Consequences of capital drain among EU member states

IF 0.5 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
Peter Deďo, David Hána
{"title":"Consequences of capital drain among EU member states","authors":"Peter Deďo, David Hána","doi":"10.14712/23361980.2023.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to analyze the capital drain among individual European Union (EU) member states and its cohesive and political consequences. Since the capital drain has not yet been calculated at the individual country level, the methodological part of this article delves into this calculation in more detail. Between 1999 and 2018, Ireland and Luxembourg had the highest capital drain due to their tax haven policies. Apart from these extremes, Czechia experienced the largest capital drain during this period. Inequalities among EU member states were gradually decreasing in terms of gross domestic product and gross national disposable income, suggesting that the EU’s cohesion policy has partially been successful in reducing inequalities among EU countries. However, capital drain and its populist interpretations may become a significant political problem for the most negatively affected countries.","PeriodicalId":41831,"journal":{"name":"AUC Geographica","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AUC Geographica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2023.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyze the capital drain among individual European Union (EU) member states and its cohesive and political consequences. Since the capital drain has not yet been calculated at the individual country level, the methodological part of this article delves into this calculation in more detail. Between 1999 and 2018, Ireland and Luxembourg had the highest capital drain due to their tax haven policies. Apart from these extremes, Czechia experienced the largest capital drain during this period. Inequalities among EU member states were gradually decreasing in terms of gross domestic product and gross national disposable income, suggesting that the EU’s cohesion policy has partially been successful in reducing inequalities among EU countries. However, capital drain and its populist interpretations may become a significant political problem for the most negatively affected countries.
欧盟成员国之间资本外流的后果
本文旨在分析欧洲联盟(欧盟)各成员国之间的资本外流及其凝聚力和政治后果。由于尚未在单个国家层面计算资本外流,本文的方法论部分将更详细地探讨这一计算方法。1999 年至 2018 年间,爱尔兰和卢森堡因其避税天堂政策而成为资本外流最多的国家。除了这两个极端之外,捷克在此期间的资本外流也最为严重。从国内生产总值和国民可支配总收入来看,欧盟成员国之间的不平等逐渐减少,这表明欧盟的凝聚力政策在一定程度上成功地减少了欧盟国家之间的不平等。然而,资本外流及其民粹主义解释可能会成为受负面影响最大的国家的一个重大政治问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AUC Geographica
AUC Geographica GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信