How do we Determine Content Boundaries in Systematic Review Studies of Management Research?

Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.5530/jscires.12.3.059
Mehmet ali Koseoglu, H. Arici
{"title":"How do we Determine Content Boundaries in Systematic Review Studies of Management Research?","authors":"Mehmet ali Koseoglu, H. Arici","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.3.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To offer new insights into relevant concepts, approaches, and theories, a systematic literature review is considered a common phenomenon in today’s management field. But, the domain has still suffered from a lack of advice on how to design content boundaries as a methodological piece of a systematic review. Our study emphasizes this gap and examines the important piece of review studies in greater detail. Specifically, we provide a critical review of review studies published in leading three management journals (i.e., the International Journal of Management Reviews, the Academy of Management Annals, and the Journal of Management) between 2019 and 2022. Drawing on the methodological review, our research provides issues to acknowledge in the most crucial choices for the content boundary. In addition, our review clarifies three main components of the content boundary process: identification of content boundaries, searching for content boundaries, and confirmation of content boundaries. These components could be adopted as benchmark stages in future systematic review studies.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.3.059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To offer new insights into relevant concepts, approaches, and theories, a systematic literature review is considered a common phenomenon in today’s management field. But, the domain has still suffered from a lack of advice on how to design content boundaries as a methodological piece of a systematic review. Our study emphasizes this gap and examines the important piece of review studies in greater detail. Specifically, we provide a critical review of review studies published in leading three management journals (i.e., the International Journal of Management Reviews, the Academy of Management Annals, and the Journal of Management) between 2019 and 2022. Drawing on the methodological review, our research provides issues to acknowledge in the most crucial choices for the content boundary. In addition, our review clarifies three main components of the content boundary process: identification of content boundaries, searching for content boundaries, and confirmation of content boundaries. These components could be adopted as benchmark stages in future systematic review studies.
分享
查看原文
如何确定管理研究系统综述研究的内容界限?
为了对相关概念、方法和理论提出新的见解,系统性文献综述被认为是当今管理领域的一种普遍现象。但是,该领域仍然缺乏关于如何设计内容界限的建议,而内容界限是系统性综述的方法之一。我们的研究强调了这一差距,并对综述研究中的这一重要部分进行了更详细的研究。具体来说,我们对 2019 年至 2022 年间发表在三大管理期刊(即《国际管理评论杂志》、《管理学院年鉴》和《管理学报》)上的综述研究进行了批判性评述。借鉴方法论评论,我们的研究提供了在内容边界的最关键选择中需要承认的问题。此外,我们的综述阐明了内容边界过程的三个主要组成部分:确定内容边界、搜索内容边界和确认内容边界。在未来的系统性综述研究中,可将这些组成部分作为基准阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信