Online Interaction Techniques Used at a Rural-Based University: Implications for Online Pedagogy

Q3 Social Sciences
C. Maphosa, Geesje van den Berg
{"title":"Online Interaction Techniques Used at a Rural-Based University: Implications for Online Pedagogy","authors":"C. Maphosa, Geesje van den Berg","doi":"10.26803/ijlter.22.11.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online learning is often associated with student isolation, loneliness, and lack of adequate opportunities for interaction. This study, part of a more extensive study on online interaction, sought to establish from the distance education students' point of view the common techniques employed to promote online interaction. The Community of Inquiry (CoI) developed by Garrison, Anderson, and Archer (2001) informed the study. The study used a post-positivist research paradigm and followed a mixed-method research approach and a concurrent triangulation design. A stratified random sample of 361 students was used to collect quantitative data using a highly structured questionnaire. Qualitative data were collected from four focus groups. Quantitative data were analysed by SPSS using descriptive statistics. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. The two data sets were merged at the interpretation stage. Ethical issues such as study approval, ethical clearance, and informed consent were addressed. The study found that common and uncommon online interaction techniques were used. In instances where techniques were commonly used, it was indicative of the pedagogical abilities of the course instructors. On the contrary, where techniques were uncommon, it pointed out existing pedagogical deficiencies. The study concludes that online pedagogies that promote interaction and achieve higher-order learning outcomes should be built into online course design and implementation.","PeriodicalId":37101,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.11.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online learning is often associated with student isolation, loneliness, and lack of adequate opportunities for interaction. This study, part of a more extensive study on online interaction, sought to establish from the distance education students' point of view the common techniques employed to promote online interaction. The Community of Inquiry (CoI) developed by Garrison, Anderson, and Archer (2001) informed the study. The study used a post-positivist research paradigm and followed a mixed-method research approach and a concurrent triangulation design. A stratified random sample of 361 students was used to collect quantitative data using a highly structured questionnaire. Qualitative data were collected from four focus groups. Quantitative data were analysed by SPSS using descriptive statistics. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. The two data sets were merged at the interpretation stage. Ethical issues such as study approval, ethical clearance, and informed consent were addressed. The study found that common and uncommon online interaction techniques were used. In instances where techniques were commonly used, it was indicative of the pedagogical abilities of the course instructors. On the contrary, where techniques were uncommon, it pointed out existing pedagogical deficiencies. The study concludes that online pedagogies that promote interaction and achieve higher-order learning outcomes should be built into online course design and implementation.
一所农村大学使用的在线互动技术:对在线教学法的启示
在线学习往往与学生的孤立、孤独和缺乏足够的互动机会联系在一起。本研究是一项更广泛的在线互动研究的一部分,旨在从远程教育学生的角度出发,确定促进在线互动的常用技巧。由 Garrison、Anderson 和 Archer(2001 年)开发的 "探究社区"(CoI)为本研究提供了参考。本研究采用了后实证主义研究范式,并遵循混合方法研究法和并行三角测量设计。使用高度结构化的调查问卷,对 361 名学生进行分层随机抽样,收集定量数据。从四个焦点小组中收集了定性数据。定量数据由 SPSS 使用描述性统计进行分析。定性数据采用主题内容分析法进行分析。两组数据在解释阶段进行了合并。研究审批、伦理审查和知情同意等伦理问题均得到了解决。研究发现,网上互动技巧有常用的,也有不常用的。在常用技巧的情况下,这表明了课程讲师的教学能力。相反,在不常用的情况下,则表明了现有的教学缺陷。研究得出的结论是,应在在线课程的设计和实施中采用促进互动和实现高阶学习成果的在线教学法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信