Anti-corruption corporate disclosures and earnings management: evidence from a developed market

Q1 Social Sciences
Mohamed E. Elmaghrabi, Ahmed Diab
{"title":"Anti-corruption corporate disclosures and earnings management: evidence from a developed market","authors":"Mohamed E. Elmaghrabi, Ahmed Diab","doi":"10.1108/jfc-09-2023-0235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to examine the association between anti-corruption corporate disclosure and earnings management practices by bringing evidence from a developed market. Design/methodology/approach The study uses data from non-financial FTSE 100 Shares in 2016 and 2017. This study develops a disclosure index to capture the anti-corruption disclosures and run pooled, fixed effects and generalized methods of moments regression models to explore the anti-corruption disclosure–earnings management association. This study also disentangles discretionary accruals into positive and negative, use adjusted discretionary accrual computation and take a more conservative view on discretionary accruals computation as an additional analysis. Findings The results show a negative and significant association between anti-corruption disclosure and earnings management practices. When disentangling discretionary accruals (overvalued/positive and undervalued/negative), the authors found that higher anti-corruption disclosures were negatively associated with positive discretionary accruals, but not associated with negative discretionary accruals. The additional analysis confirmed the previous results, showing that anti-corruption disclosures are perceived as a substantive practice, rather than a mere disclosure practice for legitimacy reasons. Originality/value This study contributes to debate on the symbolic versus the substantive uses of anti-corruption disclosures in the UK context.","PeriodicalId":38940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Crime","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Crime","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-09-2023-0235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the association between anti-corruption corporate disclosure and earnings management practices by bringing evidence from a developed market. Design/methodology/approach The study uses data from non-financial FTSE 100 Shares in 2016 and 2017. This study develops a disclosure index to capture the anti-corruption disclosures and run pooled, fixed effects and generalized methods of moments regression models to explore the anti-corruption disclosure–earnings management association. This study also disentangles discretionary accruals into positive and negative, use adjusted discretionary accrual computation and take a more conservative view on discretionary accruals computation as an additional analysis. Findings The results show a negative and significant association between anti-corruption disclosure and earnings management practices. When disentangling discretionary accruals (overvalued/positive and undervalued/negative), the authors found that higher anti-corruption disclosures were negatively associated with positive discretionary accruals, but not associated with negative discretionary accruals. The additional analysis confirmed the previous results, showing that anti-corruption disclosures are perceived as a substantive practice, rather than a mere disclosure practice for legitimacy reasons. Originality/value This study contributes to debate on the symbolic versus the substantive uses of anti-corruption disclosures in the UK context.
公司反腐败信息披露与收益管理:来自发达市场的证据
目的 本研究旨在通过提供发达市场的证据,探讨反腐败企业信息披露与收益管理实践之间的关联。 设计/方法/途径 本研究使用 2016 年和 2017 年非金融类富时 100 指数股票的数据。本研究开发了一个信息披露指数来捕捉反腐败信息披露,并运行集合、固定效应和广义矩回归模型来探讨反腐败信息披露与收益管理的关联。本研究还将可自由支配的应计项目分为正应计项目和负应计项目,使用调整后的可自由支配的应计项目计算方法,并对可自由支配的应计项目计算方法采取更保守的观点作为补充分析。 研究结果 研究结果表明,反腐败信息披露与收益管理实践之间存在显著的负相关关系。在对酌情应计项目(高估/积极和低估/消极)进行分解时,作者发现,较高的反腐败信息披露与积极的酌情应计项目呈负相关,但与消极的酌情应计项目无关。补充分析证实了之前的结果,表明反腐败披露被视为一种实质性做法,而不仅仅是出于合法性原因的披露做法。 原创性/价值 本研究有助于在英国背景下就反腐败披露的象征性用途与实质性用途进行辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Crime
Journal of Financial Crime Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Crime, the leading journal in this field, publishes authoritative, practical and detailed insight in the most serious and topical issues relating to the control and prevention of financial crime and related abuse. The journal''s articles are authored by some of the leading international scholars and practitioners in the fields of law, criminology, economics, criminal justice and compliance. Consequently, articles are perceptive, evidence based and have policy impact. The journal covers a wide range of current topics including, but not limited to: • Tracing through the civil law of the proceeds of fraud • Cyber-crime: prevention and detection • Intelligence led investigations • Whistleblowing and the payment of rewards for information • Identity fraud • Insider dealing prosecutions • Specialised anti-corruption investigations • Underground banking systems • Asset tracing and forfeiture • Securities regulation and enforcement • Tax regimes and tax avoidance • Deferred prosecution agreements • Personal liability of compliance managers and professional advisers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信