A Critical Review of IELTS Speaking Test

Rita Seroja Ginting, Ahmad Amin Dalimunte, Muhammad Dalimunte, E. Kurniati, Devika Adelita
{"title":"A Critical Review of IELTS Speaking Test","authors":"Rita Seroja Ginting, Ahmad Amin Dalimunte, Muhammad Dalimunte, E. Kurniati, Devika Adelita","doi":"10.32505/jl3t.v9i2.7161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study on content analysis attempts to give detailed examinations of the IELTS Speaking Test. It provides an overview of the aim of tests, as well as their reliability and validity, along with a discussion of language testing during the previous three decades. The merits and limitations of the IELTS Speaking Test were investigated, with an emphasis placed on exam scenarios. Validity, reliability, and application served as the evaluation criteria for this study. The IELTS speaking test is accurate and reliable in general; however, there are a few contentious aspects that may have an effect on the test's reliability and validity. These aspects were investigated and described in this paper. In general, the IELTS speaking test is accurate and reliable. There, the following potential proposals were made: A double-marking technique, a video conference delivery, and an intervention are all examples. The IELTS Speaking Test is one specialized component that is administered in a distinct place from the IELTS Listening, Reading, and Writing tests on the same or a different day. By using the face-to-face method, the examiner only needs to do an evaluation of the candidate's performance once, and the entire process is recorded so that there is a record in case something goes wrong. A few weeks after the test, candidates will receive the results online and by mail. Subjective factors like candidate preferences and marker performance will have a significant impact on the entire testing process and evaluation findings.","PeriodicalId":319735,"journal":{"name":"JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching)","volume":"308 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v9i2.7161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study on content analysis attempts to give detailed examinations of the IELTS Speaking Test. It provides an overview of the aim of tests, as well as their reliability and validity, along with a discussion of language testing during the previous three decades. The merits and limitations of the IELTS Speaking Test were investigated, with an emphasis placed on exam scenarios. Validity, reliability, and application served as the evaluation criteria for this study. The IELTS speaking test is accurate and reliable in general; however, there are a few contentious aspects that may have an effect on the test's reliability and validity. These aspects were investigated and described in this paper. In general, the IELTS speaking test is accurate and reliable. There, the following potential proposals were made: A double-marking technique, a video conference delivery, and an intervention are all examples. The IELTS Speaking Test is one specialized component that is administered in a distinct place from the IELTS Listening, Reading, and Writing tests on the same or a different day. By using the face-to-face method, the examiner only needs to do an evaluation of the candidate's performance once, and the entire process is recorded so that there is a record in case something goes wrong. A few weeks after the test, candidates will receive the results online and by mail. Subjective factors like candidate preferences and marker performance will have a significant impact on the entire testing process and evaluation findings.
雅思口语考试点评
本内容分析研究试图对雅思口语测试进行详细的研究。本研究概述了测试的目的及其可靠性和有效性,并对过去三十年的语言测试进行了讨论。本书以考试场景为重点,对雅思口语测试的优点和局限性进行了研究。有效性、可靠性和应用性是本研究的评价标准。雅思口语测试总体上是准确可靠的,但也有一些有争议的方面可能会影响测试的可靠性和有效性。本文对这些方面进行了调查和描述。总体而言,雅思口语测试是准确可靠的。本文提出了以下可能的建议:例如双重评分技术、视频会议授课和干预措施。雅思口语测试是一个专门的组成部分,与雅思听力、阅读和写作测试在同一天或不同天的不同地点进行。通过采用面对面的方式,考官只需对考生的表现进行一次评估,而且整个过程都会被记录下来,以防出错。考试结束几周后,考生将通过网络和邮件收到成绩。候选人的喜好和标记表现等主观因素将对整个测试过程和评估结果产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信