PHYSICIANS' ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE APPROACH TO DIABETIC NEUROPATHY IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE HEALTH CARE FACILITIES, 2023

John C. Longa López
{"title":"PHYSICIANS' ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE APPROACH TO DIABETIC NEUROPATHY IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE HEALTH CARE FACILITIES, 2023","authors":"John C. Longa López","doi":"10.25176/rfmh.v23i4.6109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To describe the attitudes of doctors towards the approach to diabetic neuropathy. Methods: descriptive, observational, cross-sectional and prospective study, sample of 143 doctors, non-probabilistic convenience sampling. The variables: years of professional practice, specialty, proportion of patients in the medical consultation with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2), proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus with a diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy, attitudes towards the approach to diabetic neuropathy. A 5-category Likert scale was used to evaluate attitudes in 3 dimensions: prioritization, diagnosis and treatment. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: In the prioritization dimension, 57.4% prioritize metabolic control over the evaluation of complications. Diagnostic dimension: 80.5% of doctors surveyed rely on symptoms and signs reported by the patient to make the diagnosis of said complication, 66.5% recognize that they do not use an instrument for the evaluation of neuropathy and 39.9% would not use it either. had it. In the treatment dimension, 73.5% recognize that analgesic treatment for diabetic neuropathy is frustrating and 50.4% feel “afraid” to titrate the dose of anti-neuropathic analgesic medication due to adverse effects. Conclusions: The attitudes of doctors compromise different areas of the approach to diabetic neuropathy such as prioritization, diagnosis and treatment with a tendency to prioritize metabolic control and other microvascular complications, to under-diagnosis, to “under-treatment”. ” and the need to refer patients for specialized management.","PeriodicalId":33139,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25176/rfmh.v23i4.6109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the attitudes of doctors towards the approach to diabetic neuropathy. Methods: descriptive, observational, cross-sectional and prospective study, sample of 143 doctors, non-probabilistic convenience sampling. The variables: years of professional practice, specialty, proportion of patients in the medical consultation with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2), proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus with a diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy, attitudes towards the approach to diabetic neuropathy. A 5-category Likert scale was used to evaluate attitudes in 3 dimensions: prioritization, diagnosis and treatment. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: In the prioritization dimension, 57.4% prioritize metabolic control over the evaluation of complications. Diagnostic dimension: 80.5% of doctors surveyed rely on symptoms and signs reported by the patient to make the diagnosis of said complication, 66.5% recognize that they do not use an instrument for the evaluation of neuropathy and 39.9% would not use it either. had it. In the treatment dimension, 73.5% recognize that analgesic treatment for diabetic neuropathy is frustrating and 50.4% feel “afraid” to titrate the dose of anti-neuropathic analgesic medication due to adverse effects. Conclusions: The attitudes of doctors compromise different areas of the approach to diabetic neuropathy such as prioritization, diagnosis and treatment with a tendency to prioritize metabolic control and other microvascular complications, to under-diagnosis, to “under-treatment”. ” and the need to refer patients for specialized management.
2023 年公立和私立医疗机构中医生对糖尿病神经病变治疗方法的态度
目的描述医生对糖尿病神经病变治疗方法的态度。方法:描述性、观察性、横断面和前瞻性研究,样本为 143 名医生,非概率方便抽样。变量:从业年限、专业、就诊患者中诊断为糖尿病(1 型或 2 型)的比例、糖尿病患者中诊断为糖尿病神经病变的比例、对糖尿病神经病变治疗方法的态度。采用 5 级李克特量表从优先级、诊断和治疗 3 个维度对态度进行评估。采用了描述性统计方法。结果显示在优先顺序维度上,57.4%的医生将代谢控制置于并发症评估之上。诊断维度:80.5%的受访医生依靠患者报告的症状和体征来诊断所述并发症,66.5%的受访医生承认他们没有使用评估神经病变的仪器,39.9%的受访医生如果有也不会使用。在治疗方面,73.5% 的人认为糖尿病神经病变的镇痛治疗令人沮丧,50.4% 的人认为由于不良反应而 "不敢 "调整抗神经病变镇痛药物的剂量。结论医生的态度损害了糖尿病神经病变治疗方法的不同方面,如优先顺序、诊断和治疗,倾向于优先考虑代谢控制和其他微血管并发症,诊断不足,"治疗不足"。糖尿病神经病变",以及需要将患者转诊接受专门治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信