{"title":"Money Makes The World Go Hot – Climate Litigation Against Banks?","authors":"Peter Rott","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many industrial projects with detrimental effects on the environment and the climate require borrowed capital; which brings the financing banks into the spotlight of climate activism. This is not entirely new, and soft law instruments such as the Equator Principles and the unep fi Principles for Responsible Banking have long recognised the financial industry’s responsibility for environmental protection and, more recently, climate protection. As activism is moving towards litigation, this article explores whether financing banks could be successfully sued to omit the financing of a detrimental project, or to pay for protection against climate risks where they have already done so.","PeriodicalId":37233,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-bja10060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many industrial projects with detrimental effects on the environment and the climate require borrowed capital; which brings the financing banks into the spotlight of climate activism. This is not entirely new, and soft law instruments such as the Equator Principles and the unep fi Principles for Responsible Banking have long recognised the financial industry’s responsibility for environmental protection and, more recently, climate protection. As activism is moving towards litigation, this article explores whether financing banks could be successfully sued to omit the financing of a detrimental project, or to pay for protection against climate risks where they have already done so.
许多对环境和气候有不利影响的工业项目都需要借贷资本,这使得融资银行成为气候行动主义的焦点。这并不是什么新鲜事,《赤道原则》和《unep fi 负责任银行业原则》等软法律文书早已承认金融业对环境保护以及最近的气候保护负有责任。由于激进主义正朝着诉讼的方向发展,本文探讨了是否可以成功起诉融资银行,要求其放弃对有害项目的融资,或要求其在已经这样做的情况下支付气候风险保护费用。