The Decision of Fedotova v. Russia by the European Court of Human Rights on the Same-Sex Partnership

Jinsu Yune
{"title":"The Decision of Fedotova v. Russia by the European Court of Human Rights on the Same-Sex Partnership","authors":"Jinsu Yune","doi":"10.31998/ksfl.2023.37.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On January 17, 2023, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights ruled in Fedotova v. Russia that Russia’s failure to provide legal recognition to parties in same-sex unions violated Article 8 (Right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights. This article aims to introduce the above judgment. In 2015, the decision of Oliari v. Italy by the European Court of Human Rights opined that Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Right to marry) did not guarantee the right to marry for same-sex couples. However, it declared that Italy bore the positive obligation to provide the legal institution for the protection of the same-sex couple based on the Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Right to respect for private and family life). The Fedotova decision reached the same result against Russia. While the Oliari judgment was based on internal Italian circumstances, the Fedotova decision is significant because it applies not only to Italy and Russia, but to all countries that are party to the European Convention on Human Rights. The Fedotova decision was based on the positive obligation of the state to respect the Convention Right. Whether such a positive obligation can be recognized in Korea requires further discussion.","PeriodicalId":315796,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society Of Family Law","volume":"81 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Society Of Family Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31998/ksfl.2023.37.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On January 17, 2023, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights ruled in Fedotova v. Russia that Russia’s failure to provide legal recognition to parties in same-sex unions violated Article 8 (Right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights. This article aims to introduce the above judgment. In 2015, the decision of Oliari v. Italy by the European Court of Human Rights opined that Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Right to marry) did not guarantee the right to marry for same-sex couples. However, it declared that Italy bore the positive obligation to provide the legal institution for the protection of the same-sex couple based on the Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Right to respect for private and family life). The Fedotova decision reached the same result against Russia. While the Oliari judgment was based on internal Italian circumstances, the Fedotova decision is significant because it applies not only to Italy and Russia, but to all countries that are party to the European Convention on Human Rights. The Fedotova decision was based on the positive obligation of the state to respect the Convention Right. Whether such a positive obligation can be recognized in Korea requires further discussion.
欧洲人权法院就 "费多托娃诉俄罗斯 "案做出的关于同性伴侣关系的裁决
2023 年 1 月 17 日,欧洲人权法院大法庭在 "费多托娃诉俄罗斯 "一案中裁定,俄罗斯未对同性结合双方给予法律承认,违反了《欧洲人权公约》第 8 条(尊重私人和家庭生活的权利)。本文旨在介绍上述判决。 2015 年,欧洲人权法院在 "Oliari 诉意大利 "一案的判决中认为,《欧洲人权公约》第 12 条(结婚权)并未保障同性伴侣的结婚权。然而,欧洲人权法院宣布,根据《欧洲人权公约》第 8 条(尊重私人和家庭生活的权利),意大利负有提供法律机构保护同性伴侣的积极义务。 针对俄罗斯的 Fedotova 案判决也得出了同样的结果。Oliari 案的判决是基于意大利国内的情况,而 Fedotova 案的判决则具有重要意义,因为它不仅适用于意大利和俄罗斯,而且适用于《欧洲人权公约》的所有缔约国。 Fedotova 案的判决基于国家尊重公约权利的积极义务。韩国是否承认这种积极义务还需要进一步讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信