{"title":"Trial-and-error modeling of ground-airborne electromagnetic data in the Yishu faulting basin, China","authors":"Ming Zhang, Colin G Farquharson, Tingting Lin","doi":"10.1190/geo2022-0452.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trial-and-error modeling may provide some level of interpretation of the subsurface while sacrificing certainty, and certainty it is a viable alternative for precise three-dimensional (3D) interpretation of real ground-airborne frequency-domain electromagnetic (GAFEM) data. Therefore, a semiautomatic trial-and-error modeling approach has been presented in this study. We first developed a 3D GAFEM forward modeling code. Its accuracy was demonstrated using a 3D synthetic model with a topography and a tilted anomalous body. An initial model was established based on known geological constraints. The code was repeated, and the parameters of the model were renewed semi-automatically based on a predefined geometry-resistivity combination list. The model that could achieve the minimum error between the computed response and collected GAFEM data was selected as the final model. We applied the proposed semi-automatic trial-and-error modeling approach to a geothermal resource survey in the Yishu Faulting Basin, China. The purpose of this survey was to interpret the resistivity structure of the subsurface and evaluate the potential development of geothermal resources in the survey area. The final model obtained by trial-and-error modeling, which was constrained by known geological information and subsurface geoelectric structures inferred from 2D models inverted by the CSAMT and MT data measured at the same location, indicated the existence of geothermal resources. This indication was supported by drilling results from a well site located on the survey line. A comparative analysis was also conducted between the model obtained by trial-and-error modeling and the models obtained by 3D inversion of the GAFEM dataset. The apparent resistivity was calculated using the same data. The results have shown that different approaches can achieve similar subsurface geometries and resistivity distributions for faulting basin structures.","PeriodicalId":55102,"journal":{"name":"Geophysics","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2022-0452.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Trial-and-error modeling may provide some level of interpretation of the subsurface while sacrificing certainty, and certainty it is a viable alternative for precise three-dimensional (3D) interpretation of real ground-airborne frequency-domain electromagnetic (GAFEM) data. Therefore, a semiautomatic trial-and-error modeling approach has been presented in this study. We first developed a 3D GAFEM forward modeling code. Its accuracy was demonstrated using a 3D synthetic model with a topography and a tilted anomalous body. An initial model was established based on known geological constraints. The code was repeated, and the parameters of the model were renewed semi-automatically based on a predefined geometry-resistivity combination list. The model that could achieve the minimum error between the computed response and collected GAFEM data was selected as the final model. We applied the proposed semi-automatic trial-and-error modeling approach to a geothermal resource survey in the Yishu Faulting Basin, China. The purpose of this survey was to interpret the resistivity structure of the subsurface and evaluate the potential development of geothermal resources in the survey area. The final model obtained by trial-and-error modeling, which was constrained by known geological information and subsurface geoelectric structures inferred from 2D models inverted by the CSAMT and MT data measured at the same location, indicated the existence of geothermal resources. This indication was supported by drilling results from a well site located on the survey line. A comparative analysis was also conducted between the model obtained by trial-and-error modeling and the models obtained by 3D inversion of the GAFEM dataset. The apparent resistivity was calculated using the same data. The results have shown that different approaches can achieve similar subsurface geometries and resistivity distributions for faulting basin structures.
期刊介绍:
Geophysics, published by the Society of Exploration Geophysicists since 1936, is an archival journal encompassing all aspects of research, exploration, and education in applied geophysics.
Geophysics articles, generally more than 275 per year in six issues, cover the entire spectrum of geophysical methods, including seismology, potential fields, electromagnetics, and borehole measurements. Geophysics, a bimonthly, provides theoretical and mathematical tools needed to reproduce depicted work, encouraging further development and research.
Geophysics papers, drawn from industry and academia, undergo a rigorous peer-review process to validate the described methods and conclusions and ensure the highest editorial and production quality. Geophysics editors strongly encourage the use of real data, including actual case histories, to highlight current technology and tutorials to stimulate ideas. Some issues feature a section of solicited papers on a particular subject of current interest. Recent special sections focused on seismic anisotropy, subsalt exploration and development, and microseismic monitoring.
The PDF format of each Geophysics paper is the official version of record.