Corn seeds of different sizes under drying methods and storage periods

M. Nicoletti, T. A. Ortiz, Matheus Nicoletti, Nathália Nicoletti, L. Takahashi
{"title":"Corn seeds of different sizes under drying methods and storage periods","authors":"M. Nicoletti, T. A. Ortiz, Matheus Nicoletti, Nathália Nicoletti, L. Takahashi","doi":"10.55905/rdelosv16.n49-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The seed is the main input in the production process of the corn crop, and the drying process is crucial for maintaining the physiological quality and longevity of the seeds. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the physiological potential of hybrid corn seeds retained in different sieves under drying methods and storage periods. The experiment was conducted with corn seeds of the hybrid Balu 280 PRO, in a completely randomized design, with eight replications of 50 seeds, in a 5 × 2 × 2 factorial scheme, with retention sieves (24 M, 22 M, 20 M, 18 M, and 20 R), drying methods (traditional drying and gas drying) and storage periods (0 and 365 days). The variables analyzed were viability and vigor, based on germination and cold tests, respectively. Data were submitted for variance analysis using the F test (p<0.05) and means were compared using the Tukey test (p<0.05). For non-stored seeds, traditional and gas drying methods are independent for maintaining the viability and vigor of corn seeds. For seeds under 1 year of storage, the traditional drying method is better than gas drying to maintain the physiological quality of corn seeds, but the commercial standard is maintained in both methods. In both traditional and gas drying methods, seed storage favors the reduction of germination and vigor of corn seeds. Seeds retained on 22 M, 20 M, and 20 R sieves have greater vigor when compared to seeds retained on 18 M sieves.","PeriodicalId":345661,"journal":{"name":"DELOS: DESARROLLO LOCAL SOSTENIBLE","volume":"343 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DELOS: DESARROLLO LOCAL SOSTENIBLE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55905/rdelosv16.n49-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The seed is the main input in the production process of the corn crop, and the drying process is crucial for maintaining the physiological quality and longevity of the seeds. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the physiological potential of hybrid corn seeds retained in different sieves under drying methods and storage periods. The experiment was conducted with corn seeds of the hybrid Balu 280 PRO, in a completely randomized design, with eight replications of 50 seeds, in a 5 × 2 × 2 factorial scheme, with retention sieves (24 M, 22 M, 20 M, 18 M, and 20 R), drying methods (traditional drying and gas drying) and storage periods (0 and 365 days). The variables analyzed were viability and vigor, based on germination and cold tests, respectively. Data were submitted for variance analysis using the F test (p<0.05) and means were compared using the Tukey test (p<0.05). For non-stored seeds, traditional and gas drying methods are independent for maintaining the viability and vigor of corn seeds. For seeds under 1 year of storage, the traditional drying method is better than gas drying to maintain the physiological quality of corn seeds, but the commercial standard is maintained in both methods. In both traditional and gas drying methods, seed storage favors the reduction of germination and vigor of corn seeds. Seeds retained on 22 M, 20 M, and 20 R sieves have greater vigor when compared to seeds retained on 18 M sieves.
不同大小的玉米种子在干燥方法和储存时间下的表现
种子是玉米作物生产过程中的主要投入品,而干燥过程对保持种子的生理质量和寿命至关重要。因此,本研究旨在评估杂交玉米种子在不同干燥方法和储藏期下保留在不同筛子中的生理潜力。实验以杂交种 Balu 280 PRO 的玉米种子为研究对象,采用完全随机设计,以 5 × 2 × 2 的析因方案进行 8 次重复,每次 50 粒种子,采用保留筛(24 M、22 M、20 M、18 M 和 20 R)、干燥方法(传统干燥和气体干燥)和储藏期(0 天和 365 天)。分析的变量分别是根据发芽试验和低温试验得出的生存力和活力。数据采用 F 检验(P<0.05)进行方差分析,采用 Tukey 检验(P<0.05)比较平均值。对于非贮藏种子,传统干燥法和气体干燥法在保持玉米种子的存活率和活力方面是独立的。对于储藏 1 年以下的种子,传统干燥法比气体干燥法更能保持玉米种子的生理品质,但两种方法都能保持商业标准。无论是传统干燥法还是气体干燥法,种子贮藏都有利于降低玉米种子的发芽率和活力。与保留在 18 M 筛上的种子相比,保留在 22 M、20 M 和 20 R 筛上的种子具有更强的活力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信