Evaluation of Patient Discharge Information Between What Is Said and What Is Written

IF 0.6 Q4 Health Professions
Suha Tailakh, Muayyad Mustafa Ahmad
{"title":"Evaluation of Patient Discharge Information Between What Is Said and What Is Written","authors":"Suha Tailakh, Muayyad Mustafa Ahmad","doi":"10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients' discharge from the hospital is considered a crucial transition. Appropriate patient education about their condition and its treatment can reduce adverse events and improve health outcomes. Objective: Identifying high-risk patients for adverse events after hospital discharge and evaluating patient discharge information to ensure patients are safely discharged. Method: Between January 2019 and February 2020, a retrospective cross-sectional study examined hospital discharge notes. A random sample of 600 hospital discharges was audited, and a convenience sample of 150 patients was used to gauge patient satisfaction. Results: The patient's age, medical history, the presence of a physical limitation, and the presence of a surgical wound were all significantly related to readmission at p < .05. In addition, there was a significant correlation between emergency room visits, medical history, and physical or mental impairment p< .05. Lastly, the presence of complications was associated with physical restriction and surgical wound p < .05. The findings revealed that84.6% (n = 127) of patients did not appear to pay attention to the information on their discharge summaries, but they kept them as a reminder of their follow-up appointments. There were medical abbreviations in all of the discharge summaries (n = 150). Almost all discharge summaries contained at least 70% of the required information (diagnosis, past history, allergies, procedures, laboratory results, medications, and appointments). In contrast, the patients' level of satisfaction was lowest with respect to crucial aspects such as warning signs, recommendations, and educational materials. They were neither verbally nor in writing summarized. Conclusion: Patient-specific discharge information and summaries should be provided. It should be suitable for the patients' physical, educational, and psychological conditions. Important parts of post-discharge instructions should be provided in a straightforward, written format to improve health outcomes and reduce adverse events.","PeriodicalId":42935,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients' discharge from the hospital is considered a crucial transition. Appropriate patient education about their condition and its treatment can reduce adverse events and improve health outcomes. Objective: Identifying high-risk patients for adverse events after hospital discharge and evaluating patient discharge information to ensure patients are safely discharged. Method: Between January 2019 and February 2020, a retrospective cross-sectional study examined hospital discharge notes. A random sample of 600 hospital discharges was audited, and a convenience sample of 150 patients was used to gauge patient satisfaction. Results: The patient's age, medical history, the presence of a physical limitation, and the presence of a surgical wound were all significantly related to readmission at p < .05. In addition, there was a significant correlation between emergency room visits, medical history, and physical or mental impairment p< .05. Lastly, the presence of complications was associated with physical restriction and surgical wound p < .05. The findings revealed that84.6% (n = 127) of patients did not appear to pay attention to the information on their discharge summaries, but they kept them as a reminder of their follow-up appointments. There were medical abbreviations in all of the discharge summaries (n = 150). Almost all discharge summaries contained at least 70% of the required information (diagnosis, past history, allergies, procedures, laboratory results, medications, and appointments). In contrast, the patients' level of satisfaction was lowest with respect to crucial aspects such as warning signs, recommendations, and educational materials. They were neither verbally nor in writing summarized. Conclusion: Patient-specific discharge information and summaries should be provided. It should be suitable for the patients' physical, educational, and psychological conditions. Important parts of post-discharge instructions should be provided in a straightforward, written format to improve health outcomes and reduce adverse events.
评估病人出院信息的书面内容与口头内容之间的差异
背景:患者出院是一个关键的过渡时期。对患者进行适当的病情和治疗教育可减少不良事件,改善健康状况。目的:确定出院后发生不良事件的高危患者,并评估患者的教育内容:识别出院后发生不良事件的高危患者,评估患者出院信息,确保患者安全出院。方法:2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月期间,一项回顾性横断面研究对出院记录进行了检查。对 600 份出院记录进行了随机抽样审核,并对 150 名患者进行了方便抽样调查,以了解患者的满意度。研究结果患者的年龄、病史、身体是否受限以及是否有手术伤口均与再入院有显著相关性(P < .05)。此外,急诊就诊次数、病史和身体或精神损伤之间也有明显相关性,P<0.05。最后,并发症的出现与身体限制和手术伤口有关,P < .05。研究结果显示,84.6%(n = 127)的患者似乎并不关注出院摘要上的信息,但他们保留了出院摘要作为复诊预约的提醒。所有出院摘要中都有医学缩写(n = 150)。几乎所有出院摘要都包含至少 70% 的必要信息(诊断、既往史、过敏史、手术、化验结果、用药和预约)。相比之下,患者对警示信号、建议和教育材料等关键方面的满意度最低。他们既没有口头总结,也没有书面总结。结论应提供针对患者的出院信息和摘要。它们应适合患者的身体、教育和心理状况。出院后指导的重要部分应以简单明了的书面形式提供,以改善健康状况并减少不良事件的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
51
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信