal for Robust Compromise Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model offers more precise single scores, reducing the epistemological uncertainty associated with the input information.","PeriodicalId":507471,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN HEALTH SCIENCES","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN HEALTH SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54022/shsv4n4-026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose an approach of a robust compromise multi-criteria decision-making model that evaluates the level of competency achievement in graduation profiles. Quantitative information on qualifications of specific and generic competencies of a graduation profile was collected from professors, graduates, employers, community partners, and students' self-perception of achievement. This information was categorized using ordinal Likert scales generated through Monte Carlo simulation methods and copula modeling. The proposed model is validated using optimization methods. It provides a single score for the level of competency achievement, and the analysis is conducted using descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of clusters. Simulated scenarios revealed that higher weights given by stakeholders in the construction of the robust compromise score were associated with higher evaluation scores of competencies from the same stakeholders. Scenarios with negative correlations between stakeholder qualifications about level of achievement of graduation profile yielded lower scores in the robust compromise multi-criteria decision-making model. Our proposal for Robust Compromise Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model offers more precise single scores, reducing the epistemological uncertainty associated with the input information.
评估毕业情况成就水平的稳健折中多标准决策模型
我们提出了一种稳健折中的多标准决策模型方法,用于评估毕业简介中的能力成就水平。我们从教授、毕业生、雇主、社区合作伙伴以及学生的自我感觉中收集了有关毕业简介中特定和通用能力资格的定量信息。这些信息通过蒙特卡罗模拟法和共轭模型生成的序数李克特量表进行分类。提议的模型通过优化方法进行了验证。它为能力成就水平提供了一个单一的分数,并使用描述性统计和多元聚类分析进行了分析。模拟情景显示,利益相关者在构建稳健折衷分数时给予的权重越高,则同一利益相关者的能力评价分数越高。在稳健折中多标准决策模型中,利益相关者对毕业概况成就水平的评价之间存在负相关的情况下,得分较低。我们提出的稳健折中多标准决策模型提供了更精确的单一分数,减少了与输入信息相关的认识论不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信