Collaborative pathways

Laura Mann
{"title":"Collaborative pathways","authors":"Laura Mann","doi":"10.14742/apubs.2023.632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This extended abstract delineates a collaborative endeavor between the School of Communication & Design and the Learning Design team at RMIT Vietnam. The project’s core objective was to uplift and reimagine blended learning approaches across selected courses. In line with the growing body of research endorsing the role of academic-designer partnerships in fostering technology-enhanced learning (Ellis et al., 2016; Nihuka & Voogt, 2012; Huber & Jacka, 2022; McDonald & Mayes, 2005), this initiative thrived on the close collaboration between academics and learning designers. What sets our approach apart is the non-homogenized implementation of blended learning changes. Instead of uniformly transitioning courses from face-to-face to a blended format, changes were specifically tailored based on the needs and learning outcomes of each course. This bespoke approach, combined with our multifaceted support framework and adaptive project management strategies, ensured that the course design was both effective and reflective of individual course characteristics.   The multifaceted support framework leveraged initial design workshops to establish core principles and a shared vision, codesign of initial proof of concept course modules, design templates, a central site providing blended learning exemplars and pedagogical resources and ongoing consultations. Embedded throughout these were foundational frameworks for online and blended learning including Backward Design and Community of Inquiry (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005, Garrison et al., 2001). New tools to support active, social, asynchronous learning were also integrated into the LMS. Adaptive project management strategies addressed challenges as they arose.  The transformed courses showcase innovative blended learning approaches personalized to disciplinary contexts, leading to positive measurable impacts. Academics reported feeling empowered by new skills gained through the collaboration and this positive reception extended the reach of the program, providing a catalyst for academics not directly involved to implement the approaches and tools used in the program in their own course design.   Despite its success, the initiative was not devoid of challenges.  Different priorities necessitated compromise, and academics required additional support to adapt to new the new technologies and pedagogical strategies. The project’s collaborative nature proved instrumental in surmounting these hurdles, enabling learning designers to progressively build academic involvement whilst addressing issues central to blended learning implementation in a Vietnamese context such as lack of familiarity and experience with blended learning (Le et al., 2021).  The outcomes of this collaboration underscore the value of leveraging complementary expertise of academics and designers. Beyond elevating technology-enhanced learning, the project fostered mutual understanding, leading to wider impacts than initially anticipated. Insights gained can inform effective collaboration strategies and highlight organizational enablers to nurture such relationships and promote the move to blended learning and uplifting of courses on a larger scale.     This tailored approach not only represents a best practice example in the TEL context but also signifies a progressive step in the broader landscape of higher education, which is rapidly evolving towards online and blended modalities. While our experience is grounded in the Vietnamese context, the inherent flexibility and adaptability of our methods make it a model that can be replicated and customised for diverse tertiary educational settings globally.   As higher education continues its evolutionary trajectory, academic-designer collaborations such as this one, rooted in blended learning enhancement, will grow in significance. The insights and methods presented here offer valuable pointers for those aiming to advance pedagogical innovation.","PeriodicalId":236417,"journal":{"name":"ASCILITE Publications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASCILITE Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This extended abstract delineates a collaborative endeavor between the School of Communication & Design and the Learning Design team at RMIT Vietnam. The project’s core objective was to uplift and reimagine blended learning approaches across selected courses. In line with the growing body of research endorsing the role of academic-designer partnerships in fostering technology-enhanced learning (Ellis et al., 2016; Nihuka & Voogt, 2012; Huber & Jacka, 2022; McDonald & Mayes, 2005), this initiative thrived on the close collaboration between academics and learning designers. What sets our approach apart is the non-homogenized implementation of blended learning changes. Instead of uniformly transitioning courses from face-to-face to a blended format, changes were specifically tailored based on the needs and learning outcomes of each course. This bespoke approach, combined with our multifaceted support framework and adaptive project management strategies, ensured that the course design was both effective and reflective of individual course characteristics.   The multifaceted support framework leveraged initial design workshops to establish core principles and a shared vision, codesign of initial proof of concept course modules, design templates, a central site providing blended learning exemplars and pedagogical resources and ongoing consultations. Embedded throughout these were foundational frameworks for online and blended learning including Backward Design and Community of Inquiry (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005, Garrison et al., 2001). New tools to support active, social, asynchronous learning were also integrated into the LMS. Adaptive project management strategies addressed challenges as they arose.  The transformed courses showcase innovative blended learning approaches personalized to disciplinary contexts, leading to positive measurable impacts. Academics reported feeling empowered by new skills gained through the collaboration and this positive reception extended the reach of the program, providing a catalyst for academics not directly involved to implement the approaches and tools used in the program in their own course design.   Despite its success, the initiative was not devoid of challenges.  Different priorities necessitated compromise, and academics required additional support to adapt to new the new technologies and pedagogical strategies. The project’s collaborative nature proved instrumental in surmounting these hurdles, enabling learning designers to progressively build academic involvement whilst addressing issues central to blended learning implementation in a Vietnamese context such as lack of familiarity and experience with blended learning (Le et al., 2021).  The outcomes of this collaboration underscore the value of leveraging complementary expertise of academics and designers. Beyond elevating technology-enhanced learning, the project fostered mutual understanding, leading to wider impacts than initially anticipated. Insights gained can inform effective collaboration strategies and highlight organizational enablers to nurture such relationships and promote the move to blended learning and uplifting of courses on a larger scale.     This tailored approach not only represents a best practice example in the TEL context but also signifies a progressive step in the broader landscape of higher education, which is rapidly evolving towards online and blended modalities. While our experience is grounded in the Vietnamese context, the inherent flexibility and adaptability of our methods make it a model that can be replicated and customised for diverse tertiary educational settings globally.   As higher education continues its evolutionary trajectory, academic-designer collaborations such as this one, rooted in blended learning enhancement, will grow in significance. The insights and methods presented here offer valuable pointers for those aiming to advance pedagogical innovation.
合作途径
本扩展摘要描述了传播与设计学院与皇家墨尔本理工大学越南分校学习设计团队之间的合作项目。该项目的核心目标是提升和重新构想选定课程的混合式学习方法。 越来越多的研究认可学术界与设计师的合作在促进技术强化学习中的作用(Ellis 等人,2016 年;Nihuka & Voogt,2012 年;Huber & Jacka,2022 年;McDonald & Mayes,2005 年),与此相一致的是,这一举措也得益于学术界与学习设计师之间的密切合作。 我们的方法与众不同之处在于非同质化地实施混合式学习变革。我们不是千篇一律地将课程从面授形式过渡到混合形式,而是根据每门课程的需求和学习成果,有针对性地进行改革。这种定制方法与我们的多方面支持框架和适应性项目管理战略相结合,确保了课程设计既有效又能反映出每门课程的特点。 多方面支持框架利用初步设计研讨会确立核心原则和共同愿景、初步概念验证课程模块的编码设计、设计模板、提供混合式学习范例和教学资源的中心网站以及持续咨询。这些都包含了在线和混合式学习的基础框架,包括后向设计和探究社区(Wiggins & McTighe, 2005, Garrison et al.)支持主动、社交、异步学习的新工具也被整合到了 LMS 中。适应性项目管理战略解决了出现的挑战。 改造后的课程展示了针对学科背景的个性化创新混合式学习方法,产生了可衡量的积极影响。学术界报告说,通过合作获得的新技能让他们感觉到了力量,这种积极的反应扩大了计划的影响范围,为没有直接参与计划的学术界在自己的课程设计中实施计划中使用的方法和工具提供了催化剂。 尽管计划取得了成功,但也并非没有挑战。 不同的优先事项需要妥协,学者们需要额外的支持来适应新技术和教学策略。事实证明,该项目的合作性质有助于克服这些障碍,使学习设计者能够逐步建立学术参与,同时解决在越南背景下实施混合式学习的核心问题,如缺乏对混合式学习的熟悉和经验(Le 等人,2021 年)。 这次合作的成果凸显了利用学术界和设计者互补专长的价值。除了提升技术强化学习之外,该项目还促进了相互理解,产生了比最初预期更广泛的影响。所获得的启示可以为有效的合作战略提供参考,并突出强调培养这种关系的组织推动因素,促进更大规模的混合式学习和课程提升。 这种量身定做的方法不仅是电子学习领域的最佳实践范例,也标志着高等教育在向在线和混合模式快速发展的大环境中迈出了进步的一步。虽然我们的经验立足于越南的国情,但我们方法固有的灵活性和适应性使其成为一种可在全球各种高等教育环境中复制和定制的模式。 随着高等教育的不断发展,像这样植根于混合式学习的学术与设计合作将越来越重要。本文提出的见解和方法为那些旨在推进教学创新的人提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信