Phasic and repetitive self-touch differ in hemodynamic response in the prefrontal cortex–An fNIRS study

Sabrina von Au, Ingo Helmich, Simon Kieffer, H. Lausberg
{"title":"Phasic and repetitive self-touch differ in hemodynamic response in the prefrontal cortex–An fNIRS study","authors":"Sabrina von Au, Ingo Helmich, Simon Kieffer, H. Lausberg","doi":"10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1266439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Each individual touches the own body several 100 times a day. While some researchers propose a self-regulatory function of self-touch, others report that self-touching increases nervousness. This controversy appears to be caused by the fact that researchers did not define the kind of self-touch they examined and actually, referred to different types of self-touch. Thus, kinematically defining different types of self-touch, such as phasic (discrete), repetitive, and irregular, and exploring the neural correlates of the different types will provide insight into the neuropsychological function of self-touching behavior.To this aim, we assessed hemodynamic responses in prefrontal brain areas using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and behavioral responses with NEUROGES®. Fifty-two participants were recorded during three specific kinematically types of self-touch (phasic, irregular, repetitive) that were to be performed on command. The recently developed toolbox Satori was used for the visualization of neuronal processes.Behaviorally, the participants did not perform irregular self-touch reliably. Neurally, the comparison of phasic, irregular and repetitive self-touch revealed different activation patterns. Repetitive self-touch is associated with stronger hemodynamic responses in the left Orbitofrontal Cortex and the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex than phasic self-touch.These brain areas have been reported to be associated with self-regulatory processes. Furthermore, irregular self-touch appears to be primarily generated by implicit neural control. Thus, by distinguishing kinematically different types of self-touch, our findings shed light on the controverse discussion on the neuropsychological function of self-touch.","PeriodicalId":507972,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1266439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Each individual touches the own body several 100 times a day. While some researchers propose a self-regulatory function of self-touch, others report that self-touching increases nervousness. This controversy appears to be caused by the fact that researchers did not define the kind of self-touch they examined and actually, referred to different types of self-touch. Thus, kinematically defining different types of self-touch, such as phasic (discrete), repetitive, and irregular, and exploring the neural correlates of the different types will provide insight into the neuropsychological function of self-touching behavior.To this aim, we assessed hemodynamic responses in prefrontal brain areas using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and behavioral responses with NEUROGES®. Fifty-two participants were recorded during three specific kinematically types of self-touch (phasic, irregular, repetitive) that were to be performed on command. The recently developed toolbox Satori was used for the visualization of neuronal processes.Behaviorally, the participants did not perform irregular self-touch reliably. Neurally, the comparison of phasic, irregular and repetitive self-touch revealed different activation patterns. Repetitive self-touch is associated with stronger hemodynamic responses in the left Orbitofrontal Cortex and the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex than phasic self-touch.These brain areas have been reported to be associated with self-regulatory processes. Furthermore, irregular self-touch appears to be primarily generated by implicit neural control. Thus, by distinguishing kinematically different types of self-touch, our findings shed light on the controverse discussion on the neuropsychological function of self-touch.
阶段性和重复性自我触摸对前额叶皮层血液动力学反应的影响不同--一项 fNIRS 研究
每个人每天都要触摸自己的身体几百次。一些研究人员认为自我抚摸具有自我调节功能,而另一些研究人员则认为自我抚摸会增加紧张感。造成这种争议的原因似乎是研究人员没有界定他们所研究的自我抚摸的类型,而实际上是指不同类型的自我抚摸。因此,通过运动学定义不同类型的自我触摸,如阶段性(离散)、重复性和不规则性,并探索不同类型的神经相关性,将有助于深入了解自我触摸行为的神经心理学功能。为此,我们使用功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)评估了前额叶脑区的血液动力学反应,并使用 NEUROGES® 评估了行为反应。我们对 52 名参与者在三种特定运动类型(阶段性、不规则和重复性)的自我触碰过程进行了记录,这些自我触碰都是根据指令进行的。最近开发的工具箱 Satori 被用于神经元过程的可视化。从神经学角度看,对阶段性、不规则和重复性自我触摸的比较显示了不同的激活模式。与阶段性自我触摸相比,重复性自我触摸与左侧眼眶额叶皮层和背外侧前额叶皮层的血液动力学反应相关。此外,不规则的自我触觉似乎主要是由内隐神经控制产生的。因此,通过区分运动学上不同类型的自我触觉,我们的研究结果为有关自我触觉的神经心理学功能的反面讨论提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信