Kewenangan Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan dalam Melakukan Diversi Pra Ajudikasi (Studi pada Balai Pemasyarakatan Kelas II Ambon)

Angelina Imanuela Debby Nusaly, D. Pattipawae, Carolina Tuhumury
{"title":"Kewenangan Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan dalam Melakukan Diversi Pra Ajudikasi (Studi pada Balai Pemasyarakatan Kelas II Ambon)","authors":"Angelina Imanuela Debby Nusaly, D. Pattipawae, Carolina Tuhumury","doi":"10.47268/capitan.v1i2.11192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The criminalization of children who commit criminal offenses requires a community research report from the Correctional Center, which in this case is made by the Community Supervisor as regulated in the provisions of article 1 number 13 of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning SPPA. One of the cases handled by the Community Supervisor is a case of persecution, based on police report Number B/113VII/1019/Reskrim. The client underwent an examination process at the Ambon Island and Lease Islands police station for allegedly committing the crime of persecution as referred to in Article 170 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code (KUHP). The purpose of this research is to ask for consideration or advice from the Community Supervisor after the criminal offense is reported and the Community Supervisor is also not involved in the diversion process at the investigation stage. This Research uses normative legal research methods and will be studied based on positive legal provisions, as well as legal principles. and using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This research uses normative legal research methods and will be studied based on positive legal provisions, as well as legal principles. and using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials.The result and discussion shows that the authority to determine Diversion is given to law enforcement officials handling children's cases,Community Research from the Investigator as stipulated in Article 28 of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning SPPA. After the Community Supervisor conducts the research, the results of the community research will be given to the Investigator. If the Investigators do not ask for consideration or advice from the Community Supervisor in the attempted diversion process, it can be said that the diversion process at the investigation stage is null and void.","PeriodicalId":505524,"journal":{"name":"CAPITAN: Constitutional Law & Administrative Law Review","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAPITAN: Constitutional Law & Administrative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47268/capitan.v1i2.11192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The criminalization of children who commit criminal offenses requires a community research report from the Correctional Center, which in this case is made by the Community Supervisor as regulated in the provisions of article 1 number 13 of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning SPPA. One of the cases handled by the Community Supervisor is a case of persecution, based on police report Number B/113VII/1019/Reskrim. The client underwent an examination process at the Ambon Island and Lease Islands police station for allegedly committing the crime of persecution as referred to in Article 170 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code (KUHP). The purpose of this research is to ask for consideration or advice from the Community Supervisor after the criminal offense is reported and the Community Supervisor is also not involved in the diversion process at the investigation stage. This Research uses normative legal research methods and will be studied based on positive legal provisions, as well as legal principles. and using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This research uses normative legal research methods and will be studied based on positive legal provisions, as well as legal principles. and using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials.The result and discussion shows that the authority to determine Diversion is given to law enforcement officials handling children's cases,Community Research from the Investigator as stipulated in Article 28 of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning SPPA. After the Community Supervisor conducts the research, the results of the community research will be given to the Investigator. If the Investigators do not ask for consideration or advice from the Community Supervisor in the attempted diversion process, it can be said that the diversion process at the investigation stage is null and void.
社区监督员在开展裁定前分流工作中的权力(在安汶岛二级惩教中心开展的研究)
对犯有刑事罪的儿童进行刑事定罪需要惩教中心的社区研究报告,在这种情况下,根据2012年第11号法律《防止虐待儿童法》第1条第13款的规定,该报告由社区监督员撰写。社区监督员处理的案件之一是一起迫害案件,依据的是编号为 B/113VII/1019/Reskrim 的警方报告。当事人因涉嫌触犯《刑法典》(KUHP)第 170 条第(1)款所述的迫害罪,在安汶岛和租赁岛警察局接受了审查。本研究的目的是在刑事犯罪报案后请求社区监督员给予考虑或建议,社区监督员也不参与调查阶段的分流程序。本研究采用规范性法律研究方法,将根据实在法条款以及法律原则进行研究,并使用第一、第二和第三手法律资料。本研究采用规范性法律研究方法,将以积极的法律规定和法律原则为基础,并使用第一、第二和第三级法律材料进行研究。结果和讨论表明,根据 2012 年第 11 号法律第 28 条关于 SPPA 的规定,决定转送的权力赋予了处理儿童案件的执法人员,即来自调查员的社区研究。社区监督员开展调查后,将向调查员提供社区调查的结果。如果调查员在试图分流的过程中没有征求社区监督员的意见或建议,可以说调查阶段的分流过程是无效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信