Mapping the Evolution of Sustainability Transitions Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.5530/jscires.12.3.050
Sunny Dhiman, Rajbeer Singh, V. Arjune, R. S. Yadav, Mritunjay Singh Yadav, Albert Bansala
{"title":"Mapping the Evolution of Sustainability Transitions Research: A Bibliometric Analysis","authors":"Sunny Dhiman, Rajbeer Singh, V. Arjune, R. S. Yadav, Mritunjay Singh Yadav, Albert Bansala","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.3.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Sustainability Transitions (ST) research has emerged as a promising approach to addressing climate change-led uncertainty. The ST research primarily emerged and concentrated in global north countries, but the global south has witnessed significant development. A gap in the bibliometric analysis of evolution ST research and its geography is addressed. The questions are, how has ST research evolved over the years (1994 to 2021), and how has ST research evolution reflected the dynamics of geographies? The ST literature is examined from the Scopus citation database (from 1994 to 2021). Results suggest that the ST research evolved in the Lag phase (1994 to 2002) and growth phase (2002 to 2021) as an S curve in Science Policy studies. The western geography of Europe is the origin and significant contributor to the location of authors, collaboration, and receiving the highest citation of publications. China, Brazil, India and South Africa are major non-OECD leading countries in ST research. The Dutch ST research has witnessed the highest impact. Most of the journals on ST research are published in the UK, out top 20 journals in the world. The research support and more numbers of researchers have led to the dominance of European countries in ST research. Finally, the study suggests that global sustainability issues necessitate an inclusive and diverse approach to ST research, incorporating knowledge from the global south.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.3.050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Sustainability Transitions (ST) research has emerged as a promising approach to addressing climate change-led uncertainty. The ST research primarily emerged and concentrated in global north countries, but the global south has witnessed significant development. A gap in the bibliometric analysis of evolution ST research and its geography is addressed. The questions are, how has ST research evolved over the years (1994 to 2021), and how has ST research evolution reflected the dynamics of geographies? The ST literature is examined from the Scopus citation database (from 1994 to 2021). Results suggest that the ST research evolved in the Lag phase (1994 to 2002) and growth phase (2002 to 2021) as an S curve in Science Policy studies. The western geography of Europe is the origin and significant contributor to the location of authors, collaboration, and receiving the highest citation of publications. China, Brazil, India and South Africa are major non-OECD leading countries in ST research. The Dutch ST research has witnessed the highest impact. Most of the journals on ST research are published in the UK, out top 20 journals in the world. The research support and more numbers of researchers have led to the dominance of European countries in ST research. Finally, the study suggests that global sustainability issues necessitate an inclusive and diverse approach to ST research, incorporating knowledge from the global south.
分享
查看原文
绘制可持续性过渡研究的演变图:文献计量分析
可持续性过渡(ST)研究已成为应对气候变化导致的不确定性的一种有前途的方法。可持续性过渡研究主要出现并集中在全球北方国家,但全球南方国家也取得了重大发展。本报告探讨了对转型研究的文献计量分析及其地域分布方面的空白。问题是:这些年来(1994 年至 2021 年)ST 研究是如何发展的?我们从 Scopus 引文数据库(1994 年至 2021 年)中对 ST 文献进行了研究。结果表明,ST 研究在滞后阶段(1994 年至 2002 年)和增长阶段(2002 年至 2021 年)的演变就像科学政策研究中的 S 曲线。欧洲西部地区是作者所在地、合作地和出版物引用率最高的地区,也是重要的贡献者。中国、巴西、印度和南非是非经合组织国家在科技研究方面的主要领先国家。荷兰的科技研究影响最大。大多数科技研究期刊都在英国出版,在世界排名前 20 位的期刊中位居前列。研究支持和更多的研究人员使得欧洲国家在科技研究方面占据主导地位。最后,研究表明,全球可持续发展问题要求在科技研究中采用包容和多样化的方法,纳入来自全球南部的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信