Developing a Sample Frame from Multiple Sample Frame Sources and Fielding a Survey to State and City Leaders

Martha Kovac, Nancy Clusen, Jared Coopersmith, Nadia Bell, Emily Newton-Hoe
{"title":"Developing a Sample Frame from Multiple Sample Frame Sources and Fielding a Survey to State and City Leaders","authors":"Martha Kovac, Nancy Clusen, Jared Coopersmith, Nadia Bell, Emily Newton-Hoe","doi":"10.29115/sp-2023-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A critical driver of population health, well-being, and equity is making health a shared value, or the belief that health is a priority for oneself and one’s community. For people in positions of influence, attitudes regarding their organization’s perspective may result in decisions that advance health equity or reinforce inequities, yet little is known about leaders’ attitudes regarding their organization’s perspective on what shapes health, or how their attitudes translate into actions that improve population health. We conducted a mixed-mode survey from fall 2020 to spring 2022. The objectives of the survey were (1) to understand leaders’ attitudes regarding their organization’s perspective on population health and (2) to identify the attitudes associated with leaders’ perspectives regarding their organization’s intention to engage in behaviors that advance population health. Findings from this survey will fill the gaps in the evidence base regarding what people in positions of influence think about social determinants of health and health equity, as well as their attitudes regarding their organization’s perspective. A major challenge for the study was identifying the sample frame, meant to provide a list of all U.S. leaders at the city and state level covering ten sectors. We identified five sample frame sources from which we pulled and constructed a sample frame. We sampled 17,400 organizations and obtained completed surveys from 5,450 leaders, achieving a 32 percent response rate. We used the best sample frame sources we knew of to develop our sample frame. The percent of contact information we obtained from the five sample frame sources was high, and rates of ineligibility were low. Response rates varied widely by sector. Survey respondents tended to be slightly more male and very slightly more White compared to the full eligible sample, and more liberal than the general population.","PeriodicalId":74893,"journal":{"name":"Survey practice","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2023-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A critical driver of population health, well-being, and equity is making health a shared value, or the belief that health is a priority for oneself and one’s community. For people in positions of influence, attitudes regarding their organization’s perspective may result in decisions that advance health equity or reinforce inequities, yet little is known about leaders’ attitudes regarding their organization’s perspective on what shapes health, or how their attitudes translate into actions that improve population health. We conducted a mixed-mode survey from fall 2020 to spring 2022. The objectives of the survey were (1) to understand leaders’ attitudes regarding their organization’s perspective on population health and (2) to identify the attitudes associated with leaders’ perspectives regarding their organization’s intention to engage in behaviors that advance population health. Findings from this survey will fill the gaps in the evidence base regarding what people in positions of influence think about social determinants of health and health equity, as well as their attitudes regarding their organization’s perspective. A major challenge for the study was identifying the sample frame, meant to provide a list of all U.S. leaders at the city and state level covering ten sectors. We identified five sample frame sources from which we pulled and constructed a sample frame. We sampled 17,400 organizations and obtained completed surveys from 5,450 leaders, achieving a 32 percent response rate. We used the best sample frame sources we knew of to develop our sample frame. The percent of contact information we obtained from the five sample frame sources was high, and rates of ineligibility were low. Response rates varied widely by sector. Survey respondents tended to be slightly more male and very slightly more White compared to the full eligible sample, and more liberal than the general population.
从多个样本框来源中制定样本框,并对州和市领导进行实地调查
人口健康、福祉和公平的一个重要驱动因素是将健康作为一种共同价值,或者说将健康作为自身和社区的优先事项。对于处于有影响力地位的人来说,对其组织观点的态度可能会导致做出促进健康公平或加剧不公平的决策,然而,人们对领导者对其组织关于塑造健康的观点的态度,以及他们的态度如何转化为改善人口健康的行动知之甚少。我们在 2020 年秋季至 2022 年春季进行了一项混合模式调查。调查的目的是:(1)了解领导者对其组织的人口健康观点的态度;(2)确定领导者对其组织参与促进人口健康行为的意向的态度。这项调查的结果将填补证据库中的空白,即处于有影响力地位的人对健康的社会决定因素和健康公平的看法,以及他们对其组织观点的态度。这项研究面临的一大挑战是确定样本框架,即提供一份涵盖十个部门的所有美国市州级领导人的名单。我们确定了五个样本框架来源,并从中提取和构建了一个样本框架。我们抽样调查了 17,400 个组织,从 5,450 位领导人那里获得了完整的调查问卷,回复率为 32%。我们使用了我们所知道的最好的样本框架来源来建立我们的样本框架。我们从五个样本框架来源获得的联系信息比例很高,不合格率也很低。各部门的回复率差异很大。与全部符合条件的样本相比,调查对象中男性略多,白人略多,而且比一般人更自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信