Between anger and love: A multi-level study on the impact of policy issues on user reactions in national election campaigns on Facebook in Germany, Hungary, and Norway

Hedvig Tønnesen, M. Bene, J. Haßler, Anders Olof Larsson, M. Magin, Eli Skogerbø, A. Wurst
{"title":"Between anger and love: A multi-level study on the impact of policy issues on user reactions in national election campaigns on Facebook in Germany, Hungary, and Norway","authors":"Hedvig Tønnesen, M. Bene, J. Haßler, Anders Olof Larsson, M. Magin, Eli Skogerbø, A. Wurst","doi":"10.1177/14614448231208122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eliciting user reactions is an important tactic for political actors using social media like Facebook to seek attention for campaign messages on policy issues. Still, little is known about policy issues’ effect on user reactions and how structural factors play into this relationship. Applying a standardized manual content analysis on Facebook posts from political parties and their top candidates during the German, Hungarian, and Norwegian national election campaigns in 2021/2022 ( N = 4988), we investigate the relationship between policy issues and two of Facebook’s “emotional reactions” (“angry” and “love”). We find that posts addressing the economy, energy policy, and foreign policy drive more “angry” reactions, while environmental posts drive more “love” reactions. While effects are largely uniform across different party types, there are more variations between countries. Our analyses suggest that differences between individual parties and candidates and situational factors are vital to understanding the relationship between policy issues and user reactions.","PeriodicalId":443328,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231208122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eliciting user reactions is an important tactic for political actors using social media like Facebook to seek attention for campaign messages on policy issues. Still, little is known about policy issues’ effect on user reactions and how structural factors play into this relationship. Applying a standardized manual content analysis on Facebook posts from political parties and their top candidates during the German, Hungarian, and Norwegian national election campaigns in 2021/2022 ( N = 4988), we investigate the relationship between policy issues and two of Facebook’s “emotional reactions” (“angry” and “love”). We find that posts addressing the economy, energy policy, and foreign policy drive more “angry” reactions, while environmental posts drive more “love” reactions. While effects are largely uniform across different party types, there are more variations between countries. Our analyses suggest that differences between individual parties and candidates and situational factors are vital to understanding the relationship between policy issues and user reactions.
愤怒与爱之间:关于政策问题对德国、匈牙利和挪威 Facebook 上全国竞选活动中用户反应的影响的多层次研究
对于使用 Facebook 等社交媒体为政策问题竞选信息寻求关注的政治行为者来说,引起用户反应是一种重要策略。然而,人们对政策问题对用户反应的影响以及结构性因素如何影响这种关系仍然知之甚少。通过对 2021/2022 年德国、匈牙利和挪威全国大选期间各政党及其主要候选人在 Facebook 上发布的帖子(N = 4988)进行标准化人工内容分析,我们研究了政策问题与 Facebook 的两种 "情绪反应"("愤怒 "和 "喜爱")之间的关系。我们发现,涉及经济、能源政策和外交政策的帖子会引起更多的 "愤怒 "反应,而涉及环保的帖子会引起更多的 "喜爱 "反应。虽然不同政党类型之间的效果基本一致,但国家之间的差异更大。我们的分析表明,政党和候选人个体之间的差异以及情境因素对于理解政策问题与用户反应之间的关系至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信