Comparison of The Diagnosis Peculiarities of Familial Tuberculosis

I. Duzhyi, N.M. Kyrychenko, V. Hlynenko
{"title":"Comparison of The Diagnosis Peculiarities of Familial Tuberculosis","authors":"I. Duzhyi, N.M. Kyrychenko, V. Hlynenko","doi":"10.30978/tb-2023-4-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective — to compare the diagnostic features of individuals with family tuberculosis within the context of reorganizing the tuberculosis control service. Materials and methods. The study involved the analysis of diagnostic results and management of 406 patients within a cluster of family tuberculosis. Among them, 207 patients were identified as the source of tuberculosis (comparison group), and 199 were contacts who contracted the disease from individuals in the comparison group. Patients in the comparison group were examined by family doctors, while contacts were evaluated by phthisiologists. Results and discussion. Patients in the comparison group served as carriers of pulmonary tuberculosis in 201 (97.1 %) cases and extrapulmonary tuberculosis in 6 (2.9 %) cases. Concurrent illnesses were detected in 114 (55.1 %) individuals. Upon consulting family doctors within the first 5 days of examination, the diagnosis was not established in the comparison group. However, within 20 days, it was verified in 164 (79.2 %) patients. In the main group, pulmonary forms of the disease were observed in 173 (86.9 %) patients, while extrapulmonary forms were present in 26 (13.1 %). Diagnosis was established within 5 days in 94 (47.2 %) individuals and within 10 days in 77 (37.7 %). Overall, within the first 10 days, pulmonary diagnosis was verified in 173 (86.3 %) patients in the main group, as opposed to 18 (8.7 %) in the comparison group, representing a 9.9-fold difference (p < 0.001). Conclusions. Given that 114 patients in the comparison group had concurrent illnesses over many years, their tuberculosis manifestation was treated as «known» to the patient and the attending physi­cian, leading to a delay in diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis by more than 20 days. Patients in the main group sought medical attention by reporting contact with tuberculosis patients, resulting in consultations with phthisiologists and, consequently, a 9.9-fold faster verification of pulmonary tuberculosis. Screening of individuals suspected of tuberculosis should be promptly conducted by phthisiologists.","PeriodicalId":292478,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis, Lung Diseases, HIV Infection","volume":"233 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis, Lung Diseases, HIV Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30978/tb-2023-4-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective — to compare the diagnostic features of individuals with family tuberculosis within the context of reorganizing the tuberculosis control service. Materials and methods. The study involved the analysis of diagnostic results and management of 406 patients within a cluster of family tuberculosis. Among them, 207 patients were identified as the source of tuberculosis (comparison group), and 199 were contacts who contracted the disease from individuals in the comparison group. Patients in the comparison group were examined by family doctors, while contacts were evaluated by phthisiologists. Results and discussion. Patients in the comparison group served as carriers of pulmonary tuberculosis in 201 (97.1 %) cases and extrapulmonary tuberculosis in 6 (2.9 %) cases. Concurrent illnesses were detected in 114 (55.1 %) individuals. Upon consulting family doctors within the first 5 days of examination, the diagnosis was not established in the comparison group. However, within 20 days, it was verified in 164 (79.2 %) patients. In the main group, pulmonary forms of the disease were observed in 173 (86.9 %) patients, while extrapulmonary forms were present in 26 (13.1 %). Diagnosis was established within 5 days in 94 (47.2 %) individuals and within 10 days in 77 (37.7 %). Overall, within the first 10 days, pulmonary diagnosis was verified in 173 (86.3 %) patients in the main group, as opposed to 18 (8.7 %) in the comparison group, representing a 9.9-fold difference (p < 0.001). Conclusions. Given that 114 patients in the comparison group had concurrent illnesses over many years, their tuberculosis manifestation was treated as «known» to the patient and the attending physi­cian, leading to a delay in diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis by more than 20 days. Patients in the main group sought medical attention by reporting contact with tuberculosis patients, resulting in consultations with phthisiologists and, consequently, a 9.9-fold faster verification of pulmonary tuberculosis. Screening of individuals suspected of tuberculosis should be promptly conducted by phthisiologists.
比较家族性肺结核的诊断特点
目的--在结核病防治服务重组的背景下,比较家庭结核病患者的诊断特征。材料和方法。研究分析了一个家庭结核病群中 406 名患者的诊断结果和管理情况。其中,207 名患者被确定为结核病源(对比组),199 名患者为从对比组患者处感染结核病的接触者。对比组患者由家庭医生进行检查,而接触者则由呼吸科医生进行评估。结果与讨论。对比组患者中有 201 例(97.1%)为肺结核携带者,6 例(2.9%)为肺外结核病携带者。有 114 人(55.1%)同时患有其他疾病。在检查后的头 5 天内咨询家庭医生时,对比组的诊断结果尚未确定。但在 20 天内,164 名患者(79.2%)的诊断得到了证实。在主要组别中,有 173 名患者(86.9%)被确诊为肺部疾病,26 名患者(13.1%)被确诊为肺外疾病。有 94 人(47.2%)在 5 天内确诊,77 人(37.7%)在 10 天内确诊。总体而言,在最初的 10 天内,主要研究组有 173 例(86.3%)患者的肺部诊断得到了证实,而对比组只有 18 例(8.7%),两者相差 9.9 倍(P < 0.001)。结论由于对比组中有 114 名患者多年并发疾病,其肺结核表现被患者和主治医生视为 "已知",导致肺结核诊断延迟 20 多天。主要群体中的病人通过报告与肺结核病人的接触而就医,结果得到了咽喉科医生的诊治,从而使肺结核的核实速度加快了 9.9 倍。对肺结核疑似患者的筛查应由呼吸科医生及时进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信