{"title":"ARCHIMEDES AT SYRACUSE: TWO NEW WITNESSES TO CASSIUS DIO'S ROMAN HISTORY 15 (TZETZES’ CARMINA ILIACA AND HYPOMNEMA IN S. LVCIAM)","authors":"Philip Rance","doi":"10.1017/S0009838823000496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Cassius Dio's fragmentary Roman History 15 contains an account of Archimedes’ role in defending Syracuse during the Roman siege of 213–212 b.c., incorporating a legendary tale about a solar reflector Archimedes constructed to burn Roman warships, and including details of his death when the city fell. The textual basis of this famous episode depends on two derivative twelfth-century works: Zonaras’ Epitome of Histories (9.4–5) and Tzetzes’ Chiliades (2.35). After clarifying the present state of enquiry, this paper introduces two new witnesses, overlooked by editors of Dio and extensive scholarship on Archimedes, and assesses their value for reconstructing Dio's text. Comparative analysis of corresponding Dio-derived material in Tzetzes’ Carmina Iliaca and Hypomnema in S. Luciam, especially verbal correspondences with Zonaras’ Epitome, demonstrates that they are independent and, sometimes, superior witnesses to Dio's wording and content, reflecting Tzetzes’ selective use of the Roman History in different verse and prose compositions over several decades. The study considers editorial implications for this section of Dio's work and general characteristics of Tzetzes’ writings as repositories of testimonia and fragments.","PeriodicalId":22560,"journal":{"name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Classical Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838823000496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Cassius Dio's fragmentary Roman History 15 contains an account of Archimedes’ role in defending Syracuse during the Roman siege of 213–212 b.c., incorporating a legendary tale about a solar reflector Archimedes constructed to burn Roman warships, and including details of his death when the city fell. The textual basis of this famous episode depends on two derivative twelfth-century works: Zonaras’ Epitome of Histories (9.4–5) and Tzetzes’ Chiliades (2.35). After clarifying the present state of enquiry, this paper introduces two new witnesses, overlooked by editors of Dio and extensive scholarship on Archimedes, and assesses their value for reconstructing Dio's text. Comparative analysis of corresponding Dio-derived material in Tzetzes’ Carmina Iliaca and Hypomnema in S. Luciam, especially verbal correspondences with Zonaras’ Epitome, demonstrates that they are independent and, sometimes, superior witnesses to Dio's wording and content, reflecting Tzetzes’ selective use of the Roman History in different verse and prose compositions over several decades. The study considers editorial implications for this section of Dio's work and general characteristics of Tzetzes’ writings as repositories of testimonia and fragments.
阿基米德在锡拉库扎:卡西乌斯-迪奥的《罗马史》的两个新见证 15 (Tzetzes' carmina iliaca 和 hypomnema in s. lvciam)
摘要 卡西乌斯-迪奥(Cassius Dio)残缺不全的《罗马史》第15卷记载了阿基米德在公元前213-212年罗马围攻锡拉库扎期间的保卫战中的作用,其中包含了一个关于阿基米德为烧毁罗马战舰而建造的太阳反射器的传奇故事,还包括了他在锡拉库扎陷落时死亡的细节。这一著名情节的文本基础取决于两部十二世纪的衍生作品:佐纳拉斯(Zonaras)的《历史书目》(9.4-5)和策策斯(Tzetzes)的《奇利亚德》(2.35)。在澄清了目前的研究现状后,本文介绍了两个被《迪奥》的编辑和有关阿基米德的大量学术研究所忽视的新的见证人,并评估了它们对重建《迪奥》文本的价值。通过比较分析策泽斯的 Carmina Iliaca 和 Hypomnema in S. Luciam 中相应的迪奥衍生材料,尤其是与 Zonaras 的 Epitome 的语言对应关系,证明它们是迪奥措辞和内容的独立见证,有时甚至是更好的见证,反映了策泽斯几十年来在不同的诗歌和散文创作中对罗马史的选择性使用。本研究考虑了编辑对迪奥这部分作品的影响,以及茨泽斯的著作作为见证和片段库的一般特点。