Exploring a Shared Benchmark for Measuring ESG Performance

Mario Risso, Francesco Longarini
{"title":"Exploring a Shared Benchmark for Measuring ESG Performance","authors":"Mario Risso, Francesco Longarini","doi":"10.4468/2023.01.07risso.longarini","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evolution of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) criteria is an ever-growing process. The relevant organizations and bodies have started to develop ad hoc initiatives and guidelines for the assessment and measurement of ESG criteria using different lines of assessment. As a result, investors have begun to use these indices as tools to direct their investments towards companies that stand out for the careful and enlightened use of environmental, social and governance variables. Subsequently, the ESG criteria were further refined and standardized, with the goal, not always achieved, of producing consistent and reliable measurements. The diversity of the nature of the companies, the sometimes difficult and inadequate reporting of certain information, combined with the lack of standardization of the results obtained, have made it impossible to produce an index that can be applied transversally to all or most of the companies. The objective of this work is therefore to propose a benchmark as useful as possible to standardize the results, in order to have a potential reference index for comparing the results of companies also operating in different sectors and with different characteristics.","PeriodicalId":509643,"journal":{"name":"Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4468/2023.01.07risso.longarini","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The evolution of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) criteria is an ever-growing process. The relevant organizations and bodies have started to develop ad hoc initiatives and guidelines for the assessment and measurement of ESG criteria using different lines of assessment. As a result, investors have begun to use these indices as tools to direct their investments towards companies that stand out for the careful and enlightened use of environmental, social and governance variables. Subsequently, the ESG criteria were further refined and standardized, with the goal, not always achieved, of producing consistent and reliable measurements. The diversity of the nature of the companies, the sometimes difficult and inadequate reporting of certain information, combined with the lack of standardization of the results obtained, have made it impossible to produce an index that can be applied transversally to all or most of the companies. The objective of this work is therefore to propose a benchmark as useful as possible to standardize the results, in order to have a potential reference index for comparing the results of companies also operating in different sectors and with different characteristics.
探索衡量环境、社会和公司治理绩效的共同基准
ESG(环境、社会和治理)标准的演变是一个不断发展的过程。相关组织和机构已开始利用不同的评估方法,为环境、社会和治理标准的评估和衡量制定特别倡议和指导方针。因此,投资者开始利用这些指数作为工具,将其投资导向那些在谨慎、明智地使用环境、社会和治理变量方面表现突出的公司。随后,环境、社会和治理标准得到了进一步完善和标准化,其目标是产生一致、可靠的衡量标准,但这一目标并非总能实现。由于公司性质的多样性,某些信息的报告有时比较困难和不充分,再加上所获得的结果缺乏标准化,因此不可能产生一个可以横向适用于所有或大多数公司的指数。因此,这项工作的目的是提出一个尽可能有用的基准,使结果标准化,以便有一个 潜在的参考指数,用于比较在不同部门和具有不同特点的公司的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信