Understanding Physical Literacy of Physical Education Teachers

Rizki Apriliyanto, Ahmad Sulaiman
{"title":"Understanding Physical Literacy of Physical Education Teachers","authors":"Rizki Apriliyanto, Ahmad Sulaiman","doi":"10.33503/jp.jok.v7i1.2443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to ascertain how well physical education teachers comprehend physical literacy. The \"perceived physical literacy instrument\" (PPLI), which has nine items and a validity level of 0.82, is used to test one's comprehension of physical literacy (very good). Purposive sampling is a strategy used to obtain data. A questionnaire based on the PPLI instrument was distributed to 53 physical education instructors in the Jember area in order to gather knowledge data on physical literacy. Overall survey findings revealed that out of 187 questions, (18.86%) of respondents Sangat Setuju d, (42.7%) of respondents Setuju d there were 204 questions, and (18.86%) of respondents indicated they were unsure about the answers to 90 questions. The results indicate that some teachers have a limited grasp of the idea of physical literacy. This explains why physical education lessons must help teachers better comprehend and cultivate physical literacy. Even if physical education instructors' degree of understanding of physical literacy is known, other measurements must be taken to determine the total competency in physical literacy, such as physical competence, motivation, and self-confidence. Given that there are four areas of physical literacy that might be explored or investigated in the future.","PeriodicalId":429971,"journal":{"name":"JP.JOK (Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga dan Kesehatan)","volume":"14 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JP.JOK (Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga dan Kesehatan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33503/jp.jok.v7i1.2443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to ascertain how well physical education teachers comprehend physical literacy. The "perceived physical literacy instrument" (PPLI), which has nine items and a validity level of 0.82, is used to test one's comprehension of physical literacy (very good). Purposive sampling is a strategy used to obtain data. A questionnaire based on the PPLI instrument was distributed to 53 physical education instructors in the Jember area in order to gather knowledge data on physical literacy. Overall survey findings revealed that out of 187 questions, (18.86%) of respondents Sangat Setuju d, (42.7%) of respondents Setuju d there were 204 questions, and (18.86%) of respondents indicated they were unsure about the answers to 90 questions. The results indicate that some teachers have a limited grasp of the idea of physical literacy. This explains why physical education lessons must help teachers better comprehend and cultivate physical literacy. Even if physical education instructors' degree of understanding of physical literacy is known, other measurements must be taken to determine the total competency in physical literacy, such as physical competence, motivation, and self-confidence. Given that there are four areas of physical literacy that might be explored or investigated in the future.
了解体育教师的体育素养
本研究旨在确定体育教师对体育素养的理解程度。感知体育素养工具"(PPLI)有九个项目,效度为 0.82,用于测试一个人对体育素养的理解程度(很好)。目的性抽样是一种获取数据的策略。为了收集有关体育素养的知识数据,我们向金巴地区的 53 名体育教师发放了基于 PPLI 工具的调查问卷。总体调查结果显示,在 187 个问题中,(18.86%)受访者 Sangat Setuju d,(42.7%)受访者 Setuju d 有 204 个问题,(18.86%)受访者表示不确定 90 个问题的答案。结果表明,一些教师对体育素养的概念掌握有限。这就解释了为什么体育课必须帮助教师更好地理解和培养体育素养。即使知道了体育教师对体育素养的理解程度,还必须采取其他措施来确定体育教师在体育素养方面的总体能力,如体育能力、积极性和自信心。鉴于体育素养有四个方面可以在未来进行探索或研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信