Investigating Teachers’ Opinions On the Competences In Curriculum

Seyit Bilal Güneş, Faysal Özdaş
{"title":"Investigating Teachers’ Opinions On the Competences In Curriculum","authors":"Seyit Bilal Güneş, Faysal Özdaş","doi":"10.37669/milliegitim.1283252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to investigate the opinions of secondary school teachers about the acquisition of eight key competences in the curriculum. In accordance with this aim, it was analyzed whether there was a significant difference between the opinions of teachers in terms of gender, seniority, educational level and subject variables. The descriptive survey method, one of the quantitative research designs, was used in the research. The sample, consisted of 444 secondary school teachers lectured at the official secondary schools in the 2021-2022 academic year, was selected by convenient sampling method. The five-point Likert-type scale based on competences developed by the researchers was used as the data collection tool. The data obtained were analyzed with descriptive statistics, t-test, One-Way ANOVA and Post Hoc tests by SPSS 21.0 package program. Findings showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the teachers' opinions in terms of seniority and educational level. On the other hand, there was a significant difference about “social and civic competences” related to gender variable in favor of males. Also a significant difference in terms of subject variable was found between the teachers’ opinions about “communication in foreign languages” competence. Based on these results, implications were listed to the stakeholders of education and researchers.","PeriodicalId":187170,"journal":{"name":"Milli Eğitim Dergisi","volume":"175 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milli Eğitim Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1283252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the opinions of secondary school teachers about the acquisition of eight key competences in the curriculum. In accordance with this aim, it was analyzed whether there was a significant difference between the opinions of teachers in terms of gender, seniority, educational level and subject variables. The descriptive survey method, one of the quantitative research designs, was used in the research. The sample, consisted of 444 secondary school teachers lectured at the official secondary schools in the 2021-2022 academic year, was selected by convenient sampling method. The five-point Likert-type scale based on competences developed by the researchers was used as the data collection tool. The data obtained were analyzed with descriptive statistics, t-test, One-Way ANOVA and Post Hoc tests by SPSS 21.0 package program. Findings showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the teachers' opinions in terms of seniority and educational level. On the other hand, there was a significant difference about “social and civic competences” related to gender variable in favor of males. Also a significant difference in terms of subject variable was found between the teachers’ opinions about “communication in foreign languages” competence. Based on these results, implications were listed to the stakeholders of education and researchers.
调查教师对课程能力的看法
本研究旨在调查中学教师对获得课程中八种关键能力的看法。根据这一目的,研究分析了教师的观点在性别、资历、教育水平和学科变量方面是否存在显著差异。研究采用了描述性调查法,这是定量研究设计之一。样本由 444 名 2021-2022 学年在官方中学讲课的中学教师组成,采用方便抽样法选出。数据收集工具是研究人员根据能力开发的五点李克特量表。研究人员使用 SPSS 21.0 软件包对所获得的数据进行了描述性统计、t 检验、单向方差分析和事后检验。结果表明,教师的意见在资历和教育水平方面没有明显的统计学差异。另一方面,在与性别变量相关的 "社会和公民能力 "方面,男性与女性之间存在显著差异。在学科变量方面,教师对 "外语交流 "能力的看法也存在明显差异。基于这些结果,我们列出了对教育相关方和研究人员的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信