PROBING-PROMPTING LEARNING: ITS EFFECT ON IMPROVING CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IN MATHEMATICS

Ulfa Hanifa, Suhendra Suhendra, Muhammad Fakhri Jauhari
{"title":"PROBING-PROMPTING LEARNING: ITS EFFECT ON IMPROVING CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IN MATHEMATICS","authors":"Ulfa Hanifa, Suhendra Suhendra, Muhammad Fakhri Jauhari","doi":"10.22236/kalamatika.vol8no2.2023pp207-220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding mathematical concepts plays a crucial role in students achieving favorable learning outcomes. However, there remains room for improvement in students' grasp of these concepts. The main objective of this research was to assess how effective the probing prompting learning model is in improving students' understanding of mathematical concepts. This research employed the quantitative approach with the experimental method. Used tests, observations, and questionnaires to collect the data. The study included 25 students in the experimental group and 26 students in the control group. The findings showed: 1) The average percentage of teacher activity was 96.30% (“very good” category); 2) The t-test analysis findings showed a significant difference in the enhancement of understanding of mathematical concepts between students exposed to the probing prompting learning model (high category) and those using conventional learning approach; 3) Students responded positively to the probing prompting learning model, as evidenced by their attitude. In conclusion, this study suggests that the probing prompting learning model can serve as an effective alternative for facilitating learning and improving students' understanding of mathematical concepts.","PeriodicalId":326644,"journal":{"name":"Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22236/kalamatika.vol8no2.2023pp207-220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding mathematical concepts plays a crucial role in students achieving favorable learning outcomes. However, there remains room for improvement in students' grasp of these concepts. The main objective of this research was to assess how effective the probing prompting learning model is in improving students' understanding of mathematical concepts. This research employed the quantitative approach with the experimental method. Used tests, observations, and questionnaires to collect the data. The study included 25 students in the experimental group and 26 students in the control group. The findings showed: 1) The average percentage of teacher activity was 96.30% (“very good” category); 2) The t-test analysis findings showed a significant difference in the enhancement of understanding of mathematical concepts between students exposed to the probing prompting learning model (high category) and those using conventional learning approach; 3) Students responded positively to the probing prompting learning model, as evidenced by their attitude. In conclusion, this study suggests that the probing prompting learning model can serve as an effective alternative for facilitating learning and improving students' understanding of mathematical concepts.
探究-启发式学习:对提高数学概念理解能力的影响
理解数学概念对学生取得良好的学习效果起着至关重要的作用。然而,学生对这些概念的掌握仍有改进的余地。本研究的主要目的是评估探究提示学习模式在提高学生对数学概念的理解方面的有效性。本研究采用了实验法的定量方法。使用测试、观察和问卷来收集数据。实验组有 25 名学生,对照组有 26 名学生。研究结果显示1)教师活动的平均比例为 96.30%("非常好 "类);2)t 检验分析结果显示,在提高对数学概念的理解方面,接触探究提示学习模式(高类)的学生与使用传统学习方法的学生之间存在显著差异;3)学生对探究提示学习模式反应积极,这从他们的态度中可以得到证明。总之,本研究表明,探究提示学习模式可作为促进学习和提高学生对数学概念理解的有效替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信