Munich Agreement(1938) and Eastern Europe, Geopolitical Crisis and Its Characteristics: Focusing on the Kingdom of Yugoslavia

Chul-Min Kim
{"title":"Munich Agreement(1938) and Eastern Europe, Geopolitical Crisis and Its Characteristics: Focusing on the Kingdom of Yugoslavia","authors":"Chul-Min Kim","doi":"10.19170/eebs.2023.47.4.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the Great Depression of 1929, the international order accepted the territorial invasion and expansion of the Powers into weak countries to secure space for their survival as a natural evolutionary development process. And the basis for justifying this was Haushofer’s Lebensraum theory, which combined Darwin’s theory of evolution with sociology. This study aims to analyze Lebensraum among geopolitical theories, which provided the theoretical basis for Germany’s territorial expansion and racial nationalism. The Munich Agreement (September 1938) was the result of Lebensraum theory. In this study, I would like to analyze the impact of the Munich Agreement on the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and its characteristics. In Chapter II of this study, based on the geopolitical values of Eastern Europe asserted by Mackinder and Spykman, I explain how Haushofer’s Lebensraum theory influenced the geopolitical crisis in Eastern Europe. In addition, I would like to introduce the process of concluding the Munich Agreement, one of the Lebensraum outcomes, and the impact this agreement had on Eastern European countries. In Chapter III, I analyze how the Munich Agreement affected Yugoslavia and what the process was like, focusing on three characteristics: first, the expansion of internal instability, second, the forced choice to bandwagon strategy, and third, the division of the kingdom of Yugoslavia. Lastly, in the conclusion of Chapter IV, I recall the geopolitical value of Eastern Europe in today’s new Cold War, and I would like to explain what lessons and implications this study provides to the Korean Peninsula, which is in a geopolitical position(Rimland) similar to Eastern Europe.","PeriodicalId":142621,"journal":{"name":"East European and Balkan Institute","volume":"1272 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European and Balkan Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19170/eebs.2023.47.4.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the Great Depression of 1929, the international order accepted the territorial invasion and expansion of the Powers into weak countries to secure space for their survival as a natural evolutionary development process. And the basis for justifying this was Haushofer’s Lebensraum theory, which combined Darwin’s theory of evolution with sociology. This study aims to analyze Lebensraum among geopolitical theories, which provided the theoretical basis for Germany’s territorial expansion and racial nationalism. The Munich Agreement (September 1938) was the result of Lebensraum theory. In this study, I would like to analyze the impact of the Munich Agreement on the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and its characteristics. In Chapter II of this study, based on the geopolitical values of Eastern Europe asserted by Mackinder and Spykman, I explain how Haushofer’s Lebensraum theory influenced the geopolitical crisis in Eastern Europe. In addition, I would like to introduce the process of concluding the Munich Agreement, one of the Lebensraum outcomes, and the impact this agreement had on Eastern European countries. In Chapter III, I analyze how the Munich Agreement affected Yugoslavia and what the process was like, focusing on three characteristics: first, the expansion of internal instability, second, the forced choice to bandwagon strategy, and third, the division of the kingdom of Yugoslavia. Lastly, in the conclusion of Chapter IV, I recall the geopolitical value of Eastern Europe in today’s new Cold War, and I would like to explain what lessons and implications this study provides to the Korean Peninsula, which is in a geopolitical position(Rimland) similar to Eastern Europe.
慕尼黑协定》(1938 年)与东欧、地缘政治危机及其特点:以南斯拉夫王国为重点
1929 年经济大萧条之后,国际秩序接受了列强对弱国的领土入侵和扩张,以确保其生存空间,认为这是一个自然的进化发展过程。豪肖弗(Haushofer)的 "生存空间"(Lebensraum)理论将达尔文的进化论与社会学相结合,为这一理论提供了依据。本研究旨在分析地缘政治理论中的Lebensraum理论,该理论为德国的领土扩张和种族民族主义提供了理论基础。慕尼黑协定》(1938 年 9 月)是 Lebensraum 理论的成果。在本研究中,我想分析《慕尼黑协定》对南斯拉夫王国的影响及其特点。 在本研究的第二章中,基于麦金德(Mackinder)和斯派克曼(Spykman)所主张的东欧地缘政治价值观,我解释了豪舍费尔(Haushofer)的 "居住地"(Lebensraum)理论如何影响了东欧的地缘政治危机。此外,我还想介绍作为 Lebensraum 成果之一的《慕尼黑协定》的缔结过程,以及该协定对东欧国家的影响。在第三章中,我分析了《慕尼黑协定》对南斯拉夫的影响以及这一过程的特点,主要集中在三个方面:第一,内部不稳定因素的扩大;第二,被迫选择波段战略;第三,南斯拉夫王国的分裂。最后,在第四章的结论部分,我回顾了东欧在当今新冷战中的地缘政治价值,并想说明本研究为处于与东欧类似的地缘政治地位(边缘地带)的朝鲜半岛提供了哪些经验教训和启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信