LITERATUR REVIEW : ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI AUDIT JUDGMENT DI BADAN PEMERIKSAAN KEUANGAN (BPK)

Anisa Syaiffa Pambarumni, Kartika Pradana Suryatimur
{"title":"LITERATUR REVIEW : ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI AUDIT JUDGMENT DI BADAN PEMERIKSAAN KEUANGAN (BPK)","authors":"Anisa Syaiffa Pambarumni, Kartika Pradana Suryatimur","doi":"10.55047/transekonomika.v3i5.535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the realm of public financial oversight, the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) plays a pivotal role, tasked with ensuring the integrity and transparency of financial practices. Within the complex landscape of auditing, the exercise of judgment becomes paramount, especially in situations marked by uncertainty and limited data access. This research aims to find out empirically about the factors that influence audit judgment at the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK), especially gender factors, obedience pressure and auditor experience. Audit judgment is needed when dealing with uncertainty or limited data information obtained, and the audit is also required to make assumptions that are used to make judgments and evaluate judgments. The research was carried out using the literature review method where the research was carried out by collecting a number of articles related to the problems raised by the researcher. The results of the previous literature review show that there are several things that influence audit judgment at BPK such as gender, pressure and auditor experience.","PeriodicalId":342628,"journal":{"name":"Transekonomika: Akuntansi, Bisnis dan Keuangan","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transekonomika: Akuntansi, Bisnis dan Keuangan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55047/transekonomika.v3i5.535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the realm of public financial oversight, the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) plays a pivotal role, tasked with ensuring the integrity and transparency of financial practices. Within the complex landscape of auditing, the exercise of judgment becomes paramount, especially in situations marked by uncertainty and limited data access. This research aims to find out empirically about the factors that influence audit judgment at the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK), especially gender factors, obedience pressure and auditor experience. Audit judgment is needed when dealing with uncertainty or limited data information obtained, and the audit is also required to make assumptions that are used to make judgments and evaluate judgments. The research was carried out using the literature review method where the research was carried out by collecting a number of articles related to the problems raised by the researcher. The results of the previous literature review show that there are several things that influence audit judgment at BPK such as gender, pressure and auditor experience.
文献综述:影响金融审计机构(BPK)审计判断的因素分析
在公共财政监督领域,最高审计署(BPK)发挥着举足轻重的作用,其任务是确保财政行为的完整性和透明度。在复杂的审计环境中,判断力的行使变得至关重要,尤其是在不确定和数据获取有限的情况下。本研究旨在通过实证研究找出影响最高审计机关(BPK)审计判断的因素,尤其是性别因素、服从压力和审计师经验。在处理不确定性或获得的有限数据信息时,需要做出审计判断,而审计也需要做出假设,这些假设用于做出判断和评价判断。研究采用文献综述法,通过收集与研究者提出的问题相关的一些文章来开展研究。之前的文献综述结果表明,在 BPK,影响审计判断的因素有性别、压力和审计师经验等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信